Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | JUDD Mehta J. | - | - | - | 4% | 22% | 57% | 17% |
| 2 | LI Arvin | - | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 26% | 6% |
| 3 | MCLEAN Miles K. | - | - | 1% | 11% | 40% | 48% | |
| 3 | DAVIDSON Elliot | - | - | 1% | 11% | 41% | 47% | |
| 5 | LEE Brendan | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 58% | |
| 6 | XU Andy P. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 6% |
| 7 | MILLER Aidan A. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 48% | 33% | |
| 8 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 42% | 13% | |
| 9 | POPESCU Tudor | - | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 11% |
| 10 | CHESSA Giovanni | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 39% | 15% | |
| 11 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 23% | |
| 12 | LIU Derek | - | - | 3% | 18% | 47% | 32% | |
| 13 | CHENG Ethan | - | - | 7% | 33% | 45% | 15% | |
| 14 | XU Ethan | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 33% | 7% | |
| 15 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 3% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 9% | 1% | |
| 16 | LAO Kevin | 5% | 47% | 35% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
| 17 | KHANDELWAL Jay | - | - | - | - | 2% | 30% | 68% |
| 18 | AMRANI David | - | 2% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 19 | KLYCZEK Andrew | - | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% |
| 20 | GARDINER Luke J. | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 21 | LACHAPELLE Cole | 1% | 10% | 30% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 22 | LI Aaron | - | - | 5% | 23% | 45% | 27% | |
| 23 | LIGH Thomas | - | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 33% | 9% |
| 24 | DENG Kenny | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 25 | LU Howen | - | 1% | 8% | 24% | 36% | 25% | 6% |
| 26 | LOZADA Gabriel G. | 1% | 11% | 33% | 36% | 16% | 3% | |
| 27 | YU Stephen | 2% | 11% | 30% | 36% | 19% | 2% | |
| 28 | SURESH Rohan | 7% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 6% | - | |
| 29 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | 4% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 6% | - | |
| 30 | YANG Dylan | 34% | 46% | 17% | 2% | - | - | |
| 31 | WERWA Griffith | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 20% | 4% |
| 32 | TANG xianchi | 9% | 33% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 33 | GALLER Dave | 1% | 10% | 34% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 34 | VO Jonathan | 4% | 20% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 35 | SATTAR Dylan | 8% | 35% | 42% | 13% | 1% | - | |
| 36 | CHUA Kirby | 2% | 17% | 42% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 37 | CHENG Austyn | 27% | 47% | 22% | 4% | - | - | |
| 38 | WILBERT Matt | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 37% | 14% | |
| 39 | CROWDER Andrew E. | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% |
| 40 | CANEDO James | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | HO Jor Sam | 6% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 42 | BISHOP Henry | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - | |
| 43 | GE Daniel | 10% | 41% | 35% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 44 | FENG Michael | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 45 | RIPA Joseph K. | 31% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 46 | WANG Rory | 6% | 28% | 39% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 47 | SOLOPOULOS James | 16% | 45% | 33% | 6% | - | - | |
| 48 | HARRIS Noah | 1% | 9% | 35% | 41% | 13% | 1% | |
| 49 | MASTRONARDI Joseph M. | 12% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 50 | ABANILLA Luke | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 51 | RUPP Keegan E. | - | 8% | 33% | 40% | 16% | 2% | - |
| 52 | TAM Kyle | 41% | 44% | 14% | 1% | - | - | |
| 53 | EBERMAN Henry | 8% | 29% | 37% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 54 | PILIPSKI Aiden | 64% | 31% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | DANGELO Connor | 80% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 55 | BROGAN Kevin | 21% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 57 | LI Kevin | 61% | 33% | 5% | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.