Suffern, NY - Suffern, NY, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | POSSICK Lola P. | - | - | - | - | 5% | 32% | 62% |
2 | EDGINGTON Grace | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 44% | 10% |
3 | TURNOF Kayla M. | - | 5% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
3 | PRIEUR Lauren | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 2% |
5 | SATHYANATH Kailing | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% | |
6 | CHIOLDI Mina | - | - | 2% | 10% | 30% | 40% | 18% |
7 | KOO Samantha | - | 1% | 5% | 19% | 35% | 31% | 10% |
8 | SHOMAN Miriam | - | - | 2% | 10% | 28% | 40% | 20% |
9 | KALINICHENKO Alexandra (Sasha) | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 2% |
10 | YURT Leyla | - | - | 6% | 24% | 41% | 24% | 4% |
11 | FERRARI-BRIDGERS Marinella O. | - | 5% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 7% | |
12 | SHOMAN Jenna | - | - | - | - | 5% | 30% | 64% |
13 | OXENSTIERNA Carolina | 1% | 7% | 24% | 35% | 24% | 8% | 1% |
14 | LU Yi Lin | 8% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
15 | SINHA Anika | - | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 34% | 13% |
16 | YUAN Greta | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
18 | LOCKETT Audrey | 4% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 10% | 2% | - |
19 | PARRIS Gillian A. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 36% | 15% | |
20 | ALCEBAR Kayla | - | - | 1% | 6% | 26% | 44% | 24% |
21 | MEIEROVICH Sophie | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 32% | 17% | 4% |
22 | SU Emma | 4% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - |
23 | BAKER Audrey C. | - | 3% | 17% | 40% | 32% | 7% | |
24 | WANG Jianning | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | |
25 | LEVITIS Danielle | - | 2% | 16% | 39% | 34% | 8% | |
26 | JAVERI Amaya | 1% | 6% | 25% | 39% | 23% | 6% | - |
27 | ZHANG Judy | 1% | 8% | 25% | 34% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
28 | NIELSEN Dianna M. | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
29 | CHIANG Emily | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - |
30 | ROCCA Mary J. | 2% | 13% | 34% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
31 | HAN Lauren | 6% | 27% | 36% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
32 | SHAY-TANNAS Zoe | - | 3% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 11% | |
33 | GRINBERG Aliya | 2% | 14% | 33% | 33% | 15% | 2% | |
34 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | 3% | 19% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | |
35 | WHEELER Kira | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | |
36 | CHO Adella | 5% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - |
37 | HUANG Sharon | 1% | 12% | 30% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - |
38 | NGUYEN Ella | 9% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
39 | LIGH Karis | 25% | 43% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
40 | CHAGARES Sarah M. | 34% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
41 | MEDVEDEVA Alexandra | 21% | 43% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
42 | SHIH Christina | 1% | 9% | 27% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - |
43 | ZHIZHIN Jeanette | 39% | 41% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
44 | BHOGAL Sukhleen | 25% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | - | - |
45 | PANCHAL Stuti | 16% | 55% | 25% | 3% | - | - | |
46 | CHIANG Sydney | 21% | 45% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.