Henrich Center for Fencing and Intl Sport - Austin, TX, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | FREIMAN Samuel (Sam) E. | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 36% | 55% |
2 | FRENCH Timothy | - | - | 2% | 16% | 42% | 32% | 7% |
3 | ODEN Isaac M. | 4% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 11% | 1% | |
3 | SANCHEZ Emanuel | 1% | 8% | 26% | 36% | 23% | 6% | < 1% |
5 | MOREAU John A. | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% |
5 | BROWN Allan | 1% | 9% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 5% | - |
7 | THAYER Jake T. | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 47% | |
8 | DALRYMPLE Sr. Ronald W. | 1% | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
9 | KASKAN Peter E. | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 32% | 5% |
9 | ZUBECK Dominic | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
11 | HUDSON Ryan | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 2% | |
12 | PHILLIPS Wesley Y. | - | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 24% | 5% |
13 | KORTZ Austin | - | 1% | 11% | 36% | 39% | 12% | 1% |
14 | VUCINOVICH Brandon | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% |
15 | OBREBSKI Kevin | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
16 | VAN VACTER Thomas | 28% | 48% | 20% | 3% | - | - | - |
17 | MASK Austin | 1% | 11% | 32% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - |
18 | BISSET Journey | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | |
19 | GRINBERG Ethan | 3% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | - |
20 | MEEDER Logan | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 7% | - |
21 | VAN VACTER Madelynn | 13% | 35% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - | |
22 | SPARKS Shaun | 23% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
22 | GOULD Jonas | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 12% | 1% |
24 | ALVAREZ Natalie | 24% | 40% | 26% | 9% | 2% | - | - |
25 | LAING Flynt | 7% | 46% | 35% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
26 | WILLIAMS Eric | 4% | 23% | 39% | 27% | 7% | - | |
27 | ABAD carlos | 4% | 24% | 41% | 25% | 4% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.