The future of US Fencing is at stake!

For transparency, fairness, and athlete support, VOTE NOW for:
(1) Maria Panyi, (2) Andrey Geva, (3) Igor Chirashnya, and (4) Sue Moheb.

Take Action

Cobra Challenge SYC/RCC/Y8

Y-12 Men's Saber

Friday, November 25, 2022 at 3:30 PM

Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA

Results

Reset

Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.

# Name Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * Pool Victories
Pool DE Exp. Act. Diff.
1 HUANG Alex F. V V V V V V V V V V V V 5.9 6 +0.1
2 NG Jonathan V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.3 6 +0.7
3 URSU Marcel T. V V V V V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
3 CARRINGTON IV William T. V V V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
5 NARDINI Nathanael P. V V V V V V V V V D 4.8 6 +1.2
6 OH Aster V V V V V V V V V D 4.0 6 +2.0
7 PINTO Marcus V V V V V V V V V D 4.7 6 +1.3
8 SRIVATS Vedh V V V V V D V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
9 CLARK Aram V V V V V V V V D 5.6 6 +0.4
9 CHAMBERS Miles V V V V V V V V D 5.5 6 +0.5
11 YE Ivan V V V V V V V V D 3.8 6 +2.2
12 SUN Andrew V V V V V V V V D 3.4 6 +2.6
13 NOVOSYOLOK Zachary V V V V V V V V D 3.8 5 +1.2
14 MEDVINSKY Daniel V V V V D V V V V D 4.7 5 +0.3
15 AO Christopher V V V V D V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
16 DOMINIQUE Remson D V V V V V V V V D 4.4 5 +0.6
17 LIU Marvin V V V V V V V V D 3.6 6 +2.4
18 MARTINSON Torm V V V D V V V V D 3.2 5 +1.8
19 MERMEGAS Alexander V V D V V V V V D 4.0 5 +1.0
20 CAO Ray V V V V D V V V D 5.4 5 -0.4
21 SASSI Ilyas V V V D V V V V D 2.3 5 +2.7
21 KIM Daehwan(Benjamin) V V V V V D V V D 3.3 5 +1.7
23 ANAND Rishab D V V V V V V V D 4.5 5 +0.5
24 LOO Jason V V V V D V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
25 ZHAO Royce V D V V V D V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
26 KITSON Chase V D V V V D V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
27 BIVIJI Ali V D D V V V V V D 3.6 4 +0.4
28 MCDONALD Finn V V V D V D V V D 4.6 4 -0.6
29 LIU Ryan V D D V V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
30 ONG Dylan D V V D V V V V D 4.0 4 -
30 GERTSBERG Eli V V V D V D V V D 2.9 4 +1.1
32 GUREVICH Benjamin V V D V D V V V D 4.8 4 -0.8
33 YOOK Isaac V V V D V V V D 4.2 5 +0.8
34 DAI Zihou D V V V V V V D 4.3 5 +0.7
35 TUNIK Joshuah V D V V V V V D 2.7 5 +2.3
36 WEI Rian D V V D V V V D 3.4 4 +0.6
37 XU Yixiao V D V V D V V D 5.5 4 -1.5
38 SHINCHUK Jacob V D V V V D V D 2.4 4 +1.6
39 MIAO Heqi D V V D V V V D 3.8 4 +0.2
40 BAI Evan D V V V D V V D 3.9 4 +0.1
41 KUMAR Avinash V V D D V V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
42 BARENBOYM Michael V V D V V D V D 3.5 4 +0.5
43 LIU Victor V V D V V D V D 4.5 4 -0.5
44 TAYCHER Aaron D D V V V V V D 2.8 4 +1.2
45 PARK Zachary D V D V V V D 2.5 3 +0.5
46 CHANG Ethan D D V V D V V D 3.7 3 -0.7
47 WELSTEAD Nicholas V V D D V D V D 4.0 3 -1.0
48 HARDRICK Noah D V V D D V V D 2.9 3 +0.1
49 STEVENS Flynn V D D V D V V D 4.2 3 -1.2
50 LIN Brendan V D D D V V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
51 MAGITSKY Isaac D V D D V V V D 2.2 3 +0.8
52 BASRALIAN Joey D D V D V V V D 2.7 3 +0.3
52 LIN Jacob D V V D D V V D 2.3 3 +0.7
54 LAU Kyrus V V D V D D V D 3.3 3 -0.3
55 SAGE Nikolai V D V V D D V D 3.7 3 -0.7
56 GRABOWSKI Alexander V D V D V D V D 2.5 3 +0.5
