Minneapolis, MN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
# | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
1 | TAO Jeffrey | V V V V V V | V V V V V V | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
2 | JOO Jeein | V V V D V V | V V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
3 | KWALWASSER Eric | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
3 | GONZALEZ Emilio A. | V V V V D | V V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
5 | ZHU Yuchen (Kevin) | V V V V V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 6 | +1.5 |
6 | GUFFEY Christopher | V V V V V | V V V D | 3.0 | 5 | +2.0 |
7 | NG Jonathan | D V V V V V | V V V D | 2.8 | 5 | +2.2 |
8 | MEHAN Nicholas | V V D D V V | V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
9 | HOLZ Daniel | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.1 | 6 | +0.9 |
10 | GONG Jerry | V V V V V | V V D | 3.7 | 5 | +1.3 |
11 | KUSHKOV Daniel | V V V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
12 | LI Yiwei | V V V D V | V V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
13 | RAMANAN Jaisimh | V V D V V | V V D | 3.2 | 4 | +0.8 |
14 | KALPATHY Rohit | V D V V V | V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
15 | SU Landon | D V V V D V | V V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
16 | KANG Evan | V D D V V V | V V D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
17 | PRIMUS Nazir | V V V V V V | V D | 5.2 | 6 | +0.8 |
18 | YANG Dylan | V V V V V D | V D | 4.7 | 5 | +0.3 |
19 | PASTORE LIU Vince | V V V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
20 | WANG Zhuoyi | D V V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
21 | PATEL Rayn | V V V V D | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
22 | CHON Collin | V V D V V D | V D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
23 | WANG daniel | D V V V V D | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
24 | HWANG Jayden | V D V V V D | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
25 | NGUYEN Anthony | V D V V D V | V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
26 | HU Christopher | V D V V V D | V D | 4.8 | 4 | -0.8 |
27 | HUANG Alex F. | D V D V V | V D | 4.3 | 3 | -1.3 |
28 | ANTHONY Devyn V. | V D V D V | V V D | 4.2 | 3 | -1.2 |
29 | ANAND Rohan | D D D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
30 | ERMAKOV Semeon | V D D D V V | V V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
31 | ZHAO Lucas | D V D D V | V V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
32 | ZHENG LEON | D D V D D D | V V D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
33 | RAMANAN Govind | V V D V V V | D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
34 | VAID Luke | V V V V D | D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
35 | CHEN Samuel | V V V V D | D | 2.3 | 4 | +1.7 |
36 | BERA Enzo | V V V V D D | D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
37 | LI Maxwell | D V V V D V | D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
38 | HOLZ Lucas | V D V V V D | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
39 | LIN Philip T. | V D D V V | D | 1.9 | 3 | +1.1 |
40 | PRIEUR Christian F. | V D V V D | D | 1.0 | 3 | +2.0 |
40 | SHIPITSIN Alexander | D D V V V | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
42 | MUNGUIA Nathan | V V V D D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
43 | TUNG Ryan | D V D D V V | V D | 2.0 | 3 | +1.0 |
43 | EYBELMAN Ariel | D D V V D V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
45 | KIM ELIJAH | V D D D V V | V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
46 | SUGIURA Samuel | D D V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 3 | -0.8 |
47 | LEE Andrew | D V D V D V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
48 | ATWOOD Griffin | D D V V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
49 | SKARBONKIEWICZ Maksymilian A. | V V V D D D | V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
50 | TSAO Oliver | V D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
51 | MEYERSON Jacob | D D V D V | V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
52 | ALAVE Kyle | D D D V V | V D | 2.7 | 2 | -0.7 |
53 | KATZ Ryan | D V D V D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
54 | CRAIG Andrew | D D D V V D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
55 | OLALIA-NAPIER Gabriel | V D D D V D | V D | 1.7 | 2 | +0.3 |
56 | LIGH Checed | V V D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
57 | OH Aster | V V D D D D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
58 | CHEN Lohen | D D D D V V | V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
59 | MATTOO Deven | D D D V D V | V D | 0.6 | 2 | +1.4 |
59 | SO Preston | D V D V D D | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
61 | LAUB William | D D D D V | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
62 | NGO Maximus | D D D D V D | V D | 2.1 | 1 | -1.1 |
63 | WONG Caleb W. | D D D D V D | V D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
64 | HUNG Samuel | D D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 0 | -2.1 |
65 | LIN Maxim | V D V V D D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
66 | ZHOU William | V V D D V D | D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
67 | GUREVICH Benjamin | V D D V D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
68 | ANAND Rishab | V D V D D V | D | 2.5 | 3 | +0.5 |
69 | WANG Max | V D D V D | D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
70 | LIU Kevin | V V D D D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
71 | LIU Aaron | D V D V D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
72 | CHUNG Connor | D V D D V | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
73 | FANG Eason | D V D V D D | D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
74 | GAY Jono | D V D D V D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
75 | NARDINI Nathanael P. | D D V V D D | D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
76 | KIM Kendrick | V D V D D D | D | 2.2 | 2 | -0.2 |
77 | BELL III Alfred (Tripp) R. | V D D D V D | D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
78 | YAP Kah Kai (Cayden) | D V D D D V | D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
79 | ZHAO Zhiyu | D V D D V D | D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
80 | YANG Si He | D D V D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
81 | BREGADZE NODAR | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
82 | ANDRES Michael | D V D D D | D | 2.9 | 1 | -1.9 |
83 | VUONG Kyle Ka-Him | D D V D D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
84 | SHANKWILER Christopher | D D D D V D | D | 3.5 | 1 | -2.5 |
85 | YANG Phillip | D V D D D D | D | 2.4 | 1 | -1.4 |
86 | AUTREY Adrien | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
87 | PEREIRA Beckham | D D D D D D | D | 1.5 | 0 | -1.5 |
88 | GONG Gavin | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
89 | ORLIN Edward | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
90 | SUN Andrew | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
91 | DAI Zihou | D D D D D D | D | 2.5 | 0 | -2.5 |
92 | GREMILLION Obadiah | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
---|---|---|---|
Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.