January NAC

Veteran 40-49 Men’s Saber (V40MS)

Saturday, January 4, 2025 at 2:00 PM

Register

Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3309 3671 - 3072
5 - 8 2742 3041 - 2564
9 - 16 2417 2680 - 2185
17 - 25 1735 2096 - 1333

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Kallio, Jeffrey Forge Fencing Teams DUR A23 3313 2933.83
2 Refaee, Ahmed Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) C25 3671 2887.30
3 Ferraro, Pietro Capital Fencing Academy A24 3181 2805.42
4 Tsung, David Manhattan Fencing Center B24 3072 2583.44
5 Greene, Joseph Denver Fencing Center B25 3041 2470.99
6 Terentiev, Max Fencing Academy Of Westchester A24 2657 2362.58
7 Seidel, Jonathan Manchen Academy Of Fencing B24 2705 2274.24
8 Liu, Jerry New York Athletic Club A24 2564 2238.68
9 zhu, Shirui Lone Star Fencing Center E25 2680 2233.83
10 Robles, Julio Capital Fencing Academy B24 2554 2174.18
11 Chang, William Capital Fencing Academy C24 2526 2055.98
12 Chen, Yuan LA Fencing Academy of Pomona D24 2404 1980.12
13 Dirsmith, Benjamin Salle Auriol Seattle B25 2258 1963.25
14 Miller, Douglas RedStar Fencing Club Chicago D24 2486 1934.36
15 Plonka, Derek Avant Garde Fencers Club, Inc (CA) (AGFC) D25 2243 1857.98
16 Zong, Yujie Zeta Fencing D25 2185 1851.73
17 Sutherland, Richard Miracle Fencing Club E24 2041 1667.02
18 Maurel, Nicolas Capital Fencing Academy E25 2096 1505.97
19 Moody, Paul Salle Auriol Seattle E24 1773 1429.36
20 Wang, Albert Fencing Academy Of Denver U 1787 1307.38
21 Mills, Matthew Capital Fencing Academy E23 1770 1234.05
22 Brown, Jeremy Spartak U 1523 960.00
23 Herndon, Jameson Nashville Academy of Fencing U 1792 867.97
24 Pinto, Augusto Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1503 772.52
25 Williams, Brian AZ United Fencing Club U 1333 218.73

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!