Liontree Arena (RIMAC) @ UC San Diego - La Jolla, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | HWANG Gabriela M. | V V V V V | V V V V V | 4.0 | 5 | +1.0 |
| 2 | CHIN Sophia J. | V V V V V | V V V V D | 4.3 | 5 | +0.7 |
| 3 | TUNG Renee | D V V D D | V V V V D | 1.8 | 2 | +0.2 |
| 3 | HUAI Delilah | V V D D V | V V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 5 | MOZHAEVA Maria | V V V V V | V V D | 4.6 | 5 | +0.4 |
| 6 | NGUYEN Siena | V V V V V | V V D | 2.7 | 5 | +2.3 |
| 7 | YANG Lea | V V V V V | V V D | 3.2 | 5 | +1.8 |
| 8 | HUANG Madeline | V D V D V | V V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 9 | LIN Audrey J. | V V V V V V | V D | 5.7 | 6 | +0.3 |
| 10 | STONE Coral | V V D V V | V D | 1.6 | 4 | +2.4 |
| 11 | ERIKSON Kira R. | D V V V V | V D | 3.8 | 4 | +0.2 |
| 12 | YAO Rainie | D D V V V V | V D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 13 | HOLMES Emma | D V D V V V | V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 14 | CHIN Elise | V V D V D V | V D | 4.1 | 4 | -0.1 |
| 15 | ARNOLD Hali | V D D V D | V V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 16 | CHAVEZ Frine | D D D V V | V V D | 2.8 | 2 | -0.8 |
| 17 | CALLAHAN Chase J. | V V V V V V | D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 18 | ALFARACHE Gabriella C. | V D V V V | D | 2.9 | 4 | +1.1 |
| 19 | TONG Jessie | V V D V V | D | 3.1 | 4 | +0.9 |
| 20 | KIM Elyssa | V V D V D | D | 0.9 | 3 | +2.1 |
| 21 | RAMIREZ Mirka A. | V V V D D | D | 2.6 | 3 | +0.4 |
| 22 | WANG Peijia | V D V D V D | D | 1.8 | 3 | +1.2 |
| 23 | LIN Nicole | V V V D D D | D | 3.4 | 3 | -0.4 |
| 24 | LEE Lauren | D D V V D V | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 25 | DIECK Miranda P. | V D D V D V | V D | 3.0 | 3 | - |
| 26 | CHO Michelle | D V V D V D | V D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 27 | HITOMI Nadya | V D D D V | V D | 2.0 | 2 | - |
| 28 | HU Michelle | D V V D D | V D | 3.4 | 2 | -1.4 |
| 29 | WIGGINS Yaanathia | D D V V D | V D | 3.0 | 2 | -1.0 |
| 30 | MENDIOLA RITCHIE Ingrid | D V V D D | V D | 3.8 | 2 | -1.8 |
| 31 | BOLTON Eleksi M. | V D D D V | V D | 1.6 | 2 | +0.4 |
| 32 | LIU Sydney | D V V D D | V D | 2.4 | 2 | -0.4 |
| 33 | FREY Sarah E. | D V D D D V | D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 34 | WANG Zidan | D D V D D | D | 2.6 | 1 | -1.6 |
| 35 | FENG Alicia G. | D D D D V | D | 2.0 | 1 | -1.0 |
| 36 | CHEN Elaine | D D D V D | D | 1.2 | 1 | -0.2 |
| 37 | PYO Penelope E. | D D D V D | D | 1.5 | 1 | -0.5 |
| 38 | LIU Hannah | D V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 39 | DANG Kelia | D D D D D | D | 2.6 | 0 | -2.6 |
| 40 | SAAD Alia | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 41 | BAVIPATI Smira | D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
| 41 | YANG Jiaqi Kiki | D D D D D | D | 0.4 | 0 | -0.4 |
| 43 | GOURNEAU Sophie L. | D D D D D D | D | 1.2 | 0 | -1.2 |
| 44 | HUSS Miriam | D D D D D D | D | 1.0 | 0 | -1.0 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.