Renaissance Fencing Club - Troy, MI, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| 1 | CHO Michael | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 28% | 40% | 21% |
| 2 | SENIC Adeline | - | - | - | 1% | 9% | 31% | 42% | 17% |
| 3 | EDWARDS Maxon | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 3 | DEGROOT Blake | - | - | - | 3% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 17% |
| 5 | TSAO Lukas | - | 1% | 5% | 16% | 30% | 31% | 16% | 3% |
| 6 | SOUKAR Michael E. | - | 1% | 5% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 11% | |
| 7 | PROCOPIO Lucia | - | 1% | 7% | 19% | 30% | 27% | 13% | 3% |
| 8 | LIU Ethan | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 32% | 10% | |
| 9 | GOGOI Vir K. | - | - | 5% | 22% | 39% | 28% | 6% | |
| 10 | MCISAAC Finn | - | 4% | 16% | 33% | 31% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 11 | STRINGER David | - | - | 4% | 28% | 41% | 23% | 4% | |
| 12 | MASSIMINO Andrew | 8% | 28% | 35% | 21% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
| 13 | KIM Daniel | 3% | 15% | 30% | 30% | 17% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 14 | BASSIK Eva | - | - | 3% | 16% | 34% | 34% | 12% | - |
| 15 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 1% | 10% | 29% | 34% | 19% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 16 | SON Wooyeong | 1% | 8% | 24% | 33% | 24% | 9% | 2% | - |
| 17 | HAN Katherine | 11% | 55% | 29% | 4% | - | - | - | |
| 18 | GANDLURI Sreehitha | - | 4% | 19% | 36% | 29% | 10% | 1% | - |
| 19 | MAVANI Krishna | 36% | 43% | 18% | 3% | - | - | - | - |
| 20 | BASSIK Judith M. | 1% | 17% | 49% | 28% | 5% | - | - | |
| 21 | KUSHNIR Aden N. | - | 2% | 11% | 26% | 32% | 21% | 7% | 1% |
| 22 | ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan | 19% | 37% | 29% | 12% | 3% | - | - | - |
| 23 | SEO odelia | 33% | 41% | 20% | 5% | 1% | - | - | |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.