January NAC

Veteran 40-49 Men’s Foil (V40MF)

Friday, January 3, 2025 at 10:00 AM

Register

Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3242 3486 - 3007
5 - 8 2864 3069 - 2717
9 - 16 2346 2932 - 1811
17 - 25 1527 1992 - 1000

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Pai, Dong-Ying Twin Cities Fencing Club A25 3420 3102.58
2 Jan, Stephen B25 3486 3101.18
3 Wood, Alexander Fencing Sports Academy, Inc. B25 3007 2531.25
4 Junco, Carlos B24 3055 2517.42
5 Flanagan, James Youth Enrichment League Fencing Club B24 2717 2413.34
6 Lane, Mitchell Fencing Club Asheville C24 2900 2310.31
7 Volkov, ALeksandr Sr Auburn Fencing Club C25 3069 2237.23
8 Gonzalez, Eric Lincoln Fencing Club C24 2769 2013.40
9 Green, Michael Brooklyn Bridge Fencing Club C21 2651 2010.55
10 Kreidman, Michael New Jersey Fencing Alliance C24 2625 1983.10
11 Miller, Douglas RedStar Fencing Club Chicago C25 2456 1934.52
12 Jalbert, Jean-Francois C25 2932 1787.29
13 Tomasi, John Smokey Mountain Fencing D25 2095 1739.72
14 Bhatt, Jay West Berkeley Fencing Club D24 1988 1604.95
15 Pho, Eric Fencers Club Inc. D24 2206 1419.43
16 Wu, Jingxiao Rain City Fencing Center D24 1811 1401.64
17 RODRIGUEZ, VINCENT San Diego Fencing Center E24 1722 1357.03
18 Clippard, Erik Center for Blade Arts E24 1600 1168.92
19 Duane, Michael New Jersey Fencing Alliance U 1992 1010.92
20 Gardner, William Boise Fencing Club E25 1666 980.24
21 MCCONKEY, Eric Heartland Fencing Academy E23 1595 797.53
22 Holcomb, Michael Northwest Fencing Center U 1000 587.60
23 Frost, Talon Epic Fencing Club E25 1201 392.04
24 Gregoire, Jean-Charles Ottawa Fencing U 1906 66.87
25 Williams, Brian AZ United Fencing Club U 1060 29.46

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!