2024 Austin Challenge SYC and RCC

Youth 10 Women’s Saber (Y10WS)

Friday, December 20, 2024 at 4:00 PM

Register

Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2082 2295 - 1978
5 - 8 1892 1924 - 1866
9 - 16 1515 1740 - 1307
17 - 27 1247 1696 - 668

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Hwang, Sophie LA Fencing Academy of Pomona E24 2295 2032.20
2 Maluki, Nia Tim Morehouse Fencing Club E24 2047 1769.91
3 Cord, Sophia Premier Fencing Academy U 2008 1740.32
4 Fan, Tina LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1978 1712.96
5 Sarath, Sana Frisco Fencing Academy U 1924 1658.55
6 Liu, Isabel Spartak U 1889 1615.41
7 Cheng, Anna West Coast Fencing Academy U 1866 1608.49
8 Wei, Levana Globus Fencing Academy U 1888 1592.45
9 Kabiling, Anika Von Marie Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1740 1474.59
10 Guerville, Angelique West Coast Fencing Academy U 1650 1360.14
11 Liang, Katherine Nellya Fencers U 1614 1262.96
12 GUO, YUKI LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1542 1211.13
13 Yao, Elizabeth Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1485 1160.13
14 Yu, Sydney Phoenix Fencing Academy U 1443 1099.13
15 Son, Ellie Sabio Fencing Academy U 1339 973.16
16 Robbins, Lydia Halberstadt Fencers' Club U 1307 866.12
17 Liu, Kaylee West Coast Fencing Academy U 1176 763.73
18 Ata, Emily RedStar Fencing Club Chicago U 1176 751.41
19 Fischer, Luna Las Vegas Fencing Academy U 1179 743.57
20 zhou, kelsey West Coast Fencing Academy U 1168 743.15
21 Liu, Anya Laguna Fencing Center U 1151 729.56
22 Vines, Annie Globus Fencing Academy U 1344 691.98
23 Ku, Sophie Grace Globus Fencing Academy U 1506 579.42
24 Yien, Emma Texas Sabre Academy U 1045 43.95
25 Wang, Lorraine Sabio Fencing Academy U 1696 < 0
26 Huang, Annie Lone Star Fencing Center U 668 < 0
27 Wang, Chloe Sabio Fencing Academy U 1609 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!