Durham, NC - Durham, NC, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | WU Erica L. | - | 3% | 20% | 42% | 30% | 5% |
| 2 | SHEALY Maggie | - | - | 1% | 13% | 43% | 43% |
| 3 | ALLUM Isabel (Izzy) T. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 34% |
| 3 | TUCKER Iman R. | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 28% | 8% |
| 5 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | - | 1% | 6% | 24% | 42% | 27% |
| 6 | TANG Annie L. | - | 1% | 8% | 33% | 42% | 16% |
| 7 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 40% | 19% |
| 8 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | 1% | 9% | 28% | 37% | 21% | 4% |
| 9 | CHEN Xinyan | - | 5% | 25% | 42% | 23% | 4% |
| 10 | BENTOLILA Yedida | 2% | 32% | 44% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 11 | DODRILL Brooke | - | 1% | 10% | 33% | 42% | 14% |
| 12 | CHANG Emily | 1% | 7% | 26% | 39% | 23% | 5% |
| 13 | OLSEN Natalie J. | - | - | 6% | 30% | 44% | 19% |
| 14 | NI Sharon | 3% | 20% | 40% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 15 | LU Amy | 2% | 17% | 42% | 31% | 8% | - |
| 16 | DHAR Aamina | 22% | 42% | 28% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 17 | SCHIKORE Anna M. | 12% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - |
| 18 | MEYTIN Sophia E. | 32% | 45% | 19% | 3% | - | - |
| 19 | BENTOLILA Thalia | 25% | 48% | 23% | 4% | - | - |
| 20 | STEVENS Katherine | 7% | 34% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 21 | MICHAELS Philippa | 2% | 14% | 33% | 34% | 14% | 2% |
| 22 | CONGIUSTA Aelex | 28% | 49% | 20% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | ELDER Rhiannon C. | 65% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 24 | OWENS Sarabi | 20% | 41% | 29% | 9% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.