Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | SAIFEE Lamya | - | - | - | 3% | 14% | 39% | 44% |
2 | HO Addison | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 40% | 45% |
3 | HSU Kaylin | - | - | - | - | 2% | 21% | 77% |
3 | SWANSON Alexa | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 34% | 57% |
5 | BROWN Lola | - | - | - | 1% | 10% | 39% | 50% |
6 | BEAVER Ava | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 32% | 61% |
7 | REN Kayley | - | - | - | - | 2% | 23% | 75% |
8 | DUAN Sophie | - | - | - | 2% | 13% | 41% | 44% |
9 | DENG Melissa | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 23% | |
10 | ZHANG Soleil C. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 35% | 58% |
11 | GUO Audrey | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 1% |
12 | ZHANG Gwenyth | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 39% | 22% | 3% |
13 | LEVESQUE Brielle | - | 1% | 6% | 22% | 38% | 28% | 6% |
14 | TAO Ann | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 41% | 15% | 1% |
14 | KIM Sydney | - | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 4% |
16 | ZOU Ella | - | - | 1% | 6% | 29% | 49% | 15% |
17 | ZHANG Ivy | - | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 45% | 15% |
18 | HAN Gian | - | 5% | 26% | 44% | 22% | 3% | |
19 | KRYLTSOVA Eva | - | 4% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 2% |
20 | POEI Lauren | - | 3% | 13% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 2% |
21 | DESERANNO Seren | - | - | 3% | 16% | 38% | 35% | 8% |
22 | MA Isabelle | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
23 | YONG Rosalind | - | 4% | 17% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
24 | MIYASHIRO Katelyn | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 13% | 2% |
25 | CHOI Sophie | 2% | 15% | 37% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - |
26 | BAE Yooju | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 36% | 18% | 2% |
27 | CHAN Mila | - | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 42% | 6% |
28 | SOE Hayleigh | 7% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
29 | LI Joy | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 11% | 1% |
30 | YAO Abby | - | 1% | 7% | 27% | 43% | 21% | |
31 | LI Alice | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | - |
32 | ZEE Savannah | 7% | 33% | 38% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
33 | LIU Ariana | 1% | 7% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 6% | - |
34 | LIN Allison | 16% | 38% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
35 | TULYAG Sayda | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
36 | DENG Claire | 1% | 8% | 25% | 35% | 23% | 6% | - |
37 | PARK Lauren | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
38 | FUNG Sarafina | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
39 | HOM Avery | 10% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
40 | CHO Karis | 4% | 21% | 37% | 27% | 9% | 1% | - |
41 | ZHANG Viviana | 2% | 19% | 41% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
42 | LUCAS Ava | 20% | 40% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
43 | TAN Shouyin | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 1% |
44 | WU Elynna | - | 2% | 12% | 33% | 37% | 15% | 1% |
45 | NAYGAS Alexandra | 2% | 13% | 32% | 34% | 16% | 2% | - |
46 | LU Keeva | 6% | 24% | 37% | 25% | 8% | 1% | - |
47 | HAN Mia | - | 3% | 17% | 35% | 32% | 12% | 1% |
48 | WU Chingfei Amber | 4% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 10% | 1% | - |
49 | LIU Angelina | 10% | 31% | 35% | 19% | 5% | - | - |
50 | WU Allison | - | 2% | 14% | 34% | 35% | 13% | 1% |
51 | KIM Natalie | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 13% | 2% |
52 | HUGHES Olivia | 16% | 39% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
53 | ZHOU Joi | 8% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
54 | SAH Madeleine | 61% | 32% | 6% | 1% | - | - | |
55 | LEE Zoe | 5% | 34% | 40% | 18% | 3% | - | |
56 | RUI Jessie | 4% | 20% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
57 | CHANG Lydia | 1% | 13% | 33% | 34% | 15% | 3% | - |
58 | MA Yifei | 7% | 28% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
59 | HOM Emma | 59% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
60 | YU Sophie | 15% | 36% | 32% | 13% | 3% | - | - |
61 | SAIFEE Zahra | 1% | 9% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | - |
62 | MCLANAHAN Jasmine | 6% | 23% | 35% | 25% | 9% | 2% | - |
63 | LIM Kora | 20% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
64 | TAI Taphanie | 16% | 37% | 32% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
65 | CHEN Elysia | 40% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
66 | HSIAO Ariya | 32% | 46% | 19% | 3% | - | - | - |
67 | TAI Penelope | 25% | 42% | 25% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
67 | LIM Kensie | 6% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
67 | THANT Alexis | 23% | 41% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.