Meadowlands Expo Center - Secaucus, NJ, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
# | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
1 | CHO Emily (Euran) | - | - | - | 3% | 17% | 42% | 37% |
2 | YANG Emma | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 50% | ||
3 | HO Addison | - | - | - | - | 5% | 33% | 62% |
3 | KUMAMOTO Shino | - | - | - | 2% | 20% | 79% | |
5 | CHEN Renee | - | - | - | 1% | 6% | 31% | 63% |
6 | PEVZNER Nicole | - | - | 4% | 20% | 44% | 30% | 3% |
7 | SHEN Emilia | - | - | 1% | 8% | 28% | 42% | 21% |
8 | LI Han (Helina) | - | 2% | 13% | 37% | 38% | 10% | |
9 | DENG Melissa | - | - | 1% | 10% | 38% | 51% | |
9 | JOO Natalie | - | - | - | 2% | 15% | 44% | 40% |
11 | REN Kayley | - | - | - | 5% | 27% | 48% | 19% |
12 | XIE Lillian | - | - | 1% | 8% | 29% | 44% | 18% |
13 | WANG CAROL | 1% | 9% | 32% | 43% | 15% | ||
14 | ZHOU Chenchu | - | - | - | 1% | 7% | 33% | 60% |
15 | SHENG Katherine | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 37% | 18% | 3% |
16 | FIELD Elizabeth | - | - | 3% | 18% | 42% | 32% | 4% |
17 | WANG Joanna | - | - | 2% | 11% | 34% | 42% | 11% |
18 | TANG Melody Fujiao | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 33% | 6% | |
19 | HARRIS Julia | - | 1% | 11% | 31% | 38% | 17% | 2% |
20 | HU Jenna | - | - | 2% | 11% | 31% | 39% | 17% |
21 | WANG Sunny | - | 4% | 18% | 35% | 31% | 11% | 1% |
22 | FENG Grace | - | - | 1% | 7% | 34% | 58% | |
23 | MCSHERRY Kayla | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | ||
24 | BING Charlotte | - | 1% | 6% | 23% | 40% | 26% | 5% |
25 | WANG Amabel | - | - | 1% | 6% | 27% | 46% | 20% |
26 | TSIMIKLIS aphrodite | - | - | 3% | 18% | 39% | 32% | 7% |
27 | HAO Danica | - | 1% | 10% | 29% | 37% | 19% | 3% |
27 | ZHANG Soleil C. | - | - | - | 3% | 16% | 44% | 37% |
29 | KAPRAN Anastasia | - | - | 4% | 18% | 36% | 33% | 9% |
30 | EYER Brooke | 9% | 34% | 39% | 16% | 2% | ||
31 | LI Savannah | 19% | 40% | 29% | 10% | 2% | - | - |
32 | ORRINGER Lottie | 1% | 11% | 32% | 37% | 16% | 3% | - |
33 | LIN Yunong | - | 5% | 23% | 42% | 26% | 2% | |
34 | ZHANG Ivy | 3% | 18% | 40% | 32% | 7% | ||
35 | FENG Audrey | 6% | 29% | 42% | 20% | 3% | ||
36 | ZELDIN Nadia | 1% | 12% | 32% | 35% | 16% | 3% | - |
37 | DIMATULAC Elise Ann | - | 3% | 22% | 42% | 26% | 6% | - |
38 | SOE Hayleigh | 3% | 18% | 34% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - |
39 | ZHANG Gwenyth | - | 1% | 11% | 33% | 38% | 15% | 2% |
40 | BROWN Lola | - | 2% | 13% | 42% | 43% | ||
41 | CASCONE Sophie | - | 11% | 34% | 36% | 15% | 2% | - |
42 | ZHANG Constance | 1% | 9% | 35% | 38% | 15% | 2% | - |
43 | RAFFAELE Nancy | 6% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
44 | XU Sunia (Tai Yang) | - | 4% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 12% | 2% |
45 | TAN Dorathy | - | 2% | 12% | 31% | 36% | 17% | 2% |
46 | DESERANNO Seren | 1% | 7% | 24% | 36% | 24% | 7% | 1% |
47 | LEE Jeemin | 6% | 28% | 40% | 21% | 4% | - | |
48 | CAI Ilana | 2% | 14% | 35% | 35% | 13% | 1% | |
49 | ZHANG Zoey | 9% | 33% | 39% | 17% | 2% | - | |
50 | KIM Claire | 4% | 23% | 38% | 27% | 7% | 1% | |
51 | HUANG Natalie | - | 6% | 24% | 42% | 25% | 2% | |
52 | FEDER Acadia | 3% | 20% | 40% | 29% | 8% | 1% | |
53 | LIN isabella | 1% | 9% | 32% | 39% | 17% | 2% | |
54 | KIM Sydney | 1% | 11% | 32% | 36% | 17% | 3% | - |
55 | LIU Caydence | 1% | 16% | 38% | 32% | 11% | 1% | - |
56 | ZHANG Lian | 1% | 9% | 27% | 36% | 21% | 5% | - |
57 | WAN Celine | 39% | 42% | 16% | 3% | - | - | - |
58 | KIM Claire | 2% | 16% | 35% | 31% | 13% | 2% | - |
59 | REZA Fukaina | 24% | 45% | 26% | 5% | - | ||
60 | YIN Chloe | 5% | 33% | 41% | 18% | 3% | - | |
61 | WANG DINA C. | 1% | 18% | 40% | 31% | 10% | 1% | - |
62 | KIM Sophia | 2% | 16% | 36% | 33% | 11% | 1% | - |
63 | PUTHOFF Olivia | 1% | 12% | 31% | 35% | 17% | 4% | - |
64 | MA Isabelle | 28% | 43% | 23% | 5% | - | ||
65 | JIN Sophie | 11% | 36% | 36% | 14% | 2% | - | |
66 | CAO Kayla | 5% | 24% | 39% | 25% | 6% | 1% | - |
67 | GE Deanna | 15% | 36% | 33% | 14% | 3% | - | - |
68 | ZEE Savannah | 17% | 38% | 31% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
69 | YU Yi | 57% | 35% | 7% | 1% | - | - | |
70 | MCFARLANE Asha | 2% | 21% | 38% | 28% | 9% | 1% | - |
71 | LI Beryl | 29% | 44% | 22% | 5% | - | - | - |
72 | CHIANG Mila | 1% | 6% | 21% | 36% | 28% | 8% | - |
73 | BAULIN Zoya | 12% | 43% | 34% | 10% | 1% | - | - |
74 | BO Iris | 51% | 38% | 9% | 1% | - | - | - |
75 | WANG Selina | 67% | 28% | 4% | - | - | - | - |
76 | SHEN Jayla | 33% | 49% | 16% | 2% | - | - | - |
77 | HUSSAIN Maya | 24% | 45% | 25% | 5% | - | ||
78 | QIN Adriana | 3% | 21% | 40% | 27% | 8% | 1% | - |
79 | SHANG Arianna | 41% | 42% | 15% | 2% | - | - | |
79 | KENNEDY Izadora | 29% | 44% | 23% | 5% | - | - | |
81 | LIANG Jasmine | 8% | 28% | 37% | 22% | 5% | - | - |
82 | HAFEZ Sahar | 14% | 38% | 34% | 12% | 2% | - | - |
83 | CHEN Catherine | 89% | 11% | - | - | - | - | - |
84 | STEED-BORDNER Maura | 38% | 48% | 13% | 1% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.