Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | HWANG Hagan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 30% |
| 2 | KANG Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 64% | 23% |
| 3 | YU BOWEN | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 36% |
| 3 | BAERENWALD Tybalt Wolfram | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 49% | 12% | |
| 5 | GU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 45% |
| 6 | TANG Morgan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 34% | |
| 7 | HRISTOV Nickolas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 27% |
| 8 | YUEN Caleb | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 27% | 4% | |
| 9 | HAO Johnny | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 62% | 29% | 6% |
| 10 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 64% | 28% | 5% |
| 11 | LIU Nico | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 25% | 4% |
| 12 | ESCOBEDO Maxwell | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 12% |
| 13 | RAMBHIA Smit | 100% | 98% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 14 | YU Ian | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 31% | |
| 15 | CHEN Brian | 100% | 98% | 80% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 16 | FU BRANDEN | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 44% | 13% | 1% |
| 17 | WONG Hawken | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 54% | 19% | 3% |
| 18 | PARK Emerson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 44% | 12% | 1% |
| 19 | GRIGORIEV Roman | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 51% | 20% | 3% |
| 20 | KIM Eric | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 41% | 12% | 1% |
| 21 | YUE Ivan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 22 | HO Alden | 100% | 100% | 92% | 68% | 34% | 9% | 1% |
| 23 | GUO Jonathan | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 24 | QI Jeremy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 25 | HAN Kyle | 100% | 100% | 92% | 64% | 26% | 4% | |
| 26 | CHEN Aaron | 100% | 98% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
| 27 | WANG David | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 36% | 10% | 1% |
| 28 | GUO ATTICUS | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 29 | CHOW Tyson J. | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 28% | 8% | 1% |
| 30 | QI Zach | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 37% | 6% |
| 31 | YUAN Alan | 100% | 98% | 81% | 45% | 14% | 2% | |
| 32 | CHIANG Tyson | 100% | 97% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 33 | GUO Youwei | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 73% | 38% | 9% |
| 34 | VENKATRAMAN Sushil | 100% | 88% | 55% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 35 | WU Dawei | 100% | 95% | 73% | 39% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 36 | LUC Cedric | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 37 | LIU Baichen | 100% | 96% | 78% | 46% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 38 | DENG Richard | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 23% | 5% | 1% |
| 39 | TABANCAY Cole | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 30% | 5% |
| 40 | HU Xiaoxin | 100% | 96% | 75% | 37% | 9% | 1% | |
| 41 | LO Lei | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
| 42 | HUGHES-WILLIAMS Atticus A | 100% | 89% | 58% | 24% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 43 | YANG Aegon | 100% | 94% | 71% | 36% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 44 | GONG Yubo (Justin) | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
| 45 | LI Jason | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 69% | 35% | 8% |
| 46 | LEE Jayden | 100% | 97% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 47 | BELHE Hridhaan | 100% | 73% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 48 | DING Orlando | 100% | 98% | 82% | 47% | 14% | 2% | |
| 49 | DU Owen | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 35% | 10% | 1% |
| 50 | LEE Bill King | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 51 | RHEE Michael | 100% | 94% | 69% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | CHUNG Evan | 100% | 99% | 90% | 65% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
| 53 | JI Derek | 100% | 98% | 82% | 48% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 54 | DOLEV Jonathan | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 55 | LI Kevin | 100% | 90% | 58% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
| 56 | LAI Mars | 100% | 96% | 80% | 49% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 57 | RHEE Matthew | 100% | 54% | 14% | 2% | - | - | |
| 58 | YU Albert | 100% | 42% | 9% | 1% | - | - | |
| 59 | SEE Ryan | 100% | 95% | 73% | 37% | 11% | 1% | - |
| 60 | LEI Isaac | 100% | 42% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 61 | WANG James | 100% | 63% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.