Boston Fencing Club - Boston, MA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | JUDD Mehta J. | D V V V V V | V V V V V V | 4.9 | 5 | +0.1 |
| 2 | LI Arvin | V V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.0 | 6 | +2.0 |
| 3 | MCLEAN Miles K. | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | DAVIDSON Elliot | V V V V V | V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 5 | LEE Brendan | V V V V V | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 6 | XU Andy P. | D V V V V V | V V V D | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 7 | MILLER Aidan A. | D V V V V | V V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 8 | WOODTHORPE Michael G. | V V D V V | V V V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 9 | POPESCU Tudor | D V V V V V | V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 10 | CHESSA Giovanni | V V D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 4 | +0.5 |
| 11 | SYOMICHEV Gleb A. | V D V V V | V V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 12 | LIU Derek | V D V V V | V V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 13 | CHENG Ethan | V V V V D | V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 14 | XU Ethan | D V D V V | V V D | 3.3 | 3 | -0.3 |
| 15 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | D V V D D | V V D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 16 | LAO Kevin | V D D D V D | V V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 17 | KHANDELWAL Jay | V V V V V V | D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 18 | AMRANI David | V V V V V | D | 3.3 | 5 | +1.7 |
| 19 | KLYCZEK Andrew | V V D V V V | V D | 4.8 | 5 | +0.2 |
| 20 | GARDINER Luke J. | V D V V V | V D | 2.4 | 4 | +1.6 |
| 21 | LACHAPELLE Cole | V V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 22 | LI Aaron | V V D V V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 23 | LIGH Thomas | V D V V V D | V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 24 | DENG Kenny | V D D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 4 | +1.4 |
| 25 | LU Howen | V D V V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 26 | LOZADA Gabriel G. | D D V V V | V D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 27 | YU Stephen | D V V D V | V D | 2.7 | 3 | +0.3 |
| 28 | SURESH Rohan | D V D V D | V D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 29 | DJONOUMA Toyohm | V D V D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 30 | YANG Dylan | D V D D V | V D | 0.9 | 2 | +1.1 |
| 31 | WERWA Griffith | D D D V D V | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 32 | TANG xianchi | D D D D V | V D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 33 | GALLER Dave | V V D D V V | D | 2.7 | 4 | +1.3 |
| 34 | VO Jonathan | V V V D D D | D | 2.2 | 3 | +0.8 |
| 35 | SATTAR Dylan | V D V D D | D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 36 | CHUA Kirby | V D D V D | D | 2.3 | 2 | -0.3 |
| 37 | CHENG Austyn | D V V D D | D | 1.0 | 2 | +1.0 |
| 38 | WILBERT Matt | D V V D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 39 | CROWDER Andrew E. | V V D D D D | D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 40 | CANEDO James | D V D V D D | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 41 | HO Jor Sam | D D V V D D | D | 1.9 | 2 | +0.1 |
| 42 | BISHOP Henry | D D V D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 43 | GE Daniel | V D D D D | D | 1.6 | 1 | -0.6 |
| 44 | FENG Michael | D V D D D | D | 1.1 | 1 | -0.1 |
| 45 | RIPA Joseph K. | D D D V D | D | 1.0 | 1 | - |
| 46 | WANG Rory | D D D V D | D | 1.9 | 1 | -0.9 |
| 47 | SOLOPOULOS James | D D D D V | D | 1.3 | 1 | -0.3 |
| 48 | HARRIS Noah | V D D D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 49 | MASTRONARDI Joseph M. | V D D D D | D | 1.7 | 1 | -0.7 |
| 50 | ABANILLA Luke | D D D D D V | D | 2.2 | 1 | -1.2 |
| 51 | RUPP Keegan E. | V D D D D D | D | 2.7 | 1 | -1.7 |
| 52 | TAM Kyle | D D D D D | D | 0.8 | 0 | -0.8 |
| 53 | EBERMAN Henry | D D D D D | D | 1.9 | 0 | -1.9 |
| 54 | PILIPSKI Aiden | D D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 55 | DANGELO Connor | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 55 | BROGAN Kevin | D D D D D D | D | 1.3 | 0 | -1.3 |
| 57 | LI Kevin | D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.