Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | TORRES Jimena | - | - | - | 1% | 16% | 83% | |
| 2 | LIU Joy Zhaoyi | - | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% |
| 3 | GOMES Rafaella T. | - | - | 1% | 8% | 32% | 43% | 16% |
| 3 | CHEW Alexis T. | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
| 5 | KIM Katherine | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 43% | 48% |
| 6 | SUN Ruoxi | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
| 7 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 17% | |
| 8 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% |
| 9 | DUAN Konnie | - | - | 1% | 12% | 36% | 38% | 13% |
| 10 | KOROL Neta | - | - | - | 2% | 16% | 44% | 38% |
| 11 | PENG Amber L. | - | - | 4% | 21% | 42% | 27% | 5% |
| 12 | LOCKE Savannah | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 32% | |
| 13 | YU Seneca | - | - | - | 2% | 18% | 52% | 27% |
| 14 | LEE Ji Ahn | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 2% | |
| 15 | LUO Ziwen | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 39% | 19% | |
| 16 | FUNG Vera | 2% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | 1% | |
| 17 | DE LA CRUZ Alyssa | - | - | 1% | 9% | 33% | 42% | 15% |
| 18 | CHEN Chloe I. | 1% | 9% | 29% | 40% | 21% | 1% | |
| 19 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | - | 3% | 21% | 42% | 28% | 5% |
| 20 | KO Claire | - | 6% | 38% | 39% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 21 | GUAN Sophie | 6% | 27% | 40% | 22% | 5% | - | |
| 22 | FUNG Emma | - | 1% | 10% | 35% | 37% | 15% | 2% |
| 23 | MORADI Raiyan N. | - | 3% | 17% | 38% | 34% | 8% | 1% |
| 24 | LEE Allison | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 25 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 2% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 12% | 1% | |
| 26 | CHANG Elizabeth | 3% | 25% | 40% | 25% | 6% | 1% | |
| 27 | SUN Emily | 11% | 35% | 36% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 28 | GUAN Sydney | 1% | 21% | 48% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
| 29 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 1% | 7% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 5% | |
| 30 | SUN Chien-Yu | 2% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | |
| 31 | SHUM Elizabeth | 9% | 32% | 38% | 18% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | FERNANDES Thea | 1% | 8% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | |
| 33 | LUONG Joanne K. | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 22% | |
| 34 | KOROL Dana | - | - | 4% | 22% | 41% | 27% | 6% |
| 35 | DO Leila | 1% | 8% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 3% | - |
| 36 | WANG Brina | 10% | 34% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 37 | YANICELLI Sloane | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 38 | HOBSON Ava | - | 2% | 21% | 44% | 27% | 6% | - |
| 39 | BOLES Amanda X. | 9% | 33% | 39% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 40 | WANG Celine S. | 12% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 41 | MORALES Paulina | 7% | 49% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 42 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | - | |
| 42 | LUH Mia P. | 32% | 43% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 44 | PATTERSON Natalia | 35% | 43% | 18% | 4% | - | - | |
| 45 | CHOI Kailyn | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 46 | CABALU Alaina | 60% | 33% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 47 | SHUM Maya | 12% | 37% | 36% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 48 | HASAN Fatema | 49% | 46% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 49 | ZHENG Zoe | 22% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | EGENOLF Gabriella | 37% | 53% | 9% | - | - | - | - |
| 51 | QUINN Anna | 32% | 44% | 20% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 52 | LIU Jessica | 78% | 20% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.