2024 Austin Challenge SYC and RCC

Youth 10 Men’s Saber (Y10MS)

Saturday, December 21, 2024 at 3:30 PM

Register

Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1926 2006 - 1869
5 - 8 1786 1893 - 1714
9 - 16 1607 1740 - 1532
17 - 27 1227 1449 - 886

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Lai, Mars U 2006 1693.78
2 Salman, Ibrahim Globus Fencing Academy U 1956 1664.85
3 Rinaldi, Benigno Capital Fencing Academy U 1869 1600.15
4 Ye, Aaron LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1874 1577.59
5 Wang, James The Fencing Center U 1814 1556.98
6 Ata, Kevin RedStar Fencing Club Chicago U 1893 1555.84
7 Duff, Michael Halberstadt Fencers' Club U 1721 1455.39
8 Luo, Gavin The Fencing Center U 1714 1453.39
9 Wang, Henrik Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1715 1448.16
10 Tabancay, Cole South Bay Fencing Academy U 1669 1401.75
11 Rostholder, Ethan Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1740 1386.93
12 Qi, Zach West Coast Fencing Academy U 1537 1264.44
13 Yuan, Alan LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1542 1235.46
14 Lan, Jasper Capital Fencing Academy U 1562 1215.88
15 Yang, Aegon U 1559 1211.23
16 Oh, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1532 1143.13
17 Wu, August LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1426 1021.10
18 Guo, Aiden Globus Fencing Academy U 1343 949.12
19 Zhang, Hanzhi The Fencing Center U 1215 879.52
20 Sosa, Theodore Texas Fencing Academy U 1409 817.66
21 Kim, Christopher Sabio Fencing Academy U 1449 775.31
22 Yan, Kaysen Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1186 657.15
23 Cheng, Daniel West Coast Fencing Academy U 1317 471.06
24 Yuen, Travis Globus Fencing Academy U 1251 438.81
25 Jain, Aarambh Sabio Fencing Academy U 1012 288.35
26 Vierling, Aaron Texas Fencing Academy U 1002 < 0
27 Anup, Abhay Sabio Fencing Academy U 886 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!