Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DUCKETT Madison | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 84% | |
| 2 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 55% |
| 3 | ZHANG Sophie | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 9% |
| 3 | ATTIA Jasmine | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 17% | 2% | |
| 5 | FESTA Carina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 43% |
| 6 | MUND Ruth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 58% | 19% |
| 7 | KHAN Alissa | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 48% | 14% | |
| 8 | LIU Yifei | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 14% | |
| 9 | MCKEE Brynnley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 47% |
| 10 | FEIG Sela | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 62% | 23% |
| 11 | KANDADAI Lara | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 12 | YOUNG Audrey | 100% | 100% | 98% | 88% | 61% | 26% | 5% |
| 13 | YOUNG Charlotte G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 15% |
| 14 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 7% | |
| 15 | MCKEE Ainsley | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 61% | 19% | |
| 16 | BIRNSTILL Reese | 100% | 95% | 56% | 15% | 1% | - | |
| 17 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 35% | 6% |
| 18 | GUGALA Hanna | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 45% | 13% | 1% |
| 19 | ZENG Sarah | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 52% | 14% | |
| 20 | BUSH Bethany | 100% | 99% | 91% | 60% | 22% | 3% | |
| 21 | MANKOVA Varvara | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 45% | 15% | 2% |
| 22 | MARGULIAN Maria | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
| 23 | FLATT Sophia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 54% | 20% | 3% |
| 24 | ZHENG Valentina | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 41% | 8% |
| 25 | NAYAK Esha | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 31% | 4% |
| 26 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 39% | 9% | |
| 27 | CHAVAN Arya | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 56% | 17% | 2% |
| 28 | BAWA Anahat | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 22% | 4% |
| 29 | MURRAY Audrey A. | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 12% | 2% | |
| 29 | MYAT Chloe | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 9% | |
| 31 | DAI Olivia | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% | 37% | 3% | |
| 32 | MAGITSKY Leila | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | - |
| 33 | NAYAK Anika | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 41% | 13% | 2% |
| 34 | CHIANG Melissa | 100% | 100% | 96% | 71% | 26% | 1% | |
| 35 | MALEK Zolie | 100% | 98% | 86% | 58% | 24% | 4% | |
| 36 | LI Alexis | 100% | 98% | 76% | 31% | 5% | - | |
| 37 | LAGOON Miriam | 100% | 94% | 70% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 38 | FREEMAN Armine | 100% | 100% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
| 39 | BORGUETA Madison | 100% | 100% | 96% | 74% | 34% | 7% | - |
| 40 | WOTZAK Kaia | 100% | 98% | 80% | 39% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 41 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 100% | 96% | 76% | 42% | 14% | 2% | |
| 42 | LAURI Keira | 100% | 86% | 50% | 16% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | AKULA Roszlynn | 100% | 75% | 25% | 4% | - | - | |
| 44 | BIBLER Anna | 100% | 98% | 77% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 45 | SRINATH Lyra A. | 100% | 99% | 86% | 53% | 19% | 3% | - |
| 46 | STRIZHEVSKY Ariel | 100% | 78% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | |
| 47 | KHOST Maeve | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 48 | CHANG Elle | 100% | 96% | 74% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 49 | PALMIERI Giuliana M. | 100% | 97% | 72% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 50 | SVENSSON Siri Lin | 100% | 81% | 34% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 51 | PROZUMENT Elizabeth | 100% | 84% | 48% | 16% | 3% | - | - |
| 52 | HARRISON Allie | 100% | 36% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 53 | MERCHANT Aishwarya | 100% | 96% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% | |
| 54 | BEN SHAHAR-PYKE Lola Rae | 100% | 26% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 54 | SULLIVAN Siobhan | 100% | 59% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
| 56 | OPITZ Allyson | 100% | 55% | 12% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 57 | CHAMPAGNE Valentine | 100% | 34% | 5% | - | - | - | - |
| 58 | KONNIKOV Esther E. | 100% | 93% | 52% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
| 58 | HORVITZ Jacqueline | 100% | 82% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.