January NAC

Veteran 40-49 Men’s Saber (V40MS)

Saturday, January 4, 2025 at 2:00 PM

Register

Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3314 3671 - 3089
5 - 8 2740 3041 - 2582
9 - 16 2426 2676 - 2185
17 - 25 1726 2096 - 1333

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Kallio, Jeffrey Forge Fencing Teams DUR A23 3313 2933.83
2 Refaee, Ahmed Southern California Fencing Academy (SOCALFA) C25 3671 2887.30
3 Ferraro, Pietro Capital Fencing Academy A24 3181 2805.42
4 Tsung, David Manhattan Fencing Center B24 3089 2591.74
5 Greene, Joseph Denver Fencing Center B25 3041 2470.99
6 Terentiev, Max Fencing Academy Of Westchester A24 2657 2362.58
7 Liu, Jerry New York Athletic Club A24 2582 2253.05
8 zhu, Shirui Lone Star Fencing Center E25 2680 2233.83
9 Seidel, Jonathan Manchen Academy Of Fencing B24 2676 2213.48
10 Robles, Julio Capital Fencing Academy B24 2554 2174.18
11 Chang, William Capital Fencing Academy C24 2526 2055.98
12 Dirsmith, Benjamin Salle Auriol Seattle B25 2282 1985.89
13 Chen, Yuan LA Fencing Academy of Pomona D24 2404 1980.12
14 Miller, Douglas RedStar Fencing Club Chicago D24 2486 1934.36
15 Plonka, Derek Avant Garde Fencers Club, Inc (CA) (AGFC) D25 2293 1901.44
16 Zong, Yujie Zeta Fencing D25 2185 1851.73
17 Sutherland, Richard Miracle Fencing Club E24 2041 1667.02
18 Maurel, Nicolas Capital Fencing Academy E25 2096 1505.97
19 Moody, Paul Salle Auriol Seattle E24 1806 1457.50
20 Wang, Albert Fencing Academy Of Denver U 1787 1307.38
21 Mills, Matthew Capital Fencing Academy E23 1656 1056.55
22 Brown, Jeremy Spartak U 1523 960.00
23 Herndon, Jameson Nashville Academy of Fencing U 1792 867.97
24 Pinto, Augusto Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1503 772.52
25 Williams, Brian AZ United Fencing Club U 1333 218.73

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!