The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC/Y8

Y-12 Men's Saber

Friday, November 25, 2022 at 3:30 PM

Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Probability density of pool victories

Reset

Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.

# Name Number of victories
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
1 HUANG Alex F. - - - - - 11% 89%
2 NG Jonathan - - - 2% 12% 38% 48%
3 URSU Marcel T. - - - 1% 8% 35% 56%
3 CARRINGTON IV William T. - - - - 5% 32% 63%
5 NARDINI Nathanael P. - - 1% 8% 25% 40% 26%
6 OH Aster - 1% 5% 21% 40% 30% 3%
7 PINTO Marcus - - 1% 8% 29% 43% 19%
8 SRIVATS Vedh - 1% 7% 22% 35% 27% 8%
9 CLARK Aram - - - - 5% 32% 63%
9 CHAMBERS Miles - - - 1% 6% 31% 62%
11 YE Ivan - 2% 10% 27% 36% 21% 4%
12 SUN Andrew - 4% 17% 31% 31% 14% 2%
13 NOVOSYOLOK Zachary - 1% 7% 25% 42% 25%
14 MEDVINSKY Daniel - - 1% 9% 28% 41% 22%
15 AO Christopher - 1% 6% 22% 36% 27% 8%
16 DOMINIQUE Remson - - 3% 14% 33% 36% 14%
17 LIU Marvin - 2% 12% 31% 35% 17% 2%
18 MARTINSON Torm - 5% 19% 36% 30% 9% -
19 MERMEGAS Alexander - 1% 6% 24% 40% 26% 4%
20 CAO Ray - - - 2% 11% 36% 51%
21 SASSI Ilyas 5% 21% 33% 27% 12% 2% -
21 KIM Daehwan(Benjamin) - 4% 18% 36% 31% 11% 1%
23 ANAND Rishab - - 3% 13% 31% 37% 17%
24 LOO Jason - 5% 22% 37% 28% 7%
25 ZHAO Royce - 2% 9% 26% 37% 23% 4%
26 KITSON Chase - 1% 8% 25% 36% 24% 6%
27 BIVIJI Ali - 2% 12% 29% 34% 19% 4%
28 MCDONALD Finn - - 1% 9% 33% 46% 11%
29 LIU Ryan 1% 8% 22% 33% 25% 10% 1%
30 ONG Dylan - - 4% 22% 44% 27% 3%
30 GERTSBERG Eli 2% 10% 26% 33% 22% 7% 1%
32 GUREVICH Benjamin - - 1% 7% 24% 40% 27%
33 YOOK Isaac - - 5% 19% 36% 30% 9%
34 DAI Zihou - - 4% 18% 35% 32% 11%
35 TUNIK Joshuah 2% 13% 30% 33% 18% 4% -
36 WEI Rian - 4% 17% 33% 31% 13% 2%
37 XU Yixiao - - - 1% 8% 35% 57%
38 SHINCHUK Jacob 2% 16% 36% 32% 11% 1% -
39 MIAO Heqi - 2% 10% 27% 35% 21% 5%
40 BAI Evan - 1% 7% 24% 39% 26% 4%
41 KUMAR Avinash 1% 6% 21% 34% 27% 10% 1%
42 BARENBOYM Michael - 3% 15% 32% 33% 15% 2%
43 LIU Victor - - 3% 13% 31% 36% 17%
44 TAYCHER Aaron 1% 11% 28% 34% 20% 5% -
45 PARK Zachary 2% 13% 33% 34% 15% 2%
46 CHANG Ethan - 3% 12% 28% 34% 19% 4%
47 WELSTEAD Nicholas - 1% 6% 22% 37% 27% 7%
48 HARDRICK Noah 1% 8% 27% 37% 22% 5% -
49 STEVENS Flynn - 1% 5% 18% 34% 31% 11%
50 LIN Brendan 4% 22% 37% 26% 9% 1% -
51 MAGITSKY Isaac 4% 22% 37% 27% 9% 1% -
52 BASRALIAN Joey 2% 12% 29% 33% 19% 5% 1%
52 LIN Jacob 5% 21% 33% 27% 11% 2% -
54 LAU Kyrus - 3% 16% 36% 34% 10% 1%
55 SAGE Nikolai - 2% 10% 27% 36% 21% 4%
56 GRABOWSKI Alexander 2% 15% 33% 33% 14% 2% -
