2024 Austin Challenge SYC and RCC

Youth 10 Men’s Saber (Y10MS)

Saturday, December 21, 2024 at 3:30 PM

Register

Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1982 2043 - 1866
5 - 8 1757 1851 - 1631
9 - 16 1587 1679 - 1488
17 - 27 1257 1589 - 1052

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Salman, Ibrahim Globus Fencing Academy U 2018 1714.19
2 Lai, Mars U 2003 1674.17
3 Ata, Kevin RedStar Fencing Club Chicago U 2043 1662.49
4 Rinaldi, Benigno Capital Fencing Academy U 1866 1583.61
5 Wang, James The Fencing Center U 1808 1542.31
6 Ye, Aaron LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1851 1532.82
7 Duff, Michael Halberstadt Fencers' Club U 1737 1459.62
8 Luo, Gavin The Fencing Center U 1631 1358.21
9 Tabancay, Cole South Bay Fencing Academy U 1588 1309.43
10 Qi, Zach West Coast Fencing Academy U 1553 1272.65
11 Lan, Jasper Capital Fencing Academy U 1599 1227.98
12 Oh, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1679 1225.78
13 Yuan, Alan LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1534 1221.79
14 Yang, Aegon U 1583 1207.80
15 Rostholder, Ethan Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1670 1207.57
16 Wang, Henrik Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1488 1193.05
17 Wu, August LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1412 951.90
18 Sosa, Theodore Texas Fencing Academy U 1589 907.63
19 Guo, Aiden Globus Fencing Academy U 1294 828.10
20 Zhang, Hanzhi The Fencing Center U 1068 685.94
21 Kim, Christopher Sabio Fencing Academy U 1409 536.17
22 Yuen, Travis Globus Fencing Academy U 1296 450.14
23 Yan, Kaysen Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1124 430.24
24 Jain, Aarambh Sabio Fencing Academy U 1099 326.07
25 Cheng, Daniel West Coast Fencing Academy U 1309 308.91
26 Vierling, Aaron Texas Fencing Academy U 1052 < 0
27 Anup, Abhay Sabio Fencing Academy U 1172 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!