The Fencing Center - San Jose, CA, USA
Explore the pool victory probability density for each fencer, with their actual victories highlighted in a box. Learn more.
| # | Name | Number of victories | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ||
| 1 | WANG Jessie | - | - | 4% | 21% | 44% | 30% | |
| 2 | LIN ariel | - | - | 4% | 19% | 39% | 31% | 7% |
| 3 | CAMAMA Tessa | - | - | 4% | 17% | 36% | 33% | 10% |
| 3 | SALISTRA Emilia | - | 2% | 11% | 29% | 36% | 19% | 3% |
| 5 | SHARMA Sanvi | - | - | - | 2% | 12% | 40% | 46% |
| 6 | CHANG Celine A. | - | - | 3% | 14% | 32% | 35% | 15% |
| 7 | CHUNG Penelope | - | 3% | 15% | 36% | 35% | 12% | |
| 8 | CHIRASHNYA Mika | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 16% | 3% |
| 9 | MARTYNOVA Diana | - | - | 1% | 5% | 22% | 42% | 30% |
| 10 | LAI Amanda | 1% | 10% | 27% | 34% | 21% | 6% | 1% |
| 11 | BHATT Anisha | - | 2% | 11% | 32% | 38% | 17% | |
| 12 | SAID Riana | - | 1% | 9% | 30% | 42% | 18% | |
| 13 | MOLLINIER Angel | - | 4% | 18% | 33% | 29% | 12% | 2% |
| 14 | DAYAL Saahira | - | 1% | 6% | 25% | 40% | 24% | 4% |
| 15 | XU Celina | 1% | 7% | 27% | 40% | 21% | 4% | |
| 16 | HAU Olivia | - | 1% | 7% | 22% | 35% | 27% | 8% |
| 17 | MULAGARI Swarasai | 3% | 18% | 34% | 30% | 13% | 3% | - |
| 18 | SIMHADRI Meghana | 1% | 8% | 26% | 35% | 23% | 7% | 1% |
| 19 | DUONG Zoey | - | 1% | 7% | 23% | 36% | 26% | 7% |
| 20 | JAMES Ashley | 5% | 26% | 38% | 23% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 21 | CHANG Abigail | - | 5% | 25% | 39% | 24% | 6% | - |
| 22 | TSE Harmony | 1% | 9% | 30% | 37% | 19% | 3% | |
| 23 | BLANCO Ariia | - | 3% | 19% | 38% | 31% | 8% | |
| 24 | ESTRADA Ariana | 2% | 16% | 39% | 32% | 10% | 1% | |
| 25 | COHEN Shaina | 11% | 34% | 34% | 16% | 4% | - | - |
| 26 | YIN Gabriela | - | 6% | 22% | 34% | 26% | 9% | 1% |
| 27 | MYERS Cal | 13% | 44% | 33% | 9% | 1% | - | |
| 28 | DALEY Keira | - | 3% | 15% | 31% | 32% | 15% | 3% |
| 29 | GILLIS-PADE Neallie | 1% | 12% | 36% | 35% | 14% | 2% | - |
| 30 | ENRILE Erica | - | - | 2% | 12% | 30% | 38% | 19% |
| 31 | SCHOR Elisabeth | 5% | 25% | 37% | 24% | 7% | 1% | - |
| 32 | POON Desiree | - | 6% | 22% | 36% | 27% | 9% | 1% |
| 33 | DAVIS Violet | 34% | 42% | 19% | 4% | - | - | |
| 34 | LEE Valerie | 4% | 36% | 40% | 17% | 3% | - | - |
| 35 | MU Kelsey | 45% | 40% | 13% | 2% | - | - | |
| 36 | BANERJEE Eesha | 20% | 50% | 24% | 5% | - | - | |
| 37 | CHEN Samantha | 29% | 42% | 22% | 6% | 1% | - | - |
| 37 | MAGYARI-KOPE Ingrid | 56% | 34% | 8% | 1% | - | - | - |
| 39 | NAZARENKO Sasha | 80% | 18% | 1% | - | - | - | - |
| 40 | JAIN Aashi | 38% | 42% | 17% | 3% | - | - | - |
The heatmap in this table provides a visual representation of the victory probability distribution for each fencer in their respective pools:
This heatmap visualization offers an immediate understanding of each fencer's expected performance compared to their actual results.