Minneapolis, MN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | MUND Ruth | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 15% | |
| 2 | XIAO julie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 30% |
| 3 | TSUI Natalie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 49% | 14% |
| 3 | ZENG Sarah | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 17% | 3% |
| 5 | CHIARELLI Valentina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 54% | 14% |
| 6 | SENOGLU Irmak | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 73% | 39% | 10% |
| 7 | MAKLIN Sofia | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 53% | 17% |
| 8 | GOLDIN Nina | 100% | 94% | 70% | 34% | 9% | 1% | |
| 9 | KONDEV Elizabeth | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 22% | 4% | |
| 10 | TABANGAY Heartlyn | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 84% | 45% |
| 11 | SCHMIDT Isabel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 16% |
| 12 | LIU Yifei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 71% | 37% | 9% |
| 13 | JEONG Katie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 29% |
| 14 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% |
| 15 | VINOGOROVA Sofiia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 27% | 5% |
| 16 | LEMUS-IAKOVIDOU ALEXANDRA | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% | |
| 17 | WEI JoyAnn | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 5% |
| 18 | SO Catelyn | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 49% | 15% | |
| 19 | BUHAY Kirsten M. | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
| 20 | DIECK Miranda P. | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 17% | 4% | - |
| 21 | YU Zhiang | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 31% | 6% |
| 22 | PABIAN Emilia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 56% | 18% | 2% |
| 23 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 100% | 99% | 93% | 74% | 42% | 14% | 2% |
| 24 | ZHANG XUANYI | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% |
| 25 | KINKADE Ellie | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
| 26 | MALEK Zolie | 100% | 98% | 83% | 51% | 19% | 3% | |
| 27 | HUAI Delilah | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 34% | 8% | |
| 28 | KNOBEL Sophia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 29 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
| 30 | DHAR Layla | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
| 31 | LATYSHAVA Stephanie | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 32 | FENG Alicia G. | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 33 | BERMAN greta | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 34 | MANN Sophia J. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 1% | |
| 35 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 44% | 16% | 2% |
| 36 | KHOST Maeve | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 20% | 3% | - |
| 37 | KRIVOSHEEV Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 27% |
| 38 | MEDVINSKY Alexandra | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 27% | 6% |
| 39 | HUANG Doris | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 40 | BORGUETA Madison | 100% | 74% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 41 | CHUNG Hailey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 41% | 10% |
| 42 | STONE Coral | 100% | 98% | 84% | 54% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 43 | LOO Kaitlyn | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 44 | ZHOU Ruoxi ( Jasmine) | 100% | 97% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 45 | HAMMERSTROM Aria | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 46 | DANTULURI Shalini | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 47 | TAN Adelyn | 100% | 98% | 88% | 60% | 27% | 7% | 1% |
| 48 | LIU Sydney | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 25% | 5% |
| 49 | FREEMAN Armine | 100% | 88% | 56% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 50 | HU Anna | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 51 | HALPERIN Elizabeth H. | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | |
| 52 | SHI Julia | 100% | 99% | 89% | 63% | 28% | 5% | |
| 53 | LIM Jaslene | 100% | 99% | 94% | 73% | 38% | 9% | |
| 54 | LIN Nicole | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 15% | 2% | |
| 55 | ZOLLER Noelle | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 56 | BUSH Bethany | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 57 | DUDNICK Morgan | 100% | 92% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 58 | DHAR Rana | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 59 | MOK Charlotte | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 54% | 22% | 4% |
| 60 | LI Sonia | 100% | 94% | 73% | 40% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 61 | CHAVAN Arya | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 62 | CHAN Jolene | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 63 | CHAN Madeleine V. | 100% | 86% | 50% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 64 | PANTALEON-MAZOLA Amari | 100% | 95% | 73% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
| 65 | FERNANDEZ Martina | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 66 | WANG Callie | 100% | 98% | 85% | 57% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
| 67 | CANSECO Carly | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 68 | GUGALA Hanna | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 69 | TURIANO Nadelle | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 70 | SCHAIBLE Sofia L. | 100% | 96% | 75% | 39% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 71 | ZHANG Chenfei | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 33% | 7% | |
| 72 | HO Sophia | 100% | 66% | 21% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 73 | CAO Sophie | 100% | 81% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 74 | KRASOWITZ Lucy | 100% | 87% | 53% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 75 | HAN Emma | 100% | 78% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 75 | TENG EMMA | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 10% | 1% |
| 77 | LUKER Hannah | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
| 78 | MEYERSON Michelle | 100% | 87% | 54% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 79 | WANG Jiayi | 100% | 62% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 80 | ZHANG Emily | 100% | 85% | 51% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 81 | ZAWADA Milena | 100% | 82% | 44% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.