Mid-TN Expo - Murfreesbor, TN, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | ELWOOD Sebastian F. | V V V D V | V V V V V | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 2 | LOVE Aaron | V V V D V | V V V V D | 4.5 | 4 | -0.5 |
| 3 | QIAN Jason H. | V V V V V | V V D | 4.2 | 5 | +0.8 |
| 3 | WONG Garrick G. | V V V V D | V V V D | 4.6 | 4 | -0.6 |
| 5 | ROSE Ben | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.4 | 6 | +0.6 |
| 6 | TANG Albert | V V V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 5 | +1.2 |
| 7 | DE COQUET Maximilian | D V V V V | V V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 8 | HEARN Christen J. | V V D V V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 9 | ALONSO Vinicius | V V V V V | V | 3.6 | 5 | +1.4 |
| 10 | WANG Brayden | V V D V V V | V D | 4.4 | 5 | +0.6 |
| 11 | SAGE Michael P. | D V V V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 12 | LORENZO Alejandro | V V V V D | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 13 | TANG August L. | V V D V V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 14 | BOYKO Miles | V D V V D V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 15 | SONG Austin | V D V V D | V D | 3.6 | 3 | -0.6 |
| 16 | NEYMAN Sampson | D D V V V | V D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 17 | ZOU Yuming | V V D V V | D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 18 | TANG Alexander L. | V D D V V | D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 19 | IVANENKO Alex | V D V D V | D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 20 | DANIZ FERNANDO A. | D V V V D | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 21 | THIYAGARAJAA Ari | D V V D V | D | 2.3 | 3 | +0.7 |
| 22 | TWEMLOW Sacha | D V D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 23 | ALVAREZ ADRIAN ALEJANDRO | D D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 24 | FAN Yuchen | D V D D V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 25 | GOKCE Ellis | V D D D V | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 26 | HARGRAVES Henry | D D V V D | V D | 1.3 | 2 | +0.7 |
| 27 | DING Tommy | V V D D D | V D | 2.5 | 2 | -0.5 |
| 28 | YANG Ethan J. | V D V D D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 29 | ZHANG Alex | D D V V D D | V | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 30 | JOHNSON Soren | V D D D D | V D | 1.4 | 1 | -0.4 |
| 31 | PHAN Henry | D D D D V | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 32 | HADDADIN Karam | D V D D D D | V D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 33 | SU Daniel | V D V D D | D | 1.2 | 2 | +0.8 |
| 34 | DING Albert | D V D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 35 | LIM Joel | D D D V D | D | 0.8 | 1 | +0.2 |
| 36 | ZHANG Bryan | D V D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 37 | REDONDO Tomas D. | D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 38 | CAO Kellen | D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
| 39 | KEITH Jakhari | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 40 | CHAKRAVARTY Amrik | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 40 | GADIYARAM Madhav | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 42 | KIMURA Ryo | D D D D D | D | 0.6 | 0 | -0.6 |
| 43 | FIGUEROA Vincent | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.