Floyd Little Athletic Center - New Haven, CT, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | PAUL Lila | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% | |
| 2 | MCKEE Brynnley | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 22% | |
| 3 | CHIANG Emily | - | - | 5% | 23% | 43% | 28% | |
| 3 | MUND Ruth | - | 2% | 14% | 36% | 36% | 12% | |
| 5 | YUAN Greta | - | - | 2% | 12% | 39% | 48% | |
| 6 | FESTA Carina | - | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 40% | 12% |
| 7 | JEONG Katie | - | 2% | 12% | 34% | 38% | 14% | |
| 8 | CHIANG Melissa | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - | |
| 9 | YANG Ashley M. | - | - | 2% | 14% | 44% | 40% | |
| 10 | BEVACQUA Aria F. | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 45% |
| 11 | NATH Trisha | - | - | 3% | 18% | 43% | 36% | |
| 12 | LU Elaine | - | - | - | 6% | 26% | 45% | 23% |
| 13 | JOHNSON Dagny L. | - | - | 6% | 27% | 46% | 20% | |
| 14 | GOMERMAN Sophia | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 15 | MONTORIO Lily M. | 1% | 10% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 5% | - |
| 16 | LIU Yifei | - | 4% | 20% | 39% | 29% | 7% | |
| 17 | WEBER Juliana I. | - | - | - | 3% | 20% | 45% | 31% |
| 18 | HILD Nisha | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 43% | 36% |
| 19 | LOO Kaitlyn | 2% | 24% | 41% | 26% | 7% | 1% | |
| 20 | ZHENG Valentina | - | 11% | 33% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 21 | LUKASHENKO Angelina | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 40% | 16% |
| 22 | ZHANG Sophie | 1% | 10% | 31% | 38% | 18% | 3% | |
| 23 | HAMBAZAZA Liisa | - | 8% | 29% | 38% | 20% | 4% | |
| 24 | NAYAK Esha | 1% | 13% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 25 | KHAN Alissa | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 30% | 10% | 1% |
| 26 | ZHANG Ruijia Alexa | 1% | 11% | 29% | 35% | 20% | 5% | - |
| 27 | MAKLIN Sofia | - | 3% | 16% | 37% | 34% | 10% | |
| 28 | NAYAK Indra | 1% | 10% | 32% | 38% | 17% | 3% | |
| 29 | CHOU Amy R. | 11% | 31% | 34% | 18% | 5% | - | - |
| 30 | MYAT Chloe | - | 8% | 31% | 39% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 31 | CHARLES Caitlin | 28% | 45% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
| 32 | SLOBODSKY Sasha L. | < 1% | 4% | 20% | 38% | 30% | 7% | |
| 33 | YOUNG Audrey | 2% | 14% | 34% | 34% | 14% | 2% | |
| 34 | SO Catelyn | - | 3% | 16% | 36% | 35% | 9% | |
| 35 | YAN Lena | 1% | 30% | 44% | 21% | 3% | - | |
| 36 | SHINCHUK Ellisha | 3% | 18% | 36% | 31% | 11% | 1% | |
| 37 | LAGOON Miriam | 4% | 21% | 38% | 29% | 9% | 1% | |
| 38 | BAWA Anahat | - | 17% | 42% | 32% | 8% | 1% | |
| 39 | DAI Olivia | 6% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 6% | - | |
| 40 | CHAVAN Arya | 7% | 29% | 38% | 21% | 5% | - | |
| 41 | NEUMAN Ella | 10% | 40% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 42 | LI Alexis | 24% | 45% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - | |
| 43 | BIRNSTILL Reese | 33% | 42% | 20% | 4% | - | - | |
| 44 | MCKEE Ainsley | 2% | 12% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 4% | - |
| 45 | MALEK Zolie | 3% | 17% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 46 | MARGULIAN Maria | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 47 | JOHNSTON Lily | - | 9% | 34% | 40% | 15% | 2% | |
| 48 | FLATT Sophia | 1% | 15% | 37% | 34% | 13% | 2% | |
| 49 | WOTZAK Kaia | 31% | 42% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - | - |
| 50 | LOPEZ-ONA Mia | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 6% | 1% | - |
| 51 | OPITZ Allyson | 72% | 27% | 2% | - | - | - | - |
| 52 | ATTIA Jasmine | 2% | 13% | 31% | 34% | 17% | 3% | - |
| 53 | AKULA Roszlynn | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
| 54 | NAYAK Anika | 18% | 39% | 31% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 55 | HARRISON Allie | 96% | 4% | - | - | - | - | |
| 56 | SULLIVAN Siobhan | 77% | 21% | 2% | - | - | - | |
| 57 | TAYLOR Lindsay | 4% | 23% | 41% | 26% | 6% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.