Windy City SYC#8 /RCC

Y-14 Men's Foil

Saturday, September 24, 2022 at 12:00 PM

Berto Center / Also known as Felicity School - Deerfield, IL, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 GUERRA Gabriel H. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 54%
2 TRAUGOT Owen G. 100% 100% 100% 100% 99% 89% 53%
3 SUAREZ Adrian 100% 100% 98% 87% 59% 25% 5%
3 STRINGER David 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 38% 8%
5 TANG August L. 100% 100% 100% 96% 76% 33%
6 KIAYIAS Aris 100% 100% 100% 98% 84% 51% 15%
7 MAO Lucas 100% 100% 98% 86% 53% 15%
8 XU Andy P. 100% 100% 100% 97% 85% 55% 17%
9 TANG Albert 100% 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 38%
10 LEE Brendan 100% 100% 98% 86% 52% 13%
11 LIU Ethan 100% 100% 100% 99% 95% 77% 37%
12 GUTH Joseph 100% 100% 100% 96% 80% 45% 11%
13 CHEN Kyle P. 100% 100% 100% 96% 79% 40% 7%
14 EDWARDS Maxon 100% 100% 98% 83% 45% 10%
15 TAN Aidan 100% 99% 93% 70% 34% 7%
16 ZHANG Aaron 100% 100% 100% 99% 93% 68% 26%
17 XU Xinhao ( Sonny) 100% 100% 97% 84% 54% 20% 2%
18 BARCA Bryant 100% 97% 80% 46% 16% 3% -
19 LI Bradley 100% 100% 100% 97% 83% 49% 14%
20 SENIC Lucas 100% 100% 99% 92% 64% 22%
21 HAN Derek 100% 100% 99% 89% 62% 26% 4%
22 TANG Alexander L. 100% 100% 100% 99% 90% 60% 19%
23 XIE Buster 100% 99% 92% 66% 29% 7% 1%
24 TWEMLOW Sacha 100% 99% 93% 70% 36% 10% 1%
25 ZHAO Nathan 100% 100% 100% 96% 75% 36% 7%
26 DENG David 100% 96% 74% 36% 9% 1% -
27 GOODLIN Sean 100% 85% 45% 12% 2% - -
28 VANOYEN Dominick 100% 100% 96% 79% 47% 16% 2%
29 ROZALSKI Eli 100% 99% 89% 63% 28% 6% -
30 LU Kevin 100% 99% 88% 61% 27% 7% 1%
31 GRIFFITH MCALLISTER Thomas 100% 92% 62% 26% 6% 1%
32 BAE Eugene 100% 85% 47% 13% 2% - -
33 ZHANG Lucas 100% 100% 98% 86% 56% 21% 3%
34 ALLEN Henry G. 100% 100% 95% 76% 40% 9%
35 CHUANG Oscar 100% 99% 85% 48% 14% 2%
36 DESERANNO Leander 100% 100% 99% 93% 69% 29% 4%
37 SUN Ryan 100% 100% 98% 87% 58% 22% 3%
38 MANDZY Theodor 100% 100% 98% 89% 62% 26% 5%
38 PARRISH Evan 100% 99% 93% 70% 35% 9% 1%
40 LIU Yinhong 100% 99% 89% 57% 20% 3% -
41 LI Joseph 100% 99% 85% 52% 19% 3% -
42 HUANG Eythan 100% 100% 99% 90% 61% 19%
43 PALMA Nathan Anthony 100% 100% 97% 80% 40% 8%
44 CHENG Logan 100% 100% 94% 70% 29% 5%
45 LO Preston 100% 100% 97% 83% 51% 15%
46 WONG Evan 100% 99% 93% 71% 37% 11% 1%
47 LORENZO Alejandro 100% 100% 99% 93% 70% 33% 7%
48 CHANG Eric Jonathan 100% 100% 97% 85% 54% 19% 2%
49 XU Nathan 100% 84% 46% 14% 2% -
50 CHANG Jeremy 100% 98% 84% 45% 12% 1%
51 FINDLAY Zachary 100% 96% 77% 41% 11% 1%
52 ZENG Rick 100% 100% 95% 73% 36% 9% 1%
53 MASSIMINO Andrew 100% 96% 75% 39% 12% 2% -
54 DOELL Ethan 100% 98% 83% 51% 20% 4% -
54 HEYBOER Jason 100% 84% 40% 10% 1% - -
56 HICKEY Connor 100% 95% 73% 37% 11% 1% -
57 WINGLER Cole 100% 86% 47% 13% 2% - -
58 LOZANO Veyron Jericho 100% 87% 52% 18% 3% - -
58 ZUCKER Avi 100% 100% 99% 90% 64% 26% 4%
60 KIM Daniel 100% 94% 71% 34% 9% 1%
61 KUE Temujin 100% 93% 55% 17% 2% -
62 MARISI Gabriel 100% 81% 42% 12% 2% -
63 THIYAGARAJAA Ari 100% 74% 27% 5% - -
64 SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn 100% 100% 98% 86% 58% 24% 4%
65 KNIBBE Nathan 100% 88% 54% 19% 3% -
66 HOLLIDAY Christopher Mansfield-Scott 100% 98% 85% 55% 21% 3%
67 GOGOI Kavi 100% 85% 49% 16% 3% - -
68 OZAWA Taishi 100% 98% 81% 45% 15% 2% -
69 KAGAN Noah 100% 99% 89% 59% 22% 4% -
70 HOWLAND Jonas 100% 64% 23% 5% - - -
71 WANG Xiuqi(Arthur) 100% 71% 28% 5% - - -
72 HWANG Harris 100% 75% 34% 9% 1% - -
73 ZMUDA Aiden 100% 80% 38% 8% 1% - -
74 HERRERA Xavier 100% 52% 11% 1% - - -
75 ZHANG Hanson 100% 65% 19% 3% - -
76 CHOI Benjamin 100% 99% 91% 65% 30% 7% 1%
76 ZHAO Ryan 100% 64% 23% 5% 1% - -
78 IBRAHIM Khaden 100% 35% 5% - - -
79 TACK Everett 100% 29% 4% - - - -
80 DIFRANK Tae 100% 79% 37% 10% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.