Mid-TN Expo - Murfreesbor, TN, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | BROWN Hannah | - | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 22% |
2 | DONGES Anna | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 36% | 31% | 9% |
3 | KUMAR Anusha | - | - | 3% | 19% | 50% | 29% | |
3 | NEELAM Navya | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 17% | 3% | |
5 | NIX Reagan | - | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 11% | |
6 | VICKERMAN Sofia | - | 4% | 14% | 28% | 32% | 18% | 4% |
7 | VICKERMAN Lilly | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 3% |
8 | LI Suri | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
9 | PATIL Amulya | - | - | 1% | 12% | 46% | 41% | |
10 | WANG Zarina | 3% | 15% | 30% | 30% | 17% | 5% | 1% |
11 | REEVES Ruby | 2% | 10% | 26% | 33% | 22% | 7% | 1% |
12 | VICKERMAN Aspen | 3% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
13 | NEELAM Neha | - | 1% | 5% | 16% | 32% | 33% | 14% |
14 | ZIMMERMAN Karmen | 1% | 9% | 23% | 32% | 24% | 9% | 1% |
15 | KIM Emily | 23% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - | - | |
16 | MUELLER Kaitlin | - | 3% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
17 | MOYNIHAN Jones | 1% | 11% | 31% | 35% | 18% | 4% | - |
18 | FORDER Isabel | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 2% | - | |
19 | BRITTON Kiera | 17% | 42% | 30% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
20 | WALTER Anna | 1% | 13% | 36% | 38% | 11% | 1% | |
21 | LOZIER Grace | 18% | 41% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - | |
22 | OKI POMEROY Sydney | 4% | 18% | 35% | 30% | 12% | 2% | |
23 | RHEINECKER Claire | 4% | 18% | 32% | 29% | 14% | 3% | - |
24 | SNYDER Kathryn | 6% | 23% | 33% | 25% | 10% | 2% | - |
25 | FRAIJ Laila | 40% | 43% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
26 | MEHDI Inaaya | 31% | 43% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.