Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the probability of achieving at least a certain number of victories in the pool for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CO Dylan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 79% | 38% |
2 | LIN Michael | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 83% |
3 | LI Matthew | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 65% |
3 | LEE Jonah | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 49% |
5 | LIN James G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 57% |
6 | LING Eddie | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 26% |
7 | XU Jia Bao (Bowen) | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 80% |
8 | MAO Lucas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 63% | 18% | |
9 | TRAUGOT Owen G. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 81% |
10 | QIAN Jason H. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 61% |
11 | LEE Brendan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 33% |
12 | YU Jason | 100% | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 30% | |
13 | XU Xinhao ( Sonny) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 34% | 7% |
14 | TANG August L. | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 50% | 15% |
15 | AKYAMAC Bora | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 24% | 3% |
16 | CHEN Ethan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 76% | 41% | 12% | 2% |
17 | HUANG Eythan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 66% | 22% |
18 | TANG Albert | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 87% | 39% | |
19 | GUO Justin | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 25% |
20 | SONG Noel | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 92% | 61% | 18% |
21 | PARRISH Evan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
22 | GHEDINI Luca | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 74% | 38% | 8% |
23 | SHENG Dalton | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 13% | |
23 | RUIZ ALMEIDA Muhammad | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 44% | 10% | |
25 | LIU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 35% | |
25 | YAO Bradley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 35% | |
27 | TANG Alexander L. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 95% | 76% | 40% | 9% |
28 | TAN Aidan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 99% | 89% | 54% | 14% |
29 | CHENG Ethan | 100% | 100% | 99% | 90% | 63% | 26% | 5% |
30 | WANG Auther | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 42% | 13% | 2% |
31 | LEE Eugene | 100% | 99% | 91% | 65% | 30% | 7% | 1% |
32 | HE Kyle | 100% | 95% | 68% | 28% | 5% | - | |
33 | LI Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 80% | 36% | |
34 | CHEN Kyle P. | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 30% | 5% | |
35 | ZHAO Adam | 100% | 100% | 100% | 94% | 71% | 32% | 5% |
35 | TALASILA Arush | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 68% | 30% | 5% |
37 | SIMONOV Timofey | 100% | 100% | 99% | 94% | 72% | 36% | 8% |
38 | JURMAN Therin | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 36% | 9% | 1% |
39 | WONG Jacob W. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 62% | 23% | 4% | - |
39 | ZHANG Matthew | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 17% | 2% |
41 | SRINIVASAN Vedant | 100% | 100% | 94% | 73% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
42 | XIE Buster | 100% | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 26% | 2% |
43 | DESERANNO Leander | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 27% | 3% |
44 | LIU Derek | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 37% | |
45 | WANG Brian | 100% | 100% | 93% | 60% | 20% | 2% | |
46 | XU Ethan | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 11% |
47 | ZHANG Aaron | 100% | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 57% | 19% |
48 | LI Bradley | 100% | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 47% | 9% |
49 | TONKOVICH Ryan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 86% | 55% | 18% | 1% |
50 | ALLEN Henry G. | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 58% | 23% | 4% |
50 | LIU Zixian (Aaron) | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 69% | 29% | 3% |
52 | ZHANG Lucas | 100% | 95% | 66% | 26% | 5% | - | |
53 | WANG Rory | 100% | 89% | 57% | 21% | 4% | - | |
54 | ARCE Andrew W. | 100% | 99% | 92% | 65% | 28% | 5% | - |
55 | ARIZA Abraham J. | 100% | 100% | 95% | 75% | 40% | 12% | 1% |
56 | YU William | 100% | 99% | 89% | 58% | 22% | 4% | - |
57 | LIU Eric | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 46% | 13% | 1% |
