Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HWANG Gabriela M. | - | - | 5% | 21% | 43% | 31% | |
| 2 | CHIN Sophia J. | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% | |
| 3 | TUNG Renee | 9% | 30% | 35% | 20% | 5% | 1% | |
| 3 | HUAI Delilah | - | 5% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 6% | |
| 5 | MOZHAEVA Maria | - | - | - | 5% | 29% | 66% | |
| 6 | NGUYEN Siena | 2% | 12% | 30% | 35% | 18% | 3% | |
| 7 | YANG Lea | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
| 8 | HUANG Madeline | - | 4% | 26% | 43% | 23% | 3% | |
| 9 | LIN Audrey J. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
| 10 | STONE Coral | 12% | 35% | 35% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 11 | ERIKSON Kira R. | - | 1% | 9% | 27% | 40% | 23% | |
| 12 | YAO Rainie | 1% | 8% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
| 13 | HOLMES Emma | - | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 33% | 8% |
| 14 | CHIN Elise | - | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 30% | 4% |
| 15 | ARNOLD Hali | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 16 | CHAVEZ Frine | - | 6% | 31% | 41% | 19% | 3% | |
| 17 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | - | - | - | 1% | 11% | 39% | 48% |
| 18 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 23% | 5% | |
| 19 | TONG Jessie | - | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 7% | |
| 20 | KIM Elyssa | 30% | 52% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 21 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | 1% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 2% | |
| 22 | WANG Peijia | 9% | 32% | 37% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
| 23 | LIN Nicole | - | 4% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
| 24 | LEE Lauren | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 25 | DIECK Miranda P. | - | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 6% | - |
| 26 | CHO Michelle | - | 4% | 19% | 37% | 31% | 9% | - |
| 27 | HITOMI Nadya | 4% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
| 28 | HU Michelle | - | 1% | 14% | 39% | 37% | 9% | |
| 29 | WIGGINS Yaanathia | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% | |
| 30 | MENDIOLA RITCHIE Ingrid | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 41% | 22% | |
| 31 | BOLTON Eleksi M. | 15% | 36% | 32% | 14% | 3% | - | |
| 32 | LIU Sydney | 2% | 16% | 37% | 32% | 12% | 1% | |
| 33 | FREY Sarah E. | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 34 | WANG Zidan | 2% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 2% | |
| 35 | FENG Alicia G. | 6% | 24% | 38% | 25% | 7% | - | |
| 36 | CHEN Elaine | 21% | 45% | 27% | 7% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | PYO Penelope E. | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 38 | LIU Hannah | 36% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 39 | DANG Kelia | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | |
| 40 | SAAD Alia | 46% | 44% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 41 | BAVIPATI Smira | 36% | 44% | 17% | 3% | - | - | |
| 41 | YANG Jiaqi Kiki | 63% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - | |
| 43 | GOURNEAU Sophie L. | 20% | 46% | 27% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 44 | HUSS Miriam | 32% | 42% | 21% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.