January NAC

Veteran 40-49 Men’s Foil (V40MF)

Friday, January 3, 2025 at 10:00 AM

Register

Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3240 3470 - 2769
5 - 8 2892 3069 - 2651
9 - 16 2381 2932 - 1811
17 - 25 1541 1906 - 1084

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Pai, Dong-Ying Twin Cities Fencing Club A25 3455 3130.00
2 Jan, Stephen B25 3470 3042.81
3 Junco, Carlos B24 3264 2677.62
4 Flanagan, James Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club B24 2769 2458.77
5 Wood, Alexander Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. B25 2949 2414.31
6 Lane, Mitchell Fencing Club Asheville C24 2900 2310.31
7 Volkov, ALeksandr Sr Auburn Fencing Club C25 3069 2237.23
8 Green, Michael Brooklyn Bridge Fencing Club C21 2651 2010.55
9 Kreidman, Michael New Jersey Fencing Alliance C24 2661 1996.12
10 Miller, Douglas RedStar Fencing Club Chicago C25 2536 1988.26
11 Gonzalez, Eric Lincoln Fencing Club C24 2705 1898.94
12 Jalbert, Jean-Francois C25 2932 1787.29
13 Tomasi, John Smokey Mountain Fencing D25 2085 1708.66
14 Pho, Eric Fencers Club Inc. D24 2413 1524.44
15 Bhatt, Jay West Berkeley Fencing Club D24 1907 1501.39
16 Wu, Jingxiao Rain City Fencing Center D24 1811 1401.64
17 Clippard, Erik Center for Blade Arts E24 1836 1322.48
18 RODRIGUEZ, VINCENT San Diego Fencing Center E24 1651 1242.66
19 Gardner, William Boise Fencing Club E25 1672 907.16
20 Duane, Michael New Jersey Fencing Alliance U 1815 723.92
21 MCCONKEY, Eric Heartland Fencing Academy E23 1586 688.97
22 Holcomb, Michael Northwest Fencing Center U 1084 622.86
23 Frost, Talon Epic Fencing Club E25 1208 390.75
24 Gregoire, Jean-Charles Ottawa Fencing U 1906 66.87
25 Williams, Brian AZ United Fencing Club U 1115 28.66

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!