Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | V V V V V V | V V V V V | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 2 | GAJJALA Sharika R. | V V V D D | V V V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
| 3 | NGUYEN Kira | D D V D D V | V V V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 3 | YIN Julia | D D D V V V | V V V V D | 4.7 | 3 | -1.7 |
| 5 | MAO Amy | V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 6 | LIN Katie Y. | V V D V V V | V V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 7 | QI Jarynne Valerie | V V V V V D | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 8 | ZHU Serene M. | D D D D V | V V V D | 2.5 | 1 | -1.5 |
| 9 | WADE-CURRIE Ava S. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
| 10 | LUO Ashley | V V V V V V | V D | 4.4 | 6 | +1.6 |
| 11 | HAFEEZ Hiba | V D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 12 | MING Cynthia | D V V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 13 | SMOTRITSKY Mia | V V D V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 14 | LI yu | D V V V D V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 15 | DONG Ava | D V V D V D | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 16 | ZHENG Linden | D D D D D | V V D | 2.4 | 0 | -2.4 |
| 17 | XUAN Nicole J. | V V V V V | D | 3.9 | 5 | +1.1 |
| 18 | ZIGALO Elizabeth | V V V V D V | D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
| 19 | LIU Nicole | V D V V V | D | 1.1 | 4 | +2.9 |
| 20 | ZENG Katrina | V V D V D V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 21 | YU Nicole J. | D V V V V D | D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 22 | LI Suri | V V D D V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 23 | FAN Elizabeth | V V V D D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 24 | LI Zhenni (Jenny) | V V D V D | V D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
| 25 | AI Amy | D D V V V D | V D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
| 26 | FURMAN Maria | D V D V V D | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 27 | CHEN Jingyun | D V V D D | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 28 | HAFEEZ Hania | V D D V D | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 29 | CHISHOLM Phoebe C. | V V D D D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 30 | MUELLER Emma M. | D D D D V V | V D | 3.9 | 2 | -1.9 |
| 31 | MARTINO Alessandra | D V V D D D | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 32 | JIANG Caroline T. | D D V D D D | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 33 | WITTER Catherine A. | D D V D V V | D | 3.9 | 3 | -0.9 |
| 34 | HU Chelsea | V V D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 35 | DENG Annie | D V D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 36 | BEEM Marin | D D V D V | D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
| 37 | LIN Elaine | D D D V V | D | 1.1 | 2 | +0.9 |
| 38 | BARCLAY Khyri | V D D D D V | D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 39 | WANG Esther | D D D V D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 40 | MAMEDOVA Farah | V V D D D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 41 | PAOLINO Grace | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 42 | YOU Isabel B. | D D D V D D | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 43 | HOOPER Lucy | D D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 44 | TYTELL Elizabeth | D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
| 45 | FAN Catherine | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 46 | ANOUSIS Angelica | D D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.