Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | DAVIS Bonnie Z. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 45% | 8% |
2 | SUN Ruoxi | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 35% | |
3 | RANDOLPH Piper | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 28% |
3 | WANDJI Anais | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 63% | 21% |
5 | LI Phoebe J. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% |
6 | CHEN Chloe I. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% |
7 | MANIKTALA Prisha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 22% | 2% |
8 | CASTANEDA Erika L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 66% |
9 | FUNG Emma | 100% | 100% | 100% | 93% | 65% | 24% | 3% |
10 | FUNG Vera | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | 1% |
11 | HAN Ashley | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% | - |
12 | KOROL Neta | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 51% | |
13 | GOOR Viviene E. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 58% | 18% |
14 | LIPKOVITZ Rivka | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
15 | DO Leila | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% | 1% |
16 | ZHANG Eunice | 100% | 99% | 88% | 61% | 28% | 7% | 1% |
17 | LUO Sandra J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 54% | 14% | |
18 | GEBALA Gabrielle Grace A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 67% |
19 | CASTANEDA Keira | 100% | 100% | 93% | 67% | 29% | 6% | - |
20 | MING YUE | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 20% | 2% |
21 | RAO Sonia D. | 100% | 96% | 70% | 30% | 6% | - | |
22 | KHOO Lauren A. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 29% |
23 | KOROL Dana | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
24 | LEE Ji Ahn | 100% | 100% | 96% | 73% | 30% | 4% | |
25 | PANT Anisha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 42% | 10% | |
26 | WELBORN Calissa | 100% | 90% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
27 | LI Shuang | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 62% | 24% | 2% |
28 | PATTERSON Natalia | 100% | 76% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
29 | LAI Sophia | 100% | 99% | 81% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
30 | SHIH Diane | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
31 | HSIUNG Samantha | 100% | 100% | 95% | 71% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
32 | TROXEL Sylvie A. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
33 | WANG Celine S. | 100% | 90% | 51% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
34 | BEAVER Hannah | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% | 12% | 1% | |
35 | GRANHOLM Carolyn N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | |
36 | TALWALKAR Apoorva | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 47% | 9% | |
37 | SUN Emily | 100% | 96% | 71% | 31% | 6% | - | |
38 | HAFEZ Tahiyah | 100% | 97% | 79% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
39 | HAN Crystal | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 15% | 1% |
40 | HOBSON Ava | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 5% | - |
41 | MORADI Raiyan N. | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 1% |
42 | QUINN Anna | 100% | 95% | 51% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
43 | OH Ceana | 100% | 98% | 83% | 41% | 10% | 1% | - |
44 | NICKOLOV Nora | 100% | 81% | 31% | 5% | - | - | |
45 | BOLES Amanda X. | 100% | 99% | 82% | 44% | 12% | 2% | - |
46 | FERNANDES Thea | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
47 | ZAMELIS Madelyn | 100% | 71% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
48 | YAN Noelle | 100% | 72% | 30% | 6% | 1% | - | |
49 | SUN Chien-Yu | 100% | 99% | 89% | 57% | 19% | 2% | |
50 | TURNER Stephanie E. | 100% | 100% | 92% | 62% | 24% | 5% | - |
51 | TUAN Sophie | 100% | 49% | 11% | 1% | - | - | - |
52 | SEAL Julie T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 70% | 25% |
53 | NIRGUDE Esha | 100% | 82% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - |
54 | GOEL Riyana | 100% | 19% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
55 | JEON Emily H. | 100% | 47% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
56 | ZHENG Zoe | 100% | 50% | 12% | 1% | - | - | |
57 | BAIXAULI Carme | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | - |
58 | DOBRINEN Elizabeth | 100% | 83% | 42% | 11% | 1% | - | - |
59 | LIU Jessica | 100% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
60 | SANDVIK Clarissa A. | 100% | 45% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.