January NAC

Veteran 40-49 Men’s Foil (V40MF)

Friday, January 3, 2025 at 10:00 AM

Register

Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3236 3459 - 2769
5 - 8 2896 3069 - 2651
9 - 16 2368 2932 - 1811
17 - 25 1521 1992 - 1031

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Pai, Dong-Ying Twin Cities Fencing Club A25 3459 3138.43
2 Jan, Stephen B25 3452 3035.25
3 Junco, Carlos B24 3264 2677.62
4 Flanagan, James Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club B24 2769 2458.77
5 Wood, Alexander Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. B25 2966 2448.61
6 Lane, Mitchell Fencing Club Asheville C24 2900 2310.31
7 Volkov, ALeksandr Sr Auburn Fencing Club C25 3069 2237.23
8 Green, Michael Brooklyn Bridge Fencing Club C21 2651 2010.55
9 Miller, Douglas RedStar Fencing Club Chicago C25 2539 1999.21
10 Kreidman, Michael New Jersey Fencing Alliance C24 2625 1983.10
11 Gonzalez, Eric Lincoln Fencing Club C24 2705 1898.94
12 Jalbert, Jean-Francois C25 2932 1787.29
13 Tomasi, John Smokey Mountain Fencing D25 2084 1725.82
14 Bhatt, Jay West Berkeley Fencing Club D24 1981 1595.98
15 Pho, Eric Fencers Club Inc. D24 2265 1441.72
16 Wu, Jingxiao Rain City Fencing Center D24 1811 1401.64
17 Clippard, Erik Center for Blade Arts E24 1668 1217.80
18 RODRIGUEZ, VINCENT San Diego Fencing Center E24 1619 1215.86
19 Duane, Michael New Jersey Fencing Alliance U 1992 1010.92
20 Gardner, William Boise Fencing Club E25 1709 999.60
21 MCCONKEY, Eric Heartland Fencing Academy E23 1498 659.82
22 Holcomb, Michael Northwest Fencing Center U 1031 587.64
23 Frost, Talon Epic Fencing Club E25 1201 392.04
24 Gregoire, Jean-Charles Ottawa Fencing U 1906 66.87
25 Williams, Brian AZ United Fencing Club U 1066 25.59

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!