Richmond Fencing Club - Richmond, VA, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | STEPHENS Corbin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 67% | 25% |
2 | WORRALL Cary | 100% | 98% | 82% | 44% | 11% | 1% | |
3 | BANNEN Nicholas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 28% | 5% |
3 | ZALEWSKI David | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 35% | 8% |
5 | ZOOK Evan D. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 20% | |
7 | SO David | 100% | 97% | 78% | 40% | 10% | 1% | |
8 | FOREST Sung | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
9 | SHANKS Aidan T. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 82% | 49% | 14% |
10 | PAN Colin | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 46% | 7% | |
11 | ROTHKA Spencer J. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 84% | 48% | 11% | |
12 | JONES Colin | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 28% | 6% | - |
13 | SAUNIER Cameron | 100% | 98% | 83% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
14 | MCDOWELL Finn | 100% | 97% | 51% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
15 | JHA Ritika | 100% | 89% | 55% | 19% | 3% | - | |
16 | DICKENS Thomas | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 17% |
17 | FORMY DUVAL Christopher | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 17% | |
18 | ANDERSON Sr. Danny R. | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% | |
19 | DAVIS Robert C. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 35% | 7% |
20 | BARTLETT Lauren | 100% | 58% | 15% | 2% | - | - | - |
21 | WALLACE George | 100% | 82% | 42% | 11% | 2% | - | |
22 | BADLANI Neel | 100% | 92% | 63% | 26% | 5% | - | |
23 | DYE Jerold E. | 100% | 97% | 76% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - |
24 | REN Yunyan (Tina) | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
25 | PRESBY Alison | 100% | 66% | 23% | 4% | - | - | |
26 | NANAYAKKARA Sanuthi | 100% | 91% | 59% | 23% | 5% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.