Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | - | - | 3% | 15% | 37% | 38% | 8% |
2 | SUN Ruoxi | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 35% | |
3 | RANDOLPH Piper | - | - | 1% | 7% | 24% | 41% | 28% |
3 | WANDJI Anais | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
5 | LI Phoebe J. | - | - | - | - | 6% | 33% | 60% |
6 | CHEN Chloe I. | - | - | 6% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 5% |
7 | MANIKTALA Prisha | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 40% | 20% | 2% |
8 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | - | - | - | < 1% | 5% | 29% | 66% |
9 | FUNG Emma | - | - | 7% | 28% | 41% | 22% | 3% |
10 | FUNG Vera | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
11 | HAN Ashley | 4% | 19% | 35% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - |
12 | KOROL Neta | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 51% | |
13 | GOOR Viviene E. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 31% | 40% | 18% |
14 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 6% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
15 | DO Leila | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | 1% |
16 | ZHANG Eunice | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
17 | LUO Sandra J. | - | 2% | 11% | 33% | 40% | 14% | |
18 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 28% | 67% |
19 | CASTANEDA Keira | - | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 5% | - |
20 | MING YUE | - | 1% | 8% | 31% | 40% | 19% | 2% |
21 | RAO Sonia D. | 4% | 26% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | |
22 | KHOO Lauren A. | - | - | - | 4% | 21% | 45% | 29% |
23 | KOROL Dana | - | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 24% | 6% |
24 | LEE Ji Ahn | - | 4% | 23% | 43% | 26% | 4% | |
25 | PANT Anisha | - | 4% | 18% | 37% | 32% | 10% | |
26 | WELBORN Calissa | 10% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 4% | - | |
27 | LI Shuang | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 38% | 21% | 2% |
28 | PATTERSON Natalia | 24% | 40% | 26% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
29 | LAI Sophia | 1% | 18% | 38% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
30 | SHIH Diane | - | 3% | 15% | 34% | 35% | 13% | |
31 | HSIUNG Samantha | - | 5% | 25% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% |
32 | TROXEL Sylvie A. | 1% | 7% | 27% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
33 | WANG Celine S. | 10% | 39% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
34 | BEAVER Hannah | 1% | 12% | 40% | 35% | 11% | 1% | |
35 | GRANHOLM Carolyn N. | - | 2% | 13% | 33% | 37% | 15% | |
36 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | - | 2% | 13% | 38% | 38% | 9% | |
37 | SUN Emily | 4% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 6% | - | |
38 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 3% | 18% | 37% | 30% | 10% | 1% | - |
39 | HAN Crystal | - | 2% | 13% | 34% | 36% | 14% | 1% |
40 | HOBSON Ava | 1% | 8% | 26% | 38% | 22% | 5% | - |
41 | MORADI Raiyan N. | - | 3% | 16% | 35% | 33% | 13% | 1% |
42 | QUINN Anna | 5% | 45% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
43 | OH Ceana | 2% | 15% | 42% | 31% | 9% | 1% | - |
44 | NICKOLOV Nora | 19% | 50% | 26% | 5% | - | - | |
45 | BOLES Amanda X. | 1% | 17% | 38% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - |
46 | FERNANDES Thea | - | 3% | 14% | 30% | 33% | 17% | 3% |
47 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 29% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
48 | YAN Noelle | 28% | 43% | 23% | 6% | 1% | - | |
49 | SUN Chien-Yu | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 2% | |
50 | TURNER Stephanie E. | - | 7% | 30% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - |
51 | TUAN Sophie | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | - |
52 | SEAL Julie T. | - | < 1% | 1% | 5% | 24% | 45% | 25% |
53 | NIRGUDE Esha | 18% | 53% | 25% | 4% | - | - | - |
54 | GOEL Riyana | 81% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
55 | JEON Emily H. | 53% | 39% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
56 | ZHENG Zoe | 50% | 38% | 11% | 1% | - | - | |
57 | BAIXAULI Carme | 4% | 20% | 34% | 28% | 11% | 2% | - |
58 | DOBRINEN Elizabeth | 17% | 41% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
59 | LIU Jessica | 84% | 15% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
60 | SANDVIK Clarissa A. | 55% | 38% | 7% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.