Durham, NC - Durham, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | - | - | 3% | 17% | 44% | 36% | |
| 2 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | - | - | - | 9% | 33% | 42% | 16% |
| 3 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 60% | |
| 3 | LAHOTSKA Yahor | - | - | 4% | 25% | 51% | 20% | |
| 5 | SIMAK Jonathan V. | - | - | 3% | 29% | 61% | 7% | |
| 6 | STONE Jack V. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% |
| 7 | ROPER Evan C. | 6% | 33% | 43% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 8 | TONG ZACHARY | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 5% | |
| 9 | HOFFMAN Skyler E. | 1% | 12% | 33% | 35% | 16% | 2% | |
| 10 | DU Gavin J. | 5% | 33% | 52% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 11 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 34% | 11% | |
| 12 | BERRIO Carter E. | 2% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 2% | |
| 13 | ZHOU Kevin | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 45% | 24% |
| 14 | CHIN Matthew W. | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 41% | 21% | |
| 15 | GALLAGHER Brett | 15% | 41% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 16 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | - | - | 6% | 38% | 40% | 13% | 1% |
| 17 | BALDWIN Michael B. | 24% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 18 | GHENEA George Philipe | 7% | 31% | 39% | 19% | 3% | - | |
| 18 | MOL Spencer | 5% | 26% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - | |
| 20 | DESHETLER Scott | 21% | 43% | 29% | 7% | - | - | |
| 21 | FORT David | 7% | 30% | 38% | 20% | 5% | - | |
| 22 | JIANG Kevin | 49% | 41% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 23 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 7% | 33% | 43% | 16% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | COX Luis E. | 45% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 25 | ANTHONY Silas | 9% | 47% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.