Chelsea Piers Connecticut and Tim Morehouse Fencing Club - CT - Stamford, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | KIM Shaun M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
| 2 | FENG Leo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 55% |
| 3 | MORALES Jonathan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 30% |
| 3 | OH Triton | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 52% |
| 5 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 51% |
| 6 | SUGIURA Samuel | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
| 7 | LAU Justin Y. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 52% | 15% |
| 8 | FIELDS Matthew S. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 7% |
| 9 | BRANDT Jaden | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% |
| 10 | ATWOOD Griffin | 100% | 91% | 62% | 26% | 6% | - |
| 11 | KATZ Ryan | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 12 | HUANG Alexander C. | 100% | 100% | 90% | 53% | 13% | |
| 13 | HUANG Alex F. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 33% | |
| 14 | WAXLER Seth B. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 10% |
| 15 | SHAH Sajan | 100% | 97% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
| 16 | TASIKAS Stylianos | 100% | 99% | 88% | 55% | 17% | 2% |
| 17 | DEPEW Spencer | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 59% | 19% |
| 18 | BERA Enzo | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 68% | 23% |
| 19 | GONG Jerry | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% |
| 20 | KIM Ethan | 100% | 99% | 82% | 40% | 8% | |
| 21 | YOO Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 43% | 8% |
| 22 | FRANCOIS Alexander C. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 18% | 2% |
| 23 | LAUB William | 100% | 85% | 45% | 12% | 1% | - |
| 24 | CHUNG Connor | 100% | 99% | 87% | 53% | 16% | 1% |
| 25 | TSAO Oliver | 100% | 97% | 77% | 40% | 11% | 1% |
| 26 | NGUYEN Anthony | 100% | 97% | 78% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | CHENG Hong | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
| 28 | KILGALLEN William | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 23% |
| 29 | SMINK Oliver | 100% | 99% | 88% | 54% | 16% | 1% |
| 30 | CHOKSI Vihaan | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 31 | MATTOO Surya | 100% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - | - |
| 32 | OLOUGHLIN Quin | 100% | 68% | 20% | 2% | - | - |
| 33 | LEONARD Charles | 100% | 97% | 80% | 46% | 14% | 1% |
| 34 | MUNGOVAN Matthew | 100% | 99% | 86% | 51% | 15% | 1% |
| 35 | MANESCU Miron | 100% | 91% | 58% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 36 | ANAND Sahil Z. | 100% | 96% | 73% | 33% | 6% | - |
| 37 | KAUFFMAN James | 100% | 92% | 65% | 30% | 8% | 1% |
| 38 | FREDRICK Jameer | 100% | 99% | 91% | 58% | 18% | 2% |
| 39 | WAXLER Ryan | 100% | 93% | 67% | 31% | 7% | - |
| 40 | WANG Daniel | 100% | 99% | 69% | 25% | 3% | |
| 41 | HO Jacob | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 42 | MATTOO Deven | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - |
| 42 | LEE Andrew | 100% | 91% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - |
| 44 | XU Justin | 100% | 66% | 22% | 4% | - | - |
| 44 | COUNTS Nicholas | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 46 | WONG Caleb W. | 100% | 67% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 47 | SIMMONS John M. | 100% | 89% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 48 | MARGULIS Jared | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 49 | KULKARNI Rohan | 100% | 66% | 18% | 2% | - | - |
| 50 | KIARA Kinoti | 100% | 97% | 79% | 41% | 10% | 1% |
| 51 | MATTINGLY Ian | 100% | 12% | - | - | - | |
| 52 | TSAO Alister | 100% | 82% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 53 | KOGAN Joseph | 100% | 92% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.