January NAC

Veteran 40-49 Men’s Saber (V40MS)

Saturday, January 4, 2025 at 2:00 PM

Register

Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3316 3671 - 3089
5 - 8 2736 3041 - 2566
9 - 16 2414 2651 - 2167
17 - 25 1734 2096 - 1444

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Kallio, Jeffrey Forge Fencing Teams DUR A23 3313 2933.83
2 Refaee, Ahmed Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) C25 3671 2887.30
3 Ferraro, Pietro Capital Fencing Academy A24 3190 2801.89
4 Tsung, David Manhattan Fencing Center B24 3089 2591.74
5 Greene, Joseph Denver Fencing Center B25 3041 2470.99
6 Terentiev, Max Fencing Academy Of Westchester A24 2657 2362.58
7 zhu, Shirui Lone Star Fencing Center E25 2680 2233.83
8 Robles, Julio Capital Fencing Academy B24 2566 2183.29
9 Seidel, Jonathan Manchen Academy Of Fencing B24 2651 2179.21
10 Liu, Jerry New York Athletic Club A24 2482 2140.87
11 Chang, William Capital Fencing Academy C24 2526 2055.98
12 Miller, Douglas RedStar Fencing Club Chicago D24 2570 1997.67
13 Dirsmith, Benjamin Salle Auriol Seattle B25 2263 1967.14
14 Chen, Yuan LA Fencing Academy of Pomona D24 2363 1910.05
15 Plonka, Derek Avant Garde Fencers Club, Inc (CA) (AGFC) D25 2293 1901.44
16 Zong, Yujie Zeta Fencing D25 2167 1832.91
17 Sutherland, Richard Miracle Fencing Club E24 2045 1669.84
18 Maurel, Nicolas Capital Fencing Academy E25 2096 1505.97
19 Moody, Paul Salle Auriol Seattle E24 1806 1457.50
20 Wang, Albert Fencing Academy Of Denver U 1787 1307.38
21 Brown, Jeremy Spartak U 1564 980.20
22 Mills, Matthew Capital Fencing Academy E23 1568 941.79
23 Herndon, Jameson Nashville Academy of Fencing U 1792 867.97
24 Pinto, Augusto Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1503 772.52
25 Williams, Brian AZ United Fencing Club U 1444 230.57

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!