Renaissance Fencing Club - Troy, MI, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
1 | CHO Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 89% | 61% | 21% |
2 | SENIC Adeline | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 59% | 17% |
3 | EDWARDS Maxon | 100% | 99% | 89% | 62% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - |
3 | DEGROOT Blake | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 85% | 55% | 17% |
5 | TSAO Lukas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 79% | 49% | 19% | 3% |
6 | SOUKAR Michael E. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 76% | 42% | 11% | |
7 | PROCOPIO Lucia | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 73% | 43% | 15% | 3% |
8 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 43% | 10% | |
9 | GOGOI Vir K. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 73% | 34% | 6% | |
10 | MCISAAC Finn | 100% | 100% | 96% | 80% | 47% | 16% | 3% | - |
11 | STRINGER David | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 69% | 27% | 4% | |
12 | MASSIMINO Andrew | 100% | 92% | 64% | 29% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
13 | KIM Daniel | 100% | 97% | 82% | 52% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - |
14 | BASSIK Eva | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 81% | 46% | 12% | - |
15 | SHEVCHENKO Kostiantyn | 100% | 99% | 89% | 60% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
16 | SON Wooyeong | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 34% | 11% | 2% | - |
17 | HAN Katherine | 100% | 89% | 34% | 4% | - | - | - | |
18 | GANDLURI Sreehitha | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 12% | 1% | - |
19 | MAVANI Krishna | 100% | 64% | 21% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
20 | BASSIK Judith M. | 100% | 99% | 82% | 33% | 5% | - | - | |
21 | KUSHNIR Aden N. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 61% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
22 | ARAVINDAKSHA Ayaan | 100% | 81% | 43% | 15% | 3% | - | - | - |
23 | SEO odelia | 100% | 67% | 26% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.