Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | ZHENG Ivy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 31% |
| 2 | SHI Haoqing | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 6% |
| 3 | WANG Ellen | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 29% |
| 3 | HE Fenghuan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 5 | JANG Kimberley | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 48% | 13% | 1% |
| 6 | JING Emily | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 69% | 26% |
| 7 | OUYANG Bridgette Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 26% |
| 8 | CHEN Allison V. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 69% | 32% | 6% |
| 9 | PO Edith | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 18% | 2% |
| 10 | SHEN Sophia H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% |
| 11 | LEE Bethany W. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 12 | BOODELL Ella | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 50% | 12% |
| 13 | HO Brianna W. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 75% | 34% | 6% |
| 14 | ZHANG Alina C. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 58% | 17% |
| 15 | KOENIG Charlotte R. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
| 16 | FERRETTI Anna Rebecca | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 45% | 11% |
| 17 | PATEL Anika | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 43% | 11% |
| 18 | LIAO Lu Jia (Lucy) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 33% | 7% |
| 19 | SHAW Kayla M. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 53% | 19% | 3% |
| 20 | CHUSID Mikayla | 100% | 99% | 88% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
| 21 | SADAN Jordan E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 67% | 24% |
| 22 | LUNG Katerina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 27% |
| 23 | KANIUK Rachel | 100% | 97% | 74% | 24% | 3% | - | - |
| 24 | TAN Kaitlyn N. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% |
| 25 | LEE Alison | 100% | 94% | 62% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 26 | WONG Sophia M. | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 39% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | SHEN Lydia | 100% | 100% | 97% | 70% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 28 | YU Lauren C. | 100% | 82% | 42% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
| 29 | ZHAO Aileen Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 28% | 5% |
| 30 | ZHANG Rongrui | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 14% | 2% |
| 31 | ACHILOVA Feyza | 100% | 97% | 78% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 32 | HOLLE Aviella S. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
| 33 | CHO Lorin Y. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 37% | 10% | 1% |
| 34 | BASSON Bayley D. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 35 | DRANOVSKY Dasha | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 49% | 12% |
| 36 | MILLER Naomi E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 65% | 25% | 4% |
| 37 | SRIVASTAVA Palak | 100% | 90% | 59% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 38 | LIU Sophia | 100% | 99% | 81% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 39 | ZHEN Ellen | 100% | 83% | 29% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 40 | NICOU Melina | 100% | 97% | 71% | 19% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | COSTELLO Angeline S. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 70% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 42 | LI Rachel Y. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 49% | 13% | 1% |
| 43 | PARK Caitlyn | 100% | 60% | 11% | - | - | - | - |
| 44 | LOGAN Jade | 100% | 63% | 22% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 46 | BHOGAL Sukhneet | 100% | 69% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - |
| 47 | MEYER Claudia | 100% | 94% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 48 | KARKHANIS Maya | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 49 | NICOLL Kathryn | 100% | 44% | 7% | - | - | - | - |
| 50 | MCKEE Alexandra K. | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 51 | PAVE Claire | 100% | 92% | 51% | 15% | 2% | - | - |
| 52 | YANIV Liya | 100% | 42% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | TOBIN Brean | 100% | 51% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 54 | ROCCA Mary J. | 100% | 42% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | FRAY-WITZER Ava | 100% | 82% | 37% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 55 | CUNNINGHAM Kelsey | 100% | 90% | 53% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.