Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MUND Ruth | - | 3% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 15% | |
| 2 | XIAO julie | - | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 41% | 30% |
| 3 | TSUI Natalie | - | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 35% | 14% |
| 3 | ZENG Sarah | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% |
| 5 | CHIARELLI Valentina | - | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 40% | 14% |
| 6 | SENOGLU Irmak | - | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 29% | 10% |
| 7 | MAKLIN Sofia | - | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 36% | 17% |
| 8 | GOLDIN Nina | 6% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 8% | 1% | |
| 9 | KONDEV Elizabeth | 2% | 13% | 30% | 33% | 18% | 4% | |
| 10 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 39% | 45% |
| 11 | SCHMIDT Isabel | - | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 38% | 16% |
| 12 | LIU Yifei | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 34% | 28% | 9% |
| 13 | JEONG Katie | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 46% | 29% |
| 14 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | - | 2% | 11% | 28% | 34% | 20% | 4% |
| 15 | VINOGOROVA Sofiia | - | 2% | 10% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 5% |
| 16 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% | |
| 17 | WEI JoyAnn | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 5% |
| 18 | SO Catelyn | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 35% | 15% | |
| 19 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 2% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | |
| 20 | DIECK Miranda P. | 3% | 17% | 33% | 30% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 21 | YU Zhiang | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 6% |
| 22 | PABIAN Emilia | - | 1% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 16% | 2% |
| 23 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 1% | 6% | 20% | 32% | 28% | 12% | 2% |
| 24 | ZHANG XUANYI | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 41% |
| 25 | KINKADE Ellie | 1% | 6% | 20% | 33% | 28% | 11% | 1% |
| 26 | MALEK Zolie | 2% | 14% | 32% | 33% | 16% | 3% | |
| 27 | HUAI Delilah | 1% | 7% | 23% | 35% | 27% | 8% | |
| 28 | KNOBEL Sophia | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 29 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
| 30 | DHAR Layla | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 31 | LATYSHAVA Stephanie | 1% | 10% | 33% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 32 | FENG Alicia G. | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 33 | BERMAN greta | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 23% | 5% |
| 34 | MANN Sophia J. | 5% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 35 | YOUNG Audrey | 1% | 5% | 18% | 31% | 29% | 13% | 2% |
| 36 | KHOST Maeve | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 37 | KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 46% | 27% |
| 38 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 34% | 22% | 6% |
| 39 | HUANG Doris | 2% | 12% | 28% | 33% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 40 | BORGUETA Madison | 26% | 41% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | CHUNG Hailey | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
| 42 | STONE Coral | 2% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 43 | LOO Kaitlyn | 1% | 8% | 24% | 34% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 44 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 45 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 46 | DANTULURI Shalini | 5% | 22% | 36% | 26% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 47 | TAN Adelyn | 2% | 11% | 27% | 33% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 48 | LIU Sydney | - | 3% | 12% | 27% | 33% | 20% | 5% |
| 49 | FREEMAN Armine | 12% | 32% | 34% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 50 | HU Anna | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 51 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 14% | 34% | 33% | 15% | 4% | - | |
| 52 | SHI Julia | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 5% | |
| 53 | LIM Jaslene | 1% | 6% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 9% | |
| 54 | LIN Nicole | 4% | 18% | 33% | 30% | 13% | 2% | |
| 55 | ZOLLER Noelle | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | |
| 56 | BUSH Bethany | 2% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 19% | 5% | - |
| 57 | DUDNICK Morgan | 8% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 58 | DHAR Rana | 16% | 36% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | MOK Charlotte | - | 3% | 13% | 29% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
| 60 | LI Sonia | 6% | 22% | 33% | 26% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 61 | CHAVAN Arya | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 62 | CHAN Jolene | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 63 | CHAN Madeleine V. | 14% | 35% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
| 64 | PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari | 5% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 1% | |
| 65 | FERNANDEZ Martina | 1% | 9% | 26% | 35% | 22% | 6% | 1% |
| 66 | WANG Callie | 2% | 13% | 28% | 32% | 19% | 6% | 1% |
| 67 | CANSECO Carly | 1% | 7% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 68 | GUGALA Hanna | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 69 | TURIANO Nadelle | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 70 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | 4% | 21% | 35% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
| 71 | ZHANG Chenfei | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | |
| 72 | HO Sophia | 34% | 45% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 73 | CAO Sophie | 19% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 74 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 13% | 34% | 33% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 75 | HAN Emma | 22% | 45% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | TENG EMMA | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
| 77 | LUKER Hannah | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 78 | MEYERSON Michelle | 13% | 33% | 32% | 16% | 4% | 1% | - |
| 79 | WANG Jiayi | 38% | 40% | 17% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 80 | ZHANG Emily | 15% | 34% | 32% | 15% | 4% | - | - |
| 81 | ZAWADA Milena | 18% | 38% | 30% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.