Chelsea Piers Connecticut and Tim Morehouse Fencing Club - CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | CHEN Ethan | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 2 | GHEDINI Luca | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
| 3 | SHENG Dalton | - | - | - | - | 4% | 25% | 71% |
| 3 | CHEN Hanson | - | 1% | 5% | 21% | 37% | 29% | 8% |
| 5 | LIU ERIC | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% |
| 6 | TANG Terry | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 47% |
| 7 | TOOMRE Kai | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 8% |
| 8 | BAKSHI Aman | 18% | 41% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 9 | GRIGORIEV Michael | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 35% | 7% |
| 10 | WONG Jacob W. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 12% |
| 11 | HOU Gaven | - | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 38% | 21% |
| 12 | ONIK Ari N. | - | - | 4% | 20% | 42% | 29% | 5% |
| 13 | HELMY Richard | 1% | 6% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 10% | 1% |
| 14 | XIE Jicheng | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 4% |
| 15 | QIAN Zekai | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 16 | YAVENDITTI William | - | 3% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 19% | 4% |
| 17 | HUANG Jinyao | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 4% |
| 18 | O'LEARY Colin | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | - |
| 19 | NABASSOUA Djibril | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 20 | SHAW eric | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 21 | LU Hansen | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | CHEN kenneth | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 23 | KINGSLEY Griffin | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
| 24 | CZARNECKI Thomas | 1% | 9% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 25 | WANG Ancen | 1% | 8% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 26 | WANG Luke | 5% | 25% | 41% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 27 | KRZYWON Dylan | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 28 | YU Haochen | 2% | 15% | 33% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 29 | MA Lucas | 13% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 30 | UNGERER Henry | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 31 | WANG ZEYU | 2% | 13% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 32 | ULYSSE Jacob | 19% | 44% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 33 | LIN Qianzhong | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 25% | 7% | - |
| 34 | BAI Austin | 8% | 27% | 34% | 22% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 35 | ROTH Adam | - | 1% | 15% | 56% | 24% | 3% | - |
| 36 | EL SHARKAWY Omar | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 37 | ZHANG Zijie | 13% | 33% | 33% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 38 | JIANG Kody | 31% | 43% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 39 | HU Michael | 7% | 25% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 40 | HU Eden | 1% | 16% | 44% | 33% | 5% | - | - |
| 41 | HU Daniel | 25% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 42 | BO Aiden | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.