1st Annual Battle Born RYC and RJC

Youth 10 Men’s Saber (Y10MS)

Friday, December 13, 2024 at 9:30 AM

Register

Tarkanian Basketball Center - Las Vegas, NV

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1799 1925 - 1650
5 - 8 1596 1648 - 1558
9 - 16 1422 1603 - 1221
17 - 24 1316 2500 - 787

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 FU, BRANDEN South Bay Fencing Academy U 1882 1624.67
2 Ye, Aaron LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1925 1543.57
3 Chung, Evan South Bay Fencing Academy U 1739 1407.66
4 Wang, James The Fencing Center U 1650 1348.43
5 Desai, Arthav Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1648 1344.74
6 Duff, Michael Halberstadt Fencers' Club U 1598 1268.19
7 Qi, Zach West Coast Fencing Academy U 1580 1257.99
8 Ji, Derek South Bay Fencing Academy U 1558 1240.26
9 Yuan, Alan LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1603 1233.95
10 Tabancay, Cole South Bay Fencing Academy U 1540 1229.86
11 Wang, Henrik Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1491 1150.94
12 Wong, Alexander Laguna Fencing Center U 1399 1069.63
13 Luo, Gavin The Fencing Center U 1315 943.46
14 Lee, Junhu Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 1495 905.46
15 Chen, Donovan LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 1221 648.80
16 Ding, Kyen Phoenix Fencing Academy U 1309 579.79
17 Lovell, Jackson Spartak U 947 455.36
18 Lei, Isaac LA Fencing Academy of Pomona U 787 290.88
19 Zhang, Hanzhi The Fencing Center U 798 290.50
20 Chan, Ethan Phoenix Fencing Academy U 1278 17.90
21 Foust, Brandon Las Vegas Fencing Academy U 2500 < 0
22 Daum, William Avant Garde Fencers Club, Inc (CA) (AGFC) U 2500 < 0
23 Lad, Anish Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 830 < 0
24 Lee, Aidan Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) U 891 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!