Durham, NC - Durham, NC, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 1 | WU Erica L. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 77% | 35% | 5% |
| 2 | SHEALY Maggie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 43% |
| 3 | ALLUM Isabel (Izzy) T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 34% |
| 3 | TUCKER Iman R. | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 8% |
| 5 | GREENBAUM Ella K. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 27% |
| 6 | TANG Annie L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 59% | 16% |
| 7 | NAZLYMOV Tatiana F. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 19% |
| 8 | BHATTACHARJEE Rhea | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 25% | 4% |
| 9 | CHEN Xinyan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 70% | 27% | 4% |
| 10 | BENTOLILA Yedida | 100% | 98% | 66% | 22% | 3% | - |
| 11 | DODRILL Brooke | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 14% |
| 12 | CHANG Emily | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 28% | 5% |
| 13 | OLSEN Natalie J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 64% | 19% |
| 14 | NI Sharon | 100% | 97% | 77% | 37% | 9% | 1% |
| 15 | LU Amy | 100% | 98% | 81% | 39% | 8% | - |
| 16 | DHAR Aamina | 100% | 78% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 17 | SCHIKORE Anna M. | 100% | 88% | 54% | 20% | 4% | - |
| 18 | MEYTIN Sophia E. | 100% | 68% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 19 | BENTOLILA Thalia | 100% | 75% | 27% | 4% | - | - |
| 20 | STEVENS Katherine | 100% | 93% | 59% | 17% | 2% | - |
| 21 | MICHAELS Philippa | 100% | 98% | 83% | 50% | 16% | 2% |
| 22 | CONGIUSTA Aelex | 100% | 72% | 23% | 3% | - | - |
| 23 | ELDER Rhiannon C. | 100% | 35% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 24 | OWENS Sarabi | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.