Chaminade College Preparatory High School - Los Angeles, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% |
2 | LI Avery Peihong | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 38% | |
3 | SADOVSKY Leor B. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 63% | 16% | |
3 | BARTON Trent | 100% | 99% | 89% | 59% | 21% | 3% | |
5 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 42% | 10% | |
6 | NA Rongtian | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 13% | - |
7 | LAKE Wyatt J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 63% | |
8 | ORNELAS Matteo | 100% | 98% | 84% | 52% | 17% | 2% | |
9 | POUND Michael | 100% | 95% | 70% | 32% | 7% | < 1% | |
10 | GRAPHIA Gabriel | 100% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
11 | MORTON Joshua | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 7% | 1% | |
12 | LEVY Ofek O. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 57% | 16% | |
13 | KIM Luke | 100% | 69% | 24% | 3% | - | - | |
14 | RAMOS Russell K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% | |
15 | SMITH Jeremiah | 100% | 82% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | |
16 | RAINS Jackson T. | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 16% | 1% | |
17 | SEMIDEY Tomaso | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | |
18 | MONTGOMERY Georgie | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - | |
19 | ROSE Jacob W. | 100% | 91% | 59% | 21% | 4% | - | - |
20 | KEITH Hudson | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 21% | 3% | - |
21 | COLLIGAN Apollo | 100% | 93% | 67% | 32% | 9% | 1% | - |
22 | FURBERG Maxwell | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 6% | |
23 | BUTLER Owen | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | |
24 | JUAREZ Semaje | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 34% | 4% | |
25 | DESPRES Kaz | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
26 | ADAMS Logan | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 9% | |
27 | LEE Benjamin | 100% | 68% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
28 | GALAVIZ MacArthur | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 39% | 8% | |
29 | SULLIVAN SALVADOR Antonio | 100% | 93% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - | |
30 | CHIN Yit-Meng | 100% | 91% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - | |
31 | NORDEN Max | 100% | 75% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | |
32 | VITET Jules | 100% | 93% | 62% | 20% | 1% | - | |
33 | GORDON Pierce | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% | |
34 | THORNTON Maximilian | 100% | 88% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | |
35 | REECE Chapin | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% | - |
36 | BENYAMIN Alexander | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 22% | 4% | |
37 | GRACZYK James | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.