Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TAO Jeffrey | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 37% |
| 2 | JOO Jeein | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 3 | KWALWASSER Eric | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 38% | 48% |
| 3 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | - | - | 1% | 6% | 32% | 61% | |
| 5 | ZHU Yuchen (Kevin) | - | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
| 6 | GUFFEY Christopher | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 7 | NG Jonathan | 2% | 12% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 8 | MEHAN Nicholas | - | - | 2% | 12% | 32% | 39% | 14% |
| 9 | HOLZ Daniel | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 37% |
| 10 | GONG Jerry | - | 1% | 7% | 28% | 45% | 19% | |
| 11 | KUSHKOV Daniel | - | 1% | 9% | 32% | 44% | 14% | |
| 12 | LI Yiwei | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 5% | |
| 13 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | - | 5% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | |
| 14 | KALPATHY Rohit | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 39% | 16% | |
| 15 | SU Landon | - | - | 2% | 9% | 26% | 39% | 25% |
| 16 | KANG Evan | 1% | 9% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 17 | PRIMUS Nazir | - | - | - | 3% | 15% | 40% | 41% |
| 18 | YANG Dylan | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 41% | 22% |
| 19 | PASTORE LIU Vince | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 33% | 12% | |
| 20 | WANG Zhuoyi | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
| 21 | PATEL Rayn | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 17% | |
| 22 | CHON Collin | 1% | 6% | 21% | 34% | 27% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | WANG daniel | - | 2% | 9% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 5% |
| 24 | HWANG Jayden | - | 5% | 17% | 32% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
| 25 | NGUYEN Anthony | - | 4% | 15% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 26 | HU Christopher | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 27% |
| 27 | HUANG Alex F. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% | |
| 28 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | - | - | 2% | 13% | 43% | 42% | |
| 29 | ANAND Rohan | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 30 | ERMAKOV Semeon | 1% | 11% | 30% | 35% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 31 | ZHAO Lucas | 1% | 6% | 22% | 36% | 28% | 8% | |
| 32 | ZHENG LEON | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | - |
| 33 | RAMANAN Govind | 1% | 6% | 19% | 33% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 34 | VAID Luke | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 38% | 18% | |
| 35 | CHEN Samuel | 3% | 17% | 37% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 36 | BERA Enzo | - | 4% | 16% | 34% | 32% | 12% | 2% |
| 37 | LI Maxwell | 4% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 38 | HOLZ Lucas | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 5% | 1% |
| 39 | LIN Philip T. | 5% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 4% | - | |
| 40 | PRIEUR Christian F. | 31% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | |
| 40 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | 2% | 12% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 2% | |
| 42 | MUNGUIA Nathan | 1% | 6% | 26% | 42% | 22% | 3% | |
| 43 | TUNG Ryan | 7% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 43 | EYBELMAN Ariel | - | 5% | 17% | 31% | 30% | 14% | 3% |
| 45 | KIM ELIJAH | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 1% |
| 46 | SUGIURA Samuel | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% |
| 47 | LEE Andrew | 2% | 14% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 48 | ATWOOD Griffin | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 49 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 3% |
| 50 | TSAO Oliver | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 51 | MEYERSON Jacob | 3% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 2% | |
| 52 | ALAVE Kyle | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 4% | |
| 53 | KATZ Ryan | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 54 | CRAIG Andrew | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | OLALIA-NAPIER Gabriel | 12% | 32% | 33% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 56 | LIGH Checed | 20% | 37% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 57 | OH Aster | 1% | 8% | 23% | 34% | 25% | 9% | 1% |
| 58 | CHEN Lohen | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 59 | MATTOO Deven | 54% | 36% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 59 | SO Preston | 2% | 13% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 61 | LAUB William | 8% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 62 | NGO Maximus | 4% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 63 | WONG Caleb W. | 17% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | HUNG Samuel | 4% | 22% | 40% | 28% | 7% | - | |
| 65 | LIN Maxim | - | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 66 | ZHOU William | 36% | 40% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 67 | GUREVICH Benjamin | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 68 | ANAND Rishab | 3% | 17% | 32% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 69 | WANG Max | 6% | 26% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | |
| 70 | LIU Kevin | - | 4% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 71 | LIU Aaron | 21% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 72 | CHUNG Connor | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 73 | FANG Eason | 2% | 11% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | - |
| 74 | GAY Jono | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 75 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 76 | KIM Kendrick | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 77 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | 1% | 7% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 1% |
| 78 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
| 79 | ZHAO Zhiyu | 20% | 38% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 80 | YANG Si He | 26% | 44% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 81 | BREGADZE NODAR | 19% | 41% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 82 | ANDRES Michael | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 5% | |
| 83 | VUONG Kyle Ka-Him | 9% | 31% | 36% | 19% | 5% | - | |
| 84 | SHANKWILER Christopher | - | 4% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 85 | YANG Phillip | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 86 | AUTREY Adrien | 56% | 35% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 87 | PEREIRA Beckham | 14% | 37% | 33% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 88 | GONG Gavin | 24% | 46% | 25% | 5% | - | - | |
| 89 | ORLIN Edward | 23% | 42% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 90 | SUN Andrew | 29% | 42% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 91 | DAI Zihou | 3% | 16% | 31% | 30% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 92 | GREMILLION Obadiah | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.