Santa Clara Convention Center - Santa Clara, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | KO Brian J. | - | - | - | - | 2% | 19% | 79% |
2 | DIERKS Kian | - | - | - | 4% | 19% | 44% | 34% |
3 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | - | - | - | 1% | 8% | 35% | 57% |
3 | LEUNG Chu Ming Aiden | - | - | 5% | 21% | 39% | 29% | 5% |
5 | DESERANNO Jeidus | - | - | - | - | 3% | 23% | 74% |
6 | OTAKE Jared K. | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 38% | 52% |
7 | MA Andrew | - | - | 3% | 23% | 44% | 25% | 4% |
8 | HOBSON Aaron K. | - | - | 1% | 10% | 30% | 42% | 17% |
9 | CHENG Nathan | - | - | - | 5% | 26% | 47% | 23% |
10 | WANG Ethan | - | 3% | 15% | 32% | 33% | 15% | 2% |
11 | KIM Ryan Y. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 43% | 25% | |
12 | GOBBO Alexander | - | - | 3% | 14% | 35% | 38% | 10% |
13 | SUNG Chang-Han S. | - | - | - | 4% | 18% | 41% | 36% |
14 | YU Anders | - | - | 1% | 10% | 37% | 51% | |
15 | DESAI Nalin H. | - | - | - | 3% | 18% | 45% | 34% |
16 | MYERS Dean | - | 3% | 15% | 33% | 33% | 14% | 1% |
17 | KUZMAK Michael J. | - | 1% | 5% | 17% | 33% | 32% | 12% |
18 | DINSAY Kristjan A. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
19 | SEEDS Edward T. | 2% | 14% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 1% | |
20 | LI Jett | 1% | 6% | 21% | 33% | 27% | 10% | 2% |
21 | SETLUR Bhrugu | 3% | 16% | 33% | 32% | 14% | 2% | - |
22 | LIPPMAN Sam | - | 2% | 11% | 30% | 37% | 18% | 2% |
23 | LI Avery Peihong | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 37% | 17% | 1% |
24 | KHER Roan | - | 5% | 21% | 37% | 28% | 9% | 1% |
25 | LLIDO Soren | - | 5% | 22% | 37% | 27% | 8% | - |
26 | FINNEY Lorenz | 3% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
27 | CORTRIGHT Joshua C. | - | 1% | 12% | 42% | 35% | 9% | 1% |
28 | WALL Peter M. | 1% | 10% | 27% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
29 | EDISON Ansel | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
30 | MARTIN IV Elmer D. | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 41% | 19% | |
31 | RUBIN Max | 5% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
32 | CORTRIGHT Skipper | - | 5% | 19% | 35% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
33 | CRACRAFT John R. | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
34 | PARK Sky | 2% | 14% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
35 | LI Matthew | - | 4% | 17% | 34% | 31% | 13% | 2% |
36 | SHAGIDANYAN German | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 2% | |
37 | ZHENG zhe | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% |
38 | BAEK David | 1% | 9% | 29% | 37% | 20% | 4% | - |
39 | SEAL Maximus R. | - | 2% | 14% | 33% | 35% | 14% | 1% |
40 | HARRIS Otto | 4% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 8% | 1% | |
41 | LI Samuel | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
42 | OH Jaden | - | 6% | 23% | 39% | 26% | 5% | |
43 | WU Lucas | 5% | 25% | 38% | 24% | 6% | 1% | |
44 | GETSIN Anthony | 3% | 15% | 32% | 32% | 15% | 3% | - |
45 | WU Alistair | 1% | 7% | 21% | 33% | 26% | 10% | 2% |
46 | CLAYMAN John A. | - | 1% | 7% | 21% | 35% | 28% | 9% |
47 | MAK Osman K. | 37% | 43% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
48 | TKACHUK Daniel | 1% | 18% | 53% | 24% | 4% | - | - |
49 | CHAN Connor | 33% | 42% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
50 | SMITH Grant D. | 1% | 7% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - |
51 | FLANAGAN Miles | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
52 | KALAMAS Nikolas | 44% | 41% | 13% | 2% | - | - | - |
53 | GONZALEZ Matthew | 6% | 32% | 39% | 19% | 4% | - | |
54 | GREENEBAUM Oliver | 51% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
55 | GORDON William L. | 20% | 38% | 29% | 11% | 2% | - | - |
56 | LUTTON Thomas (Tom) W. | - | 4% | 19% | 34% | 29% | 11% | 2% |
57 | LAM Nicolas | 9% | 34% | 37% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
58 | RASMUSSEN Sage | 1% | 6% | 23% | 37% | 26% | 7% | 1% |
59 | BOUCHARD Kai | 10% | 31% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
60 | LEE Jayden | 7% | 32% | 38% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
61 | HSIAO Nicholas | 11% | 32% | 34% | 18% | 4% | - | - |
62 | PINCHENG Yao | 2% | 16% | 36% | 32% | 12% | 2% | - |
63 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | 6% | 27% | 37% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
64 | REICHEL Ezra | 16% | 42% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
65 | PETERSON Lucas | 15% | 59% | 24% | 2% | - | - | - |
66 | FLANAGAN James | 11% | 33% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - | - |
67 | PERALTA Christian | 63% | 31% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
68 | HOHN dana | 70% | 28% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.