Fencing Center of Chicago RYC & RJC

Youth 10 Men’s Foil (Y10MF)

Saturday, April 5, 2025 at 12:00 PM

Register

Canlan Sports - Barrington, IL 60010, IL

Strength distribution

Rank Average Range
1 - 4 1770 1901 - 1640
5 - 8 1628 1788 - 1467
9 - 16 1487 2016 - 948
17 - 28 1678 2500 - 714

Note: You can compare your strength to the ranges shown above to estimate where you're expected to finish in this event. Of course, strength numbers are not perfect predictors of future performance!

Registrations

Rank1 Name Club Rating Strength Conservative Estimate2
1 Zheng, Lerui Renaissance Fencing Club U 1864 1602.57
2 Xu, Jason Renaissance Fencing Club U 1673 1356.87
3 Liu, Charles RedStar Fencing Club Chicago U 1901 1354.81
4 Jiao, Daniel Renaissance Fencing Club U 1640 1340.88
5 Huang, Lucas The Fencers Academy U 1788 1316.31
6 Maddes, Gage Renaissance Fencing Club U 1530 1223.23
7 Kanan, Noland Renaissance Fencing Club U 1726 1115.76
8 PalmerKlein, Justin Bronzeville Fencing Academy U 1467 1039.51
9 Gullapalli, Shrihaan The Fencers Academy U 1783 941.20
10 Lim, Cayden Queen City Fencers Club LLC U 1476 902.00
11 Park, Nathan Heartland Fencing Academy U 1481 773.26
12 Yu, Ryan Renaissance Fencing Club U 1157 654.56
13 D'Mello, Isaac Columbus International Fencing Academy U 1740 478.28
14 Chang, Joshua Fencing Institute Of Texas U 948 390.93
15 Ren, Michael Eminence Fencing Academy U 2016 308.45
16 Kline, Benjamin Columbus International Fencing Academy U 1293 198.25
17 Nepal, Chufue Twin Cities Fencing Club U 1616 177.63
18 Kosgi, Kartik U 1220 123.09
19 Zhang, Devon The Fencers Academy U 1258 108.30
20 Langdon, William Iowa City Fencing Center U 2500 < 0
21 Moll, Jack U 2500 < 0
22 Rieger, Julian South YEL Fencing Alliance U 2500 < 0
23 Vasylyshyn, Vadym Eminence Fencing Academy U 2079 < 0
24 DeBoth, Landon South YEL Fencing Alliance U 2079 < 0
25 Antipov, Maxim Eminence Fencing Academy U 1712 < 0
26 An, Graham Eminence Fencing Academy U 1060 < 0
27 Harris, Locke Plymouth/Ann Arbor Fencing Academy U 714 < 0
28 An, Jacob Eminence Fencing Academy U 900 < 0

1 Rank is not based on the typical strength estimate, but on the smaller conservative estimate.

2 Since strength estimates have varying degrees of uncertainty, we're showing the number that we're almost 100% sure about. Fencers with a higher estimate of a lower certainty will rank below some fencers with a lower estimate of a higher certainty. For those statistically inclined, it is the lower boundary of a 99.7% confidence interval of the estimate (i.e., μ - 3σ).

Note: At this time, fencers who have no competition history may be registered, but aren't included on this list. This will change soon!