January NAC

Veteran 40-49 Men’s Saber (V40MS)

Saturday, January 4, 2025 at 2:00 PM

Register

Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3331 3671 - 3129
5 - 8 2758 3052 - 2606
9 - 16 2330 2658 - 2022
17 - 25 1756 2306 - 1444

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Kallio, Jeffrey Forge Fencing Teams DUR A23 3333 2947.17
2 Refaee, Ahmed Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) C25 3671 2887.30
3 Ferraro, Pietro Capital Fencing Academy A24 3192 2789.89
4 Tsung, David Manhattan Fencing Center B24 3129 2620.43
5 Greene, Joseph Denver Fencing Center B25 3052 2422.81
6 Terentiev, Max Fencing Academy Of Westchester A24 2645 2343.27
7 Seidel, Jonathan Manchen Academy Of Fencing B24 2728 2232.14
8 Robles, Julio Capital Fencing Academy B24 2606 2217.81
9 zhu, Shirui Lone Star Fencing Center E25 2658 2186.38
10 Liu, Jerry New York Athletic Club A24 2429 2081.14
11 Chang, William Capital Fencing Academy C24 2529 2038.22
12 Dirsmith, Benjamin Salle Auriol Seattle B25 2273 1974.57
13 Plonka, Derek Avant Garde Fencers Club, Inc (CA) (AGFC) D25 2292 1892.30
14 Chen, Yuan LA Fencing Academy of Pomona D24 2392 1878.02
15 Sutherland, Richard Miracle Fencing Club E24 2045 1669.84
16 Zong, Yujie Zeta Fencing D25 2022 1655.19
17 Miller, Douglas RedStar Fencing Club Chicago D24 2306 1642.70
18 Maurel, Nicolas Capital Fencing Academy E25 2132 1525.68
19 Moody, Paul Salle Auriol Seattle E24 1794 1440.15
20 Wang, Albert Fencing Academy Of Denver U 1789 1301.51
21 Brown, Jeremy Spartak U 1555 936.73
22 Mills, Matthew Capital Fencing Academy E23 1521 875.81
23 Herndon, Jameson Nashville Academy of Fencing U 1792 867.97
24 Pinto, Augusto Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1469 677.66
25 Williams, Brian AZ United Fencing Club U 1444 230.57

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!