Boston, MA - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SO Hananiah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 56% |
2 | LINSKY Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 46% |
3 | KEEFE Duncan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 68% | 22% |
3 | CHAN Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 34% |
5 | SKINNER Graham B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 82% | 36% | |
6 | GINIS Nathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
7 | FENG Leo | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 70% | 35% | 8% |
8 | KILGALLEN William | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
9 | MAKLIN Edward P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 16% |
10 | BERMAN Luca | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
11 | KOGAN Benjamin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
12 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 18% |
13 | KIM-COGAN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | |
14 | WILSON Jude | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 45% |
15 | DENG Andrew | 100% | 98% | 89% | 63% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
16 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 28% |
17 | NOBLE Colin | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 20% | 3% |
18 | WU Richard | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 18% | 3% | - |
19 | HUANG Ethan F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 22% | |
20 | LEE Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 24% | 3% |
21 | BABAYEV Gabriel A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 30% |
22 | LI Minghan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 17% | 2% |
23 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 15% | 1% |
24 | DOLAN Charles R. | 100% | 65% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
25 | CHANG Yufeng | 100% | 99% | 90% | 54% | 17% | 2% | - |
26 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 22% | 5% | - |
27 | TURCK Caspar J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 35% | 7% |
28 | HONG Vincent Q. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 3% |
29 | ZENG Noah | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 27% | 6% | - |
30 | ZHENG Edward L. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
31 | LIU Mingyang Ryan | 100% | 77% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
32 | MCCARTHY Gabriel | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 19% | 3% | |
33 | BUCHMANN Finn D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 9% |
34 | SHTEYN Mark | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 4% |
35 | BAE Jason I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 27% |
36 | VARUKATTY-GAFOOR Sohil | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
37 | STURN Oliver | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 11% | |
38 | OH Triton | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 26% | 3% | |
39 | PIWOWAR Alex | 100% | 75% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
40 | VAUGHN Jason | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - |
41 | DOWNEY Baran | 100% | 100% | 96% | 72% | 30% | 5% | - |
42 | PENG Bryan | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 19% | 4% | - |
43 | MYLEK Peter | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 1% |
44 | WANG Robert | 100% | 99% | 87% | 58% | 24% | 5% | - |
45 | MORALES Jonathan | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
46 | ZHUANG Rayken | 100% | 54% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
47 | SAVOY Luca | 100% | 98% | 82% | 39% | 8% | 1% | |
48 | GILSON Lucas B. | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
49 | GOLDMAN Noah R. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 38% | 10% | 1% | |
50 | CHTERENTAL Alex | 100% | 95% | 70% | 31% | 7% | 1% | |
51 | HUANG Connor | 100% | 99% | 89% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
52 | HONG Steven | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 22% | 3% |
53 | ZHANG Ethan W. | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 17% | 3% | - |
54 | ZHANG Derek | 100% | 99% | 84% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - |
55 | HUANG Maxwell H. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 56% | 20% | 3% |
56 | HUROWITZ Max | 100% | 87% | 51% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
57 | OWENS Harrison J. | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
58 | ZHANG Yankun | 100% | 54% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
59 | OVERDECK Andrew | 100% | 90% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - | |
60 | PENTLAND Craig | 100% | 43% | 7% | - | - | - | |
61 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 91% | 61% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
62 | WEN Edward | 100% | 77% | 37% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
63 | WAXLER Seth B. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% | |
64 | KESSLER Josh | 100% | 85% | 35% | 6% | - | - | |
65 | CHANG Yuyang | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
66 | BROOK Joel | 100% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
67 | PERRON Robert | 100% | 81% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
68 | SHIPITSIN Yaroslav | 100% | 27% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
69 | SHINCHUK Daniel | 100% | 97% | 76% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - |
69 | LIN Stephen | 100% | 84% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - | - |
71 | CAO Bryan | 100% | 77% | 20% | 2% | - | - | - |
72 | SIMMONS John M. | 100% | 90% | 61% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - |
72 | WONG Alexander | 100% | 91% | 37% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
74 | KESSLER Nathan | 100% | 89% | 54% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.