Sunnyvale, CA - Sunnyvale, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | BULAVKO Sonia | - | - | - | 2% | 14% | 42% | 42% |
| 2 | YEU Irene | - | - | - | - | 6% | 32% | 62% |
| 3 | MONTOYA Kimberlee C. | - | - | - | - | 4% | 27% | 68% |
| 3 | MACHULSKY Leehi | - | - | 1% | 8% | 38% | 53% | |
| 5 | ZUHARS Renee A. | - | - | 2% | 17% | 46% | 35% | |
| 6 | WANG Nora | - | - | 5% | 21% | 40% | 28% | 6% |
| 7 | CHEN Lefu | - | - | 1% | 12% | 41% | 45% | |
| 8 | LEUNG Natalie | - | - | 4% | 19% | 42% | 35% | |
| 9 | CHU Audrey | - | 1% | 19% | 44% | 31% | 5% | |
| 10 | TAYLOR Audrey Y. | - | 1% | 8% | 27% | 41% | 23% | |
| 11 | PRIMES Amanda M. | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
| 12 | ROTHMAN-HALL Bronwyn R. | - | 1% | 9% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 2% |
| 13 | LAN Alice S. | - | 1% | 7% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 3% |
| 14 | NGUYEN Kaylin A. | - | 1% | 13% | 39% | 38% | 10% | |
| 15 | GERARDIN Marie | 2% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 3% | |
| 16 | QURESHI Aafreen | 1% | 10% | 28% | 36% | 20% | 4% | |
| 17 | CHAN Cheri K. | - | 1% | 10% | 32% | 41% | 17% | |
| 18 | VACCA Erica | 15% | 38% | 33% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 19 | MOHABIR Ariane | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 9% | |
| 20 | BEI Karen | - | - | 2% | 14% | 37% | 37% | 10% |
| 21 | MONTOYA Amy C. | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 33% | 12% | 1% |
| 22 | WILEY Erica | - | 1% | 8% | 30% | 46% | 15% | |
| 23 | SOIN Anika A. | 1% | 8% | 29% | 39% | 20% | 3% | |
| 24 | SIVAGAR Fiona | 7% | 27% | 36% | 22% | 6% | 1% | |
| 25 | LEANG Andrea K. | - | 3% | 15% | 35% | 35% | 12% | |
| 26 | CHIRASHNYA Noya | 1% | 15% | 36% | 34% | 13% | 1% | |
| 27 | LIU Jennifer L. | - | 2% | 14% | 35% | 36% | 13% | |
| 28 | GALLON Maya S. | 2% | 15% | 37% | 35% | 10% | 1% | |
| 29 | LI Charlotte | 2% | 17% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
| 30 | RATH Lauren N. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 36% | 25% | 6% | |
| 31 | LEANG Priscilla Y. | 1% | 8% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 5% | |
| 32 | LAVERY Chloe K. | - | 5% | 35% | 41% | 17% | 2% | |
| 33 | DING Sandra | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
| 34 | PARKER Jacquie D. | 2% | 23% | 40% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
| 35 | SINHA Zara | 13% | 38% | 36% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 36 | DU Angela | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 37 | JIANG Corina | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 38 | DHILLON Amani | 2% | 15% | 34% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - |
| 39 | ESTRADA Anna G. | 12% | 38% | 35% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
| 39 | BONDAR Nika | 9% | 33% | 38% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 41 | LEE Kaitlyn M. | 4% | 22% | 38% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 42 | WILLIAMS Sarah | 2% | 12% | 33% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
| 43 | HSU Adele Y. | 30% | 44% | 21% | 4% | - | - | |
| 43 | ZHANG Chuyi | 14% | 35% | 33% | 15% | 3% | - | |
| 45 | HAU Olivia | 6% | 26% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | |
| 46 | LUO Xiao Ran | 5% | 21% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% | |
| 47 | RICH Caroline B. | 8% | 30% | 39% | 20% | 3% | - | |
| 48 | FELAND Alexandra | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | |
| 49 | PACHECO Naomi | 16% | 39% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 50 | DHILLON Ria | 11% | 66% | 21% | 2% | - | - | |
| 51 | HUANG audrey | - | 6% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% | - |
| 52 | YIN Grace | 17% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
| 53 | HOFMAN Haejung | 20% | 42% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
| 54 | ZHOU Ashlee | 57% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 55 | MUNEYB Muntaha Sana | 56% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 56 | LOUIE Sarah | 30% | 43% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
| 57 | DALEY Keira | 82% | 17% | - | - | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.