57 VIDREVICH David D V V V D D V D 2.7 3 +0.3
58 SAYAR Luke V V V D D D V D 2.2 3 +0.8
59 WONG Max D D D V D V V D 2.4 2 -0.4
60 CHENG Sawyer D D V V D D V D 2.7 2 -0.7
61 BADMUS Joshua D D V V D D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
62 WONG Hawken V D D V D D V D 3.9 2 -1.9
63 AGARWAAL Yohan D V D D V D V D 3.3 2 -1.3
64 SUH Leo D V D V D D V D 2.3 2 -0.3
65 SO Morgan D D V V V V D 3.1 4 +0.9
66 KHANNA Adamantis V D V D V V D 5.0 4 -1.0
67 PAUL James D V V D V V D 3.2 4 +0.8
68 FOUX Jonathan V V D V D D D 3.1 3 -0.1
69 NG Oliver D V D V D V D 4.2 3 -1.2
70 CHAVAN Aditya V D D D V V D 3.0 3 -
71 DOSTAL Maximilian D D V V D V D 2.9 3 +0.1
72 LEMERY Marc D D V D V V D 1.8 3 +1.2
73 SONG Aidan V D V D V D D 2.4 3 +0.6
74 ZHANG Joseph D D V V V D D 1.6 3 +1.4
75 SO Dylan D D V D V V D 2.8 3 +0.2
76 WU Vincent V D V D V D D 2.5 3 +0.5
77 LEE Gordon V D D V D V D 2.1 3 +0.9
78 CHANG Timothy V D D D V D 3.0 2 -1.0
79 MALEK Zak D V V D D D D 3.3 2 -1.3
80 TRZEPLA Max D V D D V D D 1.3 2 +0.7
81 KARAVAS Nicholas V V D D D D D 2.7 2 -0.7
82 SONG Nicholas D V D V D D D 1.4 2 +0.6
82 CRAWFORD William D V D D V D D 1.1 2 +0.9
84 ARVIND Adhijay D D V V D D D 2.1 2 -0.1
85 GRABOWSKI Stanley D D V D V D D 1.3 2 +0.7
86 ZHENG Hadrian V V D D D D D 1.5 2 +0.5
87 SLAVNOV Anton D D V D V D D 3.0 2 -1.0
88 OREN Daniel V D V D D D D 2.5 2 -0.5
88 YANG LOUIS D D D V D V D 1.3 2 +0.7
90 SUN Stephen D D V D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
91 IMANUEL Ethan D V D D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
92 HU Jayden D D D D D V D 2.4 1 -1.4
93 MHLEY Gavin V D D D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
94 ZHENG Hubert V D D D D D D 2.3 1 -1.3
95 D'AMELJ Edoardo D D D D V D D 3.2 1 -2.2
96 BHANDARE Niev D V D D D D D 1.3 1 -0.3
97 BIVIJI Adam D D V D D D D 2.5 1 -1.5
98 IVRON Daniel D D D D D V D 2.0 1 -1.0
99 WAXLER Alex D D D D D V D 2.6 1 -1.6
100 JIN Louis V D D D D D D 1.0 1 -
101 SAUVE Quinn D V D D D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
102 LVOFF Leo V D D D D D D 1.2 1 -0.2
103 PARK Emerson V D D D D D D 2.8 1 -1.8
104 AVERY Marcus D D D D V D D 1.8 1 -0.8
105 HUANG Bret D D D D D V D 0.6 1 +0.4
106 JIA Charles V D D D D D D 1.7 1 -0.7
107 LEE Ivan D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
108 YURT Zihni D D D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
109 PAI Ayan D D D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
110 ZAVERI Rohan D D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
110 HE Jason D D D D D D D 1.2 0 -1.2
112 LEE Damian D D D D D D D 2.2 0 -2.2
112 FREILICH Harrison D D D D D D D 2.3 0 -2.3
114 CHAN Ewan D D D D D D D 0.9 0 -0.9
114 YOUNG Parker D D D D D D D 0.8 0 -0.8
114 FIROOZI Alex D D D D D D D 0.7 0 -0.7
117 STEED-BORDNER Owen D D D D D D D 1.3 0 -1.3
117 BROOKS Drake D D D D D D D 2.8 0 -2.8

Legend

Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).

Color Outcome Opponent's Difficulty Probability of Victory
Victory Very Hard 0% to 20%
Victory Hard 20% to 40%
Victory Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Victory Easy 60% to 80%
Victory Very Easy 80% to 100%
Defeat Very Hard 0% to 20%
Defeat Hard 20% to 40%
Defeat Roughly Even 40% to 60%
Defeat Easy 60% to 80%
Defeat Very Easy 80% to 100%

Explanation

The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:

This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.