October NAC

Y-14 Men's Saber

Friday, October 7, 2022 at 1:00 PM

Minneapolis, MN, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 TAO Jeffrey - - - 4% 18% 41% 37%
2 JOO Jeein - - 4% 17% 35% 32% 11%
3 KWALWASSER Eric - - - 2% 12% 38% 48%
3 GONZALEZ Emilio A. - - 1% 6% 32% 61%
5 ZHU Yuchen (Kevin) - - 3% 14% 31% 36% 17%
6 GUFFEY Christopher 1% 7% 25% 37% 25% 6%
7 NG Jonathan 2% 12% 28% 32% 19% 6% 1%
8 MEHAN Nicholas - - 2% 12% 32% 39% 14%
9 HOLZ Daniel - - - 3% 17% 43% 37%
10 GONG Jerry - 1% 7% 28% 45% 19%
11 KUSHKOV Daniel - 1% 9% 32% 44% 14%
12 LI Yiwei - 4% 19% 39% 31% 5%
13 RAMANAN Jaisimh - 5% 19% 36% 30% 10%
14 KALPATHY Rohit - 2% 11% 32% 39% 16%
15 SU Landon - - 2% 9% 26% 39% 25%
16 KANG Evan 1% 9% 24% 33% 24% 9% 1%
17 PRIMUS Nazir - - - 3% 15% 40% 41%
18 YANG Dylan - - 1% 9% 27% 41% 22%
19 PASTORE LIU Vince - 3% 16% 34% 33% 12%
20 WANG Zhuoyi 2% 15% 37% 33% 12% 2%
21 PATEL Rayn - 1% 10% 31% 40% 17%
22 CHON Collin 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
23 WANG daniel - 2% 9% 25% 36% 24% 5%
24 HWANG Jayden - 5% 17% 32% 31% 13% 2%
25 NGUYEN Anthony - 4% 15% 30% 31% 16% 3%
26 HU Christopher - - 1% 7% 24% 41% 27%
27 HUANG Alex F. - - 1% 11% 41% 47%
28 ANTHONY Devyn V. - - 2% 13% 43% 42%
29 ANAND Rohan - 2% 10% 26% 35% 22% 5%
30 ERMAKOV Semeon 1% 11% 30% 35% 19% 4% -
31 ZHAO Lucas 1% 6% 22% 36% 28% 8%
32 ZHENG LEON 2% 13% 30% 33% 18% 4% -
33 RAMANAN Govind 1% 6% 19% 33% 29% 11% 1%
34 VAID Luke - 2% 11% 30% 38% 18%
35 CHEN Samuel 3% 17% 37% 32% 10% 1%
36 BERA Enzo - 4% 16% 34% 32% 12% 2%
37 LI Maxwell 4% 17% 32% 30% 14% 3% -
38 HOLZ Lucas 2% 13% 29% 32% 18% 5% 1%
39 LIN Philip T. 5% 26% 42% 22% 4% -
40 PRIEUR Christian F. 31% 42% 22% 5% 1% -
40 SHIPITSIN Alexander 2% 12% 32% 37% 16% 2%
42 MUNGUIA Nathan 1% 6% 26% 42% 22% 3%
43 TUNG Ryan 7% 26% 35% 23% 7% 1% -
43 EYBELMAN Ariel - 5% 17% 31% 30% 14% 3%
45 KIM ELIJAH - 5% 19% 35% 29% 11% 1%
46 SUGIURA Samuel - 2% 10% 26% 36% 23% 5%
47 LEE Andrew 2% 14% 31% 32% 16% 4% -
48 ATWOOD Griffin 1% 8% 24% 34% 24% 8% 1%
49 SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. - 3% 14% 30% 32% 17% 3%
50 TSAO Oliver 10% 34% 37% 16% 3% -
51 MEYERSON Jacob 3% 19% 35% 30% 11% 2%
52 ALAVE Kyle 1% 11% 29% 35% 20% 4%
53 KATZ Ryan 1% 8% 24% 33% 24% 8% 1%
54 CRAIG Andrew 20% 40% 29% 9% 1% - -
55 OLALIA-NAPIER Gabriel 12% 32% 33% 17% 5% 1% -
56 LIGH Checed 20% 37% 29% 11% 2% - -
57 OH Aster 1% 8% 23% 34% 25% 9% 1%
58 CHEN Lohen 2% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5% -
59 MATTOO Deven 54% 36% 9% 1% - - -
59 SO Preston 2% 13% 32% 33% 16% 4% -
61 LAUB William 8% 35% 38% 16% 3% -
62 NGO Maximus 4% 24% 38% 25% 8% 1% -
63 WONG Caleb W. 17% 36% 31% 13% 3% - -
64 HUNG Samuel 4% 22% 40% 28% 7% -
65 LIN Maxim - 3% 16% 33% 32% 14% 2%
66 ZHOU William 36% 40% 19% 5% 1% - -
67 GUREVICH Benjamin 5% 20% 34% 28% 12% 2% -
68 ANAND Rishab 3% 17% 32% 30% 14% 3% -
69 WANG Max 6% 26% 37% 23% 7% 1%
70 LIU Kevin - 4% 21% 39% 29% 7%
71 LIU Aaron 21% 42% 28% 7% 1% -
72 CHUNG Connor 7% 29% 38% 21% 4% -
73 FANG Eason 2% 11% 27% 34% 21% 6% -
74 GAY Jono 4% 18% 33% 29% 13% 3% -
75 NARDINI Nathanael P. 3% 17% 34% 31% 13% 2% -
76 KIM Kendrick 5% 21% 35% 27% 10% 2% -
77 BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. 1% 7% 22% 33% 26% 10% 1%
78 YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) 1% 8% 24% 34% 24% 9% 1%
79 ZHAO Zhiyu 20% 38% 28% 11% 2% - -
80 YANG Si He 26% 44% 24% 5% - -
81 BREGADZE NODAR 19% 41% 30% 9% 1% -
82 ANDRES Michael 1% 8% 26% 36% 23% 5%
83 VUONG Kyle Ka-Him 9% 31% 36% 19% 5% -
84 SHANKWILER Christopher - 4% 16% 30% 31% 16% 3%
85 YANG Phillip 4% 18% 33% 29% 13% 3% -
86 AUTREY Adrien 56% 35% 8% 1% - -
87 PEREIRA Beckham 14% 37% 33% 13% 2% - -
88 GONG Gavin 24% 46% 25% 5% - -
89 ORLIN Edward 23% 42% 27% 7% 1% -
90 SUN Andrew 29% 42% 23% 6% 1% -
91 DAI Zihou 3% 16% 31% 30% 16% 4% -
92 GREMILLION Obadiah 24% 40% 26% 8% 1% - -

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.