Durham, NC - Durham, NC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BUKOWSKI Bronson | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | |
| 2 | BENAVRAM Lev C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 91% | 58% | 16% |
| 3 | CHAMBERS Amir E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | |
| 3 | LAHOTSKA Yahor | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 20% | |
| 5 | SIMAK Jonathan V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 69% | 7% | |
| 6 | STONE Jack V. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 35% | 7% |
| 7 | ROPER Evan C. | 100% | 94% | 61% | 18% | 2% | - | |
| 8 | TONG ZACHARY | 100% | 100% | 96% | 75% | 33% | 5% | |
| 9 | HOFFMAN Skyler E. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 54% | 19% | 2% | |
| 10 | DU Gavin J. | 100% | 95% | 62% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
| 11 | GREENBAUM Ian L. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 45% | 11% | |
| 12 | BERRIO Carter E. | 100% | 98% | 82% | 46% | 14% | 2% | |
| 13 | ZHOU Kevin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 69% | 24% |
| 14 | CHIN Matthew W. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 21% | |
| 15 | GALLAGHER Brett | 100% | 85% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 16 | NAZLYMOV Andrei | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 55% | 14% | 1% |
| 17 | BALDWIN Michael B. | 100% | 76% | 31% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 18 | GHENEA George Philipe | 100% | 93% | 62% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 18 | MOL Spencer | 100% | 95% | 69% | 30% | 6% | - | |
| 20 | DESHETLER Scott | 100% | 79% | 36% | 7% | - | - | |
| 21 | FORT David | 100% | 93% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | |
| 22 | JIANG Kevin | 100% | 51% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 23 | CHAVES Matthew J. | 100% | 93% | 60% | 17% | 1% | - | |
| 24 | COX Luis E. | 100% | 55% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 25 | ANTHONY Silas | 100% | 91% | 44% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.