57 VIDREVICH David 2% 13% 30% 33% 18% 5% -
58 SAYAR Luke 6% 22% 33% 26% 11% 2% -
59 WONG Max 3% 17% 33% 30% 14% 3% -
60 CHENG Sawyer 2% 13% 29% 32% 18% 5% 1%
61 BADMUS Joshua 4% 20% 35% 28% 11% 2% -
62 WONG Hawken - 1% 7% 24% 40% 27% 1%
63 AGARWAAL Yohan - 4% 17% 35% 32% 11% 1%
64 SUH Leo 3% 20% 37% 28% 10% 2% -
65 SO Morgan - 5% 22% 36% 27% 9% 1%
66 KHANNA Adamantis - - - 4% 20% 44% 32%
67 PAUL James - 5% 20% 35% 29% 10% 1%
68 FOUX Jonathan 1% 6% 22% 35% 27% 9% 1%
69 NG Oliver - - 3% 17% 39% 33% 6%
70 CHAVAN Aditya 1% 7% 23% 35% 26% 8% 1%
71 DOSTAL Maximilian 1% 8% 26% 35% 22% 7% 1%
72 LEMERY Marc 8% 33% 38% 18% 4% - -
73 SONG Aidan 3% 17% 36% 31% 12% 2% -
74 ZHANG Joseph 10% 37% 36% 14% 2% - -
75 SO Dylan 1% 10% 28% 35% 20% 5% -
76 WU Vincent 3% 16% 33% 31% 14% 3% -
77 LEE Gordon 4% 23% 41% 26% 6% 1% -
78 CHANG Timothy 1% 7% 24% 37% 25% 6%
79 MALEK Zak - 4% 18% 35% 31% 11% 1%
80 TRZEPLA Max 20% 44% 27% 8% 1% - -
81 KARAVAS Nicholas 1% 9% 31% 39% 17% 3% -
82 SONG Nicholas 17% 38% 31% 12% 2% - -
82 CRAWFORD William 29% 41% 23% 6% 1% - -
84 ARVIND Adhijay 5% 23% 37% 26% 8% 1% -
85 GRABOWSKI Stanley 21% 40% 28% 10% 2% - -
86 ZHENG Hadrian 15% 37% 32% 13% 3% - -
87 SLAVNOV Anton 1% 7% 24% 36% 25% 7% -
88 OREN Daniel 3% 16% 33% 31% 14% 3% -
88 YANG LOUIS 22% 41% 27% 8% 1% - -
90 SUN Stephen 20% 41% 29% 9% 1% -
91 IMANUEL Ethan 2% 15% 34% 33% 14% 2% -
92 HU Jayden 3% 18% 34% 30% 13% 3% -
93 MHLEY Gavin 2% 16% 34% 32% 13% 2% -
94 ZHENG Hubert 3% 19% 35% 29% 11% 2% -
95 D'AMELJ Edoardo 1% 6% 20% 32% 28% 12% 2%
96 BHANDARE Niev 21% 39% 29% 10% 2% - -
97 BIVIJI Adam 2% 15% 35% 32% 13% 3% -
98 IVRON Daniel 8% 27% 35% 22% 7% 1% -
99 WAXLER Alex 1% 11% 33% 36% 16% 2% -
100 JIN Louis 33% 41% 21% 5% 1% - -
101 SAUVE Quinn 26% 41% 25% 7% 1% - -
102 LVOFF Leo 22% 42% 27% 8% 1% - -
103 PARK Emerson 1% 8% 29% 36% 20% 5% -
104 AVERY Marcus 11% 31% 34% 18% 5% 1% -
105 HUANG Bret 53% 36% 9% 1% - - -
106 JIA Charles 11% 33% 34% 17% 4% - -
107 LEE Ivan 22% 42% 27% 8% 1% -
108 YURT Zihni 6% 23% 35% 26% 10% 2% -
109 PAI Ayan 3% 20% 38% 28% 9% 1% -
110 ZAVERI Rohan 41% 42% 15% 2% - - -
110 HE Jason 23% 41% 26% 8% 1% - -
112 LEE Damian 3% 20% 43% 27% 6% 1% -
112 FREILICH Harrison 2% 18% 41% 30% 8% 1% -
114 CHAN Ewan 33% 44% 19% 4% - - -
114 YOUNG Parker 39% 41% 16% 3% - - -
114 FIROOZI Alex 44% 41% 13% 2% - - -
117 STEED-BORDNER Owen 22% 40% 27% 9% 2% - -
117 BROOKS Drake 2% 12% 27% 32% 20% 6% 1%

Explanation

The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:

This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.