January NAC

Veteran 40-49 Men’s Saber (V40MS)

Saturday, January 4, 2025 at 12:00 AM

Register

Kansas City Convention Center - Kansas City, MO

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 3428 3626 - 3218
5 - 8 2565 2839 - 2403
9 - 16 2190 2440 - 1814
17 - 25 1680 2087 - 1295

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Kallio, Jeffrey Forge Fencing Teams DUR A23 3526 3078.37
2 Tsung, David Manhattan Fencing Center B23 3341 2706.78
3 Ferraro, Pietro Capital Fencing Academy A24 3218 2693.88
4 Refaee, Ahmed Tim Morehouse Fencing Club C23 3626 2578.37
5 Seidel, Jonathan Manchen Academy Of Fencing B24 2839 2315.22
6 Terentiev, Max Fencing Academy Of Westchester A24 2450 2114.33
7 Robles, Julio Capital Fencing Academy B24 2567 2075.87
8 Liu, Jerry New York Athletic Club C24 2403 2029.02
9 Dirsmith, Benjamin Salle Auriol Seattle C24 2258 1925.88
10 Plonka, Derek Avant Garde Fencers Club, Inc (CA) (AGFC) D24 2282 1846.64
11 Chen, Yuan LA Fencing Academy of Pomona D24 2440 1836.47
12 Chang, William Capital Fencing Academy C24 2337 1648.90
13 Sutherland, Richard Miracle Fencing Club E24 2070 1637.90
14 Moody, Paul Salle Auriol Seattle E24 1814 1444.21
15 Miller, Douglas RedStar Fencing Club Chicago D24 2193 1412.45
16 Maurel, Nicolas Capital Fencing Academy E23 2127 1383.01
17 Zong, Yujie Zeta Fencing E24 1840 1334.56
18 zhu, Shirui Lone Star Fencing Center U 1879 1204.92
19 Wang, Albert Fencing Academy Of Denver U 1671 1129.91
20 Brown, Jeremy Spartak U 1661 906.63
21 Herndon, Jameson Nashville Academy of Fencing U 1776 562.52
22 Pinto, Augusto Tim Morehouse Fencing Club U 1466 526.09
23 Mills, Matthew Capital Fencing Academy E23 1295 339.37
24 Williams, Brian AZ United Fencing Club U 1449 225.61
25 Greene, Joseph Denver Fencing Center E22 2087 114.33

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!