57 | CHUANG Oscar | 100% | 100% | 99% | 86% | 42% | 10% | 1% |
59 | CHENG Logan | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 32% | 8% | 1% |
60 | KAPOOR Aayan | 100% | 100% | 96% | 70% | 28% | 4% | |
61 | SHAO Eric | 100% | 100% | 96% | 78% | 39% | 8% | |
62 | CHO Xzander | 100% | 100% | 98% | 77% | 24% | 2% | |
63 | ZHUANG Chuanxuan | 100% | 99% | 82% | 45% | 15% | 2% | - |
64 | YANG Charles | 100% | 100% | 95% | 77% | 43% | 13% | 2% |
65 | LU Nathan | 100% | 90% | 55% | 17% | 2% | - | |
66 | FENG Michael | 100% | 89% | 55% | 20% | 4% | - | - |
67 | SUN Ryan | 100% | 100% | 97% | 79% | 43% | 12% | 1% |
68 | GRIFFITH MCALLISTER thomas | 100% | 100% | 99% | 93% | 68% | 27% | 2% |
69 | YANG Dylan | 100% | 99% | 84% | 29% | 3% | - | |
70 | SURESH Rohan | 100% | 80% | 38% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
71 | ZENG Rick | 100% | 100% | 96% | 77% | 41% | 11% | - |
71 | CHENG Austyn | 100% | 87% | 52% | 18% | 3% | - | - |
73 | ONG Nicholas | 100% | 99% | 66% | 26% | 5% | 1% | - |
74 | LU Alex | 100% | 98% | 85% | 56% | 23% | 5% | - |
75 | PALMA Nathan Anthony | 100% | 100% | 98% | 85% | 52% | 16% | 1% |
76 | BRAIZINHA Thomas | 100% | 100% | 95% | 74% | 39% | 11% | 1% |
77 | SENANI arjun | 100% | 99% | 91% | 62% | 25% | 4% | - |
78 | JIMENEZ Naveen | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 28% | 4% | |
79 | TANG Terry | 100% | 100% | 99% | 91% | 66% | 30% | 6% |
80 | XIE Jicheng | 100% | 98% | 80% | 42% | 12% | 1% | - |
81 | DOELL Ethan | 100% | 100% | 98% | 87% | 55% | 19% | 2% |
82 | TOOMRE Kai | 100% | 100% | 97% | 81% | 47% | 13% | 1% |
83 | VADEN Oliver | 100% | 99% | 90% | 64% | 29% | 7% | 1% |
84 | GULCHIN Mark (Yerma) | 100% | 100% | 97% | 83% | 53% | 20% | 3% |
85 | HUA Aaron | 100% | 99% | 92% | 66% | 29% | 6% | - |
86 | HOU Gaven | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 24% | 4% | - |
87 | FOGELSON Hugh | 100% | 96% | 70% | 29% | 6% | 1% | - |
88 | YUE Jackson | 100% | 94% | 69% | 32% | 8% | 1% | - |
89 | MO Ethan | 100% | 100% | 94% | 70% | 32% | 7% | 1% |
90 | XU Nathan | 100% | 76% | 34% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
91 | PECK Quinn | 100% | 99% | 90% | 60% | 23% | 4% | - |
92 | SONG Yuxuan Austin | 100% | 76% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
93 | LATORRE Leonardo | 100% | 92% | 63% | 25% | 5% | - | - |
94 | ZHANG Alex | 100% | 80% | 40% | 11% | 1% | - | |
95 | MARTIN Darius | 100% | 99% | 93% | 70% | 32% | 6% | |
96 | LI Lianhan | 100% | 93% | 65% | 27% | 6% | - | |
97 | LIANG Haojia | 100% | 66% | 13% | 1% | - | - | |
98 | GE Daniel | 100% | 81% | 40% | 9% | 1% | - | |
99 | WANG ZEYU | 100% | 54% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
100 | HWANG Harris | 100% | 83% | 45% | 14% | 2% | - | - |
101 | KO Caleb | 100% | 89% | 57% | 23% | 5% | 1% | - |
102 | HOLLIS Sean | 100% | 82% | 40% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
103 | MOTOOKA Eito | 100% | 98% | 77% | 39% | 11% | 2% | - |
104 | CHEN kenneth | 100% | 81% | 36% | 8% | 1% | - | - |
105 | WANG Luke | 100% | 80% | 39% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
106 | BAI Brian | 100% | 78% | 37% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
107 | TAM Kyle | 100% | 85% | 40% | 6% | - | - | - |
108 | TSAY Jordan R. | 100% | 100% | 99% | 88% | 57% | 18% | 1% |
109 | WU Isaac | 100% | 62% | 18% | 2% | - | - | - |
110 | TENG Darian | 100% | 88% | 47% | 9% | 1% | - | - |
111 | JIN Andy | 100% | 93% | 66% | 28% | 6% | 1% | - |
112 | ONIK Ari N. | 100% | 81% | 43% | 13% | 2% | - | - |
112 | KRZYWON Dylan | 100% | 61% | 16% | 1% | - | - | - |
114 | POLEBOYINA Amrit | 100% | 75% | 28% | 5% | - | - | - |
115 | SUNDSTROM Wren | 100% | 69% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
116 | MARTIRE Luca | 100% | 86% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | - |
117 | ZHONG Maxwell | 100% | 61% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
118 | VO Aidan | 100% | 79% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | |
118 | BO Aiden | 100% | 51% | 6% | - | - | - | |
120 | TANG Royce | 100% | 98% | 84% | 51% | 17% | 2% | - |
121 | HAN Alexander | 100% | 82% | 41% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
122 | ZHAO Ryan | 100% | 48% | 10% | 1% | - | - | |
123 | ZHANG Albert | 100% | 74% | 31% | 7% | 1% | - | - |
124 | TSENG Lucas | 100% | 37% | 6% | - | - | - | - |
124 | CHOI Jackson | 100% | 30% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
124 | MENDEZ Ren | 100% | 71% | 26% | 5% | - | - | - |
127 | POWELL Sean | 100% | 72% | 20% | 2% | - | - | |
128 | LIN Dexter | 100% | 7% | - | - | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.