2024 Austin Challenge SYC and RCC

Youth 10 Men’s Saber (Y10MS)

Saturday, December 21, 2024 at 3:30 PM

Register

Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 2044 2223 - 1896
5 - 8 1673 1872 - 1567
9 - 16 1567 1808 - 1406
17 - 27 1431 2500 - 900

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Salman, Ibrahim Globus Fencing Academy U 2011 1687.88
2 Lai, Mars U 2044 1646.92
3 Rinaldi, Benigno Capital Fencing Academy U 1896 1595.36
4 Ata, Kevin RedStar Fencing Club Chicago U 2223 1582.94
5 Ye, Aaron LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1872 1503.81
6 Wang, James The Fencing Center U 1654 1359.17
7 Duff, Michael Halberstadt Fencers' Club U 1599 1278.83
8 Tabancay, Cole South Bay Fencing Academy U 1567 1258.34
9 Qi, Zach West Coast Fencing Academy U 1580 1257.99
10 Yuan, Alan LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1586 1235.22
11 Rostholder, Ethan Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1808 1230.24
12 Wang, Henrik Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1499 1166.06
13 Oh, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1695 1163.47
14 Lan, Jasper Capital Fencing Academy U 1545 1084.00
15 Luo, Gavin The Fencing Center U 1406 1063.99
16 Yang, Aegon U 1416 954.68
17 Wu, August LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1375 888.82
18 Guo, Aiden Globus Fencing Academy U 1392 829.03
19 Sosa, Theodore Texas Fencing Academy U 1501 492.86
20 Zhang, Hanzhi The Fencing Center U 900 435.42
21 Yuen, Travis Globus Fencing Academy U 1342 378.27
22 Jain, Aarambh Sabio Fencing Academy U 1125 188.17
23 Cheng, Daniel West Coast Fencing Academy U 1384 96.42
24 Vierling, Aaron Texas Fencing Academy U 1708 74.29
25 Yan, Kaysen Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1026 4.00
26 Kim, Christopher Sabio Fencing Academy U 2500 < 0
27 Anup, Abhay Sabio Fencing Academy U 1485 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!