2024 Austin Challenge SYC and RCC

Youth 10 Men’s Saber (Y10MS)

Saturday, December 21, 2024 at 3:30 PM

Register

Round Rock Sports Center - Round Rock, TX

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1899 1936 - 1857
5 - 8 1818 1829 - 1812
9 - 16 1605 1772 - 1425
17 - 27 1184 1381 - 691

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Ye, Aaron LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1927 1652.95
2 Lai, Mars U 1936 1643.38
3 Wang, Henrik Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1877 1621.63
4 Salman, Ibrahim Globus Fencing Academy U 1857 1587.45
5 Duff, Michael Halberstadt Fencers' Club U 1829 1573.98
6 Tabancay, Cole South Bay Fencing Academy U 1812 1555.35
7 Rinaldi, Benigno Capital Fencing Academy U 1815 1552.85
8 Ata, Kevin RedStar Fencing Club Chicago U 1814 1530.11
9 Wang, James The Fencing Center U 1772 1521.91
10 Luo, Gavin The Fencing Center U 1740 1486.87
11 Rostholder, Ethan Jacksonville Fencing Club U 1682 1373.11
12 Yang, Aegon U 1609 1305.11
13 Lan, Jasper Capital Fencing Academy U 1562 1261.66
14 Qi, Zach West Coast Fencing Academy U 1508 1241.10
15 Yuan, Alan LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1542 1235.46
16 Oh, Caleb Globus Fencing Academy U 1425 1092.00
17 Wu, August LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1381 1028.34
18 Zhang, Hanzhi The Fencing Center U 1298 991.02
19 Guo, Aiden Globus Fencing Academy U 1322 980.26
20 Yan, Kaysen Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1233 856.14
21 Sosa, Theodore Texas Fencing Academy U 1371 818.83
22 Kim, Christopher Sabio Fencing Academy U 1285 733.58
23 Jain, Aarambh Sabio Fencing Academy U 1151 662.32
24 Yuen, Travis Globus Fencing Academy U 1187 607.88
25 Cheng, Daniel West Coast Fencing Academy U 1102 439.52
26 Vierling, Aaron Texas Fencing Academy U 1002 < 0
27 Anup, Abhay Sabio Fencing Academy U 691 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!