The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Color shade indicates the magnitude of a surprise (positive or negative). Grey means no suprise. Read more.
| # | Name | Bout Difficulty vs. Outcome * | Pool Victories | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pool | DE | Exp. | Act. | Diff. | ||
| 1 | WANG Jessie | D V V D V | V V V V V | 4.0 | 3 | -1.0 |
| 2 | LIN ariel | V V D V D V | V V V V D | 4.2 | 4 | -0.2 |
| 3 | CAMAMA Tessa | V D V V D V | V V V D | 4.3 | 4 | -0.3 |
| 3 | SALISTRA Emilia | V D V D V V | V V V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 5 | SHARMA Sanvi | V V V V V V | V V D | 5.3 | 6 | +0.7 |
| 6 | CHANG Celine A. | V V V V V D | V V D | 4.5 | 5 | +0.5 |
| 7 | CHUNG Penelope | V V V V D | V V D | 3.4 | 4 | +0.6 |
| 8 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | V D D D V V | V V D | 3.5 | 3 | -0.5 |
| 9 | MARTYNOVA Diana | V V V V V D | V D | 5.0 | 5 | - |
| 10 | LAI Amanda | V V V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 5 | +2.1 |
| 11 | BHATT Anisha | V V V D V | V D | 3.6 | 4 | +0.4 |
| 12 | SAID Riana | V V D V V | V D | 3.7 | 4 | +0.3 |
| 13 | MOLLINIER Angel | V V D V D V | V D | 3.3 | 4 | +0.7 |
| 14 | DAYAL Saahira | V V D V D V | V D | 3.9 | 4 | +0.1 |
| 15 | XU Celina | D V V V D | V D | 2.9 | 3 | +0.1 |
| 16 | HAU Olivia | D D V D D V | V V D | 4.0 | 2 | -2.0 |
| 17 | MULAGARI Swarasai | V V V D V V | D | 2.4 | 5 | +2.6 |
| 18 | SIMHADRI Meghana | V V D V D V | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 19 | DUONG Zoey | D D V V V V | D | 4.0 | 4 | - |
| 20 | JAMES Ashley | D V D V V V | D | 2.0 | 4 | +2.0 |
| 21 | CHANG Abigail | V D V V V D | D | 3.0 | 4 | +1.0 |
| 22 | TSE Harmony | D D V V V | D | 2.8 | 3 | +0.2 |
| 23 | BLANCO Ariia | D V D V V | D | 3.2 | 3 | -0.2 |
| 24 | ESTRADA Ariana | V D V V D | D | 2.4 | 3 | +0.6 |
| 25 | COHEN Shaina | D V D V D V | D | 1.7 | 3 | +1.3 |
| 26 | YIN Gabriela | D D D V V V | V D | 3.1 | 3 | -0.1 |
| 27 | MYERS Cal | V D D D V | V D | 1.4 | 2 | +0.6 |
| 28 | DALEY Keira | D V D V D D | V D | 3.5 | 2 | -1.5 |
| 29 | GILLIS-PADE Neallie | D D V D D V | V D | 2.6 | 2 | -0.6 |
| 30 | ENRILE Erica | D V V D D D | V D | 4.6 | 2 | -2.6 |
| 31 | SCHOR Elisabeth | V V D D D D | V D | 2.1 | 2 | -0.1 |
| 32 | POON Desiree | D D D D V V | V D | 3.1 | 2 | -1.1 |
| 33 | DAVIS Violet | V D D D D | D | 0.9 | 1 | +0.1 |
| 34 | LEE Valerie | D D D D V D | D | 1.8 | 1 | -0.8 |
| 35 | MU Kelsey | D D D D D | D | 0.7 | 0 | -0.7 |
| 36 | BANERJEE Eesha | D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 37 | CHEN Samantha | D D D D D D | D | 1.1 | 0 | -1.1 |
| 37 | MAGYARI-KOPE Ingrid | D D D D D D | D | 0.5 | 0 | -0.5 |
| 39 | NAZARENKO Sasha | D D D D D D | D | 0.2 | 0 | -0.2 |
| 40 | JAIN Aashi | D D D D D D | D | 0.9 | 0 | -0.9 |
Color coded boxes represent the outcome against opponents of varying difficulty levels from the perspective of the fencer. Letters inside the boxes indicate victory (V) and defeat (D).
| Color | Outcome | Opponent's Difficulty | Probability of Victory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Victory | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Victory | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Victory | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Victory | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Victory | Very Easy | 80% to 100% | |
| Defeat | Very Hard | 0% to 20% | |
| Defeat | Hard | 20% to 40% | |
| Defeat | Roughly Even | 40% to 60% | |
| Defeat | Easy | 60% to 80% | |
| Defeat | Very Easy | 80% to 100% |
The visual cues provided in this table highlight bouts that may be considered surprises based on the relative strengths of the competitors:
This visualization is designed to give both fencers and spectators an immediate sense of the unexpected outcomes of the competition. While every bout has its unique circumstances, these indicators can help highlight moments where a fencer overcame the odds or where there was an unexpected turn of events.