January NAC

Veteran 40-49 Men’s Foil (V40MF)

Friday, January 3, 2025 at 10:00 AM

Register

Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3208 3602 - 2887
5 - 8 2864 3069 - 2717
9 - 16 2359 2932 - 1811
17 - 25 1560 1992 - 997

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Jan, Stephen B25 3602 3242.22
2 Pai, Dong-Ying Twin Cities Fencing Club A25 3410 3094.75
3 Wood, Alexander Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. B25 2887 2440.22
4 Junco, Carlos B24 2933 2437.58
5 Flanagan, James Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club B24 2717 2416.88
6 Lane, Mitchell Fencing Club Asheville C24 2900 2310.31
7 Volkov, ALeksandr Sr Auburn Fencing Club C25 3069 2237.23
8 Green, Michael Brooklyn Bridge Fencing Club C21 2772 2234.91
9 Gonzalez, Eric Lincoln Fencing Club C24 2769 2013.40
10 Kreidman, Michael New Jersey Fencing Alliance C24 2625 1983.10
11 Miller, Douglas RedStar Fencing Club Chicago C25 2401 1917.32
12 Tomasi, John Smokey Mountain Fencing D25 2192 1860.87
13 Jalbert, Jean-Francois C25 2932 1787.29
14 Bhatt, Jay West Berkeley Fencing Club D24 1934 1567.88
15 Pho, Eric Fencers Club Inc. D24 2206 1419.43
16 Wu, Jingxiao Rain City Fencing Center D24 1811 1401.64
17 Gardner, William Boise Fencing Club E25 1962 1350.23
18 RODRIGUEZ, VINCENT San Diego Fencing Center E24 1713 1349.84
19 Clippard, Erik Center for Blade Arts E24 1617 1198.78
20 Duane, Michael New Jersey Fencing Alliance U 1992 1010.92
21 MCCONKEY, Eric Heartland Fencing Academy E23 1595 797.53
22 Holcomb, Michael Northwest Fencing Center U 997 602.36
23 Frost, Talon Epic Fencing Club E25 1201 392.04
24 Gregoire, Jean-Charles Ottawa Fencing U 1906 66.87
25 Williams, Brian AZ United Fencing Club U 1060 29.46

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!