2024 Austin Challenge SYC and RCC

Youth 10 Men’s Saber (Y10MS)

Saturday, December 21, 2024 at 3:30 PM

Register

Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1905 1991 - 1834
5 - 8 1816 1870 - 1779
9 - 16 1615 1771 - 1468
17 - 27 1187 1390 - 691

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Lai, Mars U 1991 1684.50
2 Ye, Aaron LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1908 1621.51
3 Salman, Ibrahim Globus Fencing Academy U 1887 1610.92
4 Wang, Henrik Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1834 1575.09
5 Ata, Kevin RedStar Fencing Club Chicago U 1870 1570.27
6 Rinaldi, Benigno Capital Fencing Academy U 1819 1552.58
7 Duff, Michael Halberstadt Fencers' Club U 1796 1538.08
8 Luo, Gavin The Fencing Center U 1779 1522.66
9 Wang, James The Fencing Center U 1771 1516.37
10 Tabancay, Cole South Bay Fencing Academy U 1738 1477.40
11 Rostholder, Ethan Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1730 1409.42
12 Yang, Aegon U 1593 1273.16
13 Qi, Zach West Coast Fencing Academy U 1518 1244.89
14 Lan, Jasper Capital Fencing Academy U 1558 1243.92
15 Yuan, Alan LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1542 1235.46
16 Oh, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1468 1109.03
17 Wu, August LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1390 1017.27
18 Guo, Aiden Globus Fencing Academy U 1355 986.43
19 Zhang, Hanzhi The Fencing Center U 1259 948.50
20 Sosa, Theodore Texas Fencing Academy U 1371 818.83
21 Yan, Kaysen Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1215 765.72
22 Kim, Christopher Sabio Fencing Academy U 1356 763.11
23 Yuen, Travis Globus Fencing Academy U 1155 452.55
24 Jain, Aarambh Sabio Fencing Academy U 1028 442.13
25 Cheng, Daniel West Coast Fencing Academy U 1233 424.37
26 Vierling, Aaron Texas Fencing Academy U 1002 < 0
27 Anup, Abhay Sabio Fencing Academy U 691 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!