2024 Austin Challenge SYC and RCC

Youth 10 Men’s Saber (Y10MS)

Saturday, December 21, 2024 at 3:30 PM

Register

Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1909 1991 - 1857
5 - 8 1796 1849 - 1763
9 - 16 1600 1766 - 1498
17 - 27 1214 1449 - 886

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Lai, Mars U 1991 1684.50
2 Salman, Ibrahim Globus Fencing Academy U 1917 1634.21
3 Rinaldi, Benigno Capital Fencing Academy U 1857 1588.76
4 Ye, Aaron LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1871 1574.19
5 Wang, James The Fencing Center U 1805 1548.68
6 Ata, Kevin RedStar Fencing Club Chicago U 1849 1525.68
7 Duff, Michael Halberstadt Fencers' Club U 1763 1501.07
8 Wang, Henrik Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1765 1499.68
9 Luo, Gavin The Fencing Center U 1700 1440.81
10 Rostholder, Ethan Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1766 1439.31
11 Tabancay, Cole South Bay Fencing Academy U 1678 1413.22
12 Qi, Zach West Coast Fencing Academy U 1516 1243.89
13 Yuan, Alan LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1542 1235.46
14 Lan, Jasper Capital Fencing Academy U 1564 1234.88
15 Yang, Aegon U 1533 1193.43
16 Oh, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1498 1121.84
17 Wu, August LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1365 972.02
18 Guo, Aiden Globus Fencing Academy U 1327 937.79
19 Zhang, Hanzhi The Fencing Center U 1222 892.60
20 Sosa, Theodore Texas Fencing Academy U 1371 818.83
21 Kim, Christopher Sabio Fencing Academy U 1449 775.31
22 Yan, Kaysen Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1187 688.19
23 Yuen, Travis Globus Fencing Academy U 1219 485.51
24 Cheng, Daniel West Coast Fencing Academy U 1317 471.05
25 Jain, Aarambh Sabio Fencing Academy U 1012 288.35
26 Vierling, Aaron Texas Fencing Academy U 1002 < 0
27 Anup, Abhay Sabio Fencing Academy U 886 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!