Mid-TN Expo - Murfreesbor, TN, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WONG Garrick G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
| 2 | ROSE Ben | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 63% | 19% |
| 3 | LOVE Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 31% | |
| 3 | TANG Albert | 100% | 100% | 98% | 83% | 42% | 8% | |
| 5 | WILLIAMS Connor J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 35% | |
| 6 | SAGE Michael P. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 34% | |
| 7 | ALONSO Vinicius | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 35% | 8% | 1% |
| 8 | WECHSLER Jacob | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 62% | 18% | |
| 9 | NEYMAN Sampson | 100% | 98% | 82% | 49% | 16% | 2% | |
| 10 | TIYA BIAYA K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 26% |
| 11 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 76% | 27% | |
| 12 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 81% | 37% | |
| 13 | WANG Brayden | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% | |
| 14 | DE COQUET Maximilian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 76% | 28% | 4% | |
| 15 | DRESSEL Jet | 100% | 99% | 88% | 52% | 16% | 2% | |
| 16 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 74% | 30% | 5% | |
| 17 | SONG Austin | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 41% | 8% | |
| 18 | HEARN Christen J. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 57% | 15% | |
| 19 | ZOU Yuming | 100% | 100% | 95% | 53% | 12% | 1% | |
| 20 | BOYKO Miles | 100% | 98% | 80% | 34% | 7% | - | |
| 21 | YANG Ethan J. | 100% | 58% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 22 | DING Albert | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 57% | 23% | 4% |
| 23 | ZHANG Alex | 100% | 90% | 54% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 24 | DANIZ FERNANDO A. | 100% | 89% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | |
| 25 | IVANENKO Alex | 100% | 98% | 86% | 53% | 18% | 2% | |
| 26 | GOKCE Ellis | 100% | 63% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 27 | DANG Tyler | 100% | 99% | 87% | 57% | 20% | 3% | |
| 28 | FAN Yuchen | 100% | 67% | 24% | 4% | - | - | |
| 29 | PILGRIM Ether | 100% | 73% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 30 | LIM Joel | 100% | 46% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 31 | HARGRAVES Henry | 100% | 75% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
| 32 | DING Tommy | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | 19% | 2% | |
| 33 | MORRISON Eddie | 100% | 96% | 65% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 34 | DONG Joshua | 100% | 90% | 56% | 21% | 4% | - | |
| 35 | MITCHELL Henry | 100% | 69% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | ZHANG Bryan | 100% | 96% | 66% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
| 37 | CHAKRAVARTY Amrik | 100% | 32% | 1% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.