Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | DODIN Daniel M. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
| 2 | MIDYANY Ryan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 41% |
| 3 | KROPP Wesley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 74% | 32% |
| 3 | MAZAHERI Fletcher | 100% | 99% | 93% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 1% |
| 5 | MA Nolan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 90% | 64% | 24% |
| 6 | HONG Ethen | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 31% | 5% |
| 7 | MOSTOVOY philip | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 48% | |
| 8 | LIU Andrew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 73% | |
| 9 | KIM Julian | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 78% | 44% | 11% |
| 10 | MADRIGAL SALVAT Guillermo | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 48% | 13% | |
| 11 | KATS Brandon | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 67% | 25% | |
| 12 | YAO Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 45% | 11% | |
| 13 | SONG Aidan | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 14 | NOOL Aaron | 100% | 97% | 79% | 40% | 8% | - | |
| 15 | CHEN Tianjun | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 21% | 4% | - |
| 16 | LIU Austin | 100% | 99% | 86% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 17 | MASKIN Mikhail | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 52% | 8% | |
| 18 | DANILOV Artur | 100% | 100% | 94% | 75% | 40% | 10% | |
| 19 | YAKHNIS Seth | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 82% | 50% | 15% |
| 20 | BHANDARE Veer | 100% | 98% | 80% | 43% | 12% | 1% | |
| 21 | CHO Joshua | 100% | 100% | 92% | 58% | 18% | 2% | |
| 22 | LUO Alexander | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 78% | 42% | 9% |
| 23 | BEYER Timothy | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 21% | 3% |
| 24 | WHITE Jackson | 100% | 93% | 66% | 30% | 8% | 1% | |
| 25 | FRIZZELL Kai | 100% | 99% | 93% | 72% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
| 25 | TOPRANI Valmik | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 15% | 2% |
| 27 | ZHOU Zhi Matthew | 100% | 99% | 88% | 56% | 21% | 3% | |
| 28 | ZHANG Chaoyi（Joey） | 100% | 100% | 98% | 78% | 35% | 5% | |
| 29 | ZHAO Brandon | 100% | 68% | 19% | 2% | - | - | |
| 30 | CHEN Daniel | 100% | 98% | 79% | 41% | 11% | 1% | |
| 31 | WU MiEr | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 21% | 3% | |
| 32 | YOON Jonathan | 100% | 83% | 44% | 11% | 1% | - | |
| 33 | WU Matthew | 100% | 99% | 91% | 67% | 33% | 9% | 1% |
| 34 | YAO Aiden | 100% | 99% | 91% | 68% | 33% | 8% | 1% |
| 35 | KANG Ihan | 100% | 99% | 94% | 75% | 42% | 12% | 1% |
| 36 | ZHAO Kyle Zekai | 100% | 97% | 78% | 43% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 37 | ARMSTRONG Payson | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 52% | 18% | 2% |
| 38 | KIM Siwoo | 100% | 98% | 86% | 57% | 24% | 5% | - |
| 39 | VINCENT-GRAVENHISE Malcolm | 100% | 97% | 81% | 49% | 18% | 3% | - |
| 40 | WU Jiachen | 100% | 98% | 86% | 56% | 22% | 4% | |
| 41 | ZHOU Luke | 100% | 92% | 61% | 22% | 3% | - | |
| 42 | MAZAHERI Theodore | 100% | 63% | 16% | 2% | - | - | |
| 43 | LAI Jayden | 100% | 94% | 71% | 37% | 11% | 2% | - |
| 44 | DANILENKO Daniel | 100% | 98% | 85% | 55% | 23% | 5% | - |
| 45 | CHIANG William | 100% | 90% | 60% | 26% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 46 | SHAPIRO Samuel | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 33% | 6% | |
| 47 | RICHARDSON Matthew | 100% | 86% | 52% | 19% | 4% | - | - |
| 48 | MAZAHERI John | 100% | 89% | 56% | 22% | 5% | 1% | - |
| 49 | CAVALLARO Sebastian | 100% | 85% | 49% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 50 | LIU Alrik SiWei | 100% | 94% | 72% | 37% | 12% | 2% | - |
| 51 | PARK lewis | 100% | 93% | 68% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
| 52 | NIU Alexandre | 100% | 100% | 95% | 76% | 43% | 14% | 2% |
| 53 | ZHANG Jayden | 100% | 96% | 79% | 46% | 16% | 3% | - |
| 54 | ROFINO Samuel | 100% | 95% | 71% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - |
| 55 | CHO Joshua | 100% | 74% | 33% | 8% | 1% | - | |
| 56 | DURKIN Kasper | 100% | 84% | 45% | 13% | 2% | - | |
| 57 | CAMPBELL Alexander | 100% | 75% | 35% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
| 58 | VASSEUR Evan | 100% | 43% | 8% | 1% | - | - | |
| 59 | CHA Aiden | 100% | 55% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.