Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | LU Junyao | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% | |
| 2 | LUO Ashley | - | 4% | 27% | 43% | 23% | 3% | |
| 3 | SMUK Daria A. | - | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% |
| 3 | HAN Jaewon(Leah) | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 5 | GABERKORN Nadia | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 56% |
| 6 | GU Sarah | - | - | 3% | 16% | 41% | 40% | |
| 7 | SHAO Ariel | 1% | 12% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 2% | |
| 8 | SHI Angela L. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 39% | 22% | 2% |
| 9 | DROVETSKY Alexandra M. | - | - | - | - | 3% | 25% | 71% |
| 10 | DOUGLAS Julia F. | - | - | 4% | 25% | 46% | 25% | |
| 11 | CHAN Elizabeth | - | - | 3% | 15% | 42% | 40% | |
| 12 | REID Anousheh | - | 2% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 6% | |
| 13 | ZHAO Yingying | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 42% | 16% | |
| 14 | FALLON Kyle R. | - | 2% | 21% | 44% | 29% | 4% | |
| 15 | CHANG Ella | 3% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 16 | SIDDIQUI Ammna K. | - | 5% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% | |
| 17 | BLAKE Caira | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
| 18 | CHIODI Isabella M. | 1% | 11% | 31% | 36% | 18% | 3% | |
| 19 | SAAL Anna | 1% | 7% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 6% | |
| 20 | WANG Anne | - | 1% | 8% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 7% |
| 21 | DE JAGER Celine | 1% | 6% | 23% | 35% | 26% | 8% | 1% |
| 22 | KOKES Ava | 3% | 16% | 32% | 31% | 15% | 3% | - |
| 23 | RAI Ananya | 4% | 31% | 48% | 15% | 2% | - | |
| 24 | HODGES Grace A. | - | 4% | 16% | 32% | 32% | 14% | 2% |
| 25 | EBRAHIM Ameera H. | - | 3% | 14% | 31% | 34% | 16% | 2% |
| 26 | KABRHEL Sadie | 8% | 35% | 38% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 27 | YAO Jillian | - | - | 5% | 30% | 45% | 20% | |
| 28 | LEE Anna | 39% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 29 | ZAKHAROV Anne E. | 7% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 6% | 1% | |
| 31 | GOLDBERG Sophie C. | 4% | 20% | 35% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 32 | LI AnnieSiliang | 3% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 33 | HICKS Grace | 9% | 45% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 34 | CORDERO Allison | 5% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 35 | HAND Grace | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | MING Cynthia | 6% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 4% | - | |
| 37 | LI Allison | 15% | 41% | 33% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | SCHMULTS Sophie W. | 18% | 37% | 30% | 12% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | KHITROV Samantha | 2% | 15% | 34% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 41 | GUZZI Jordan | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | APPLEBEE Andralyn | 17% | 39% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | SINGH Aayushi | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | |
| 44 | XU Jessica | 40% | 49% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
| 45 | ELLIS Sarah | 10% | 36% | 37% | 15% | 3